{"title":"实时态势感知预测中时间动态与测量噪声的平衡。","authors":"Kieran J Smith, Torin K Clark, Tristan C Endsley","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2025.2558703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Situation awareness (SA)-an operator's perception, comprehension, and projection of goal-critical information-is fundamental to the safety and performance of human operators. Recent advances in autonomous systems can reduce operator SA, so researchers have sought real-time, nondisruptive indicators of SA to enable SA-based adaptive cooperation in human-autonomy teams. However, gold-standard freeze-probe measures of SA are not validated for use as ground truth in real-time predictive models. Working memory constraints force single-trial measures to be partial by nature. Existing workarounds smooth over temporal dynamics, precluding real-time predictive models. This work shows that a 3-trial moving average SA score reduces measurement noise while preserving temporal information. Moving average scores are more strongly correlated (<i>r</i> = 0.36, <i>p</i> < 0.01) with performance than single trial SA scores and can be predicted by single-trial physiological signals with greater accuracy (standardized mean absolute error = 0.61, <i>Q</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.36) than single trial SA scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing temporal dynamics with measurement noise in real-time situation awareness prediction.\",\"authors\":\"Kieran J Smith, Torin K Clark, Tristan C Endsley\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00140139.2025.2558703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Situation awareness (SA)-an operator's perception, comprehension, and projection of goal-critical information-is fundamental to the safety and performance of human operators. Recent advances in autonomous systems can reduce operator SA, so researchers have sought real-time, nondisruptive indicators of SA to enable SA-based adaptive cooperation in human-autonomy teams. However, gold-standard freeze-probe measures of SA are not validated for use as ground truth in real-time predictive models. Working memory constraints force single-trial measures to be partial by nature. Existing workarounds smooth over temporal dynamics, precluding real-time predictive models. This work shows that a 3-trial moving average SA score reduces measurement noise while preserving temporal information. Moving average scores are more strongly correlated (<i>r</i> = 0.36, <i>p</i> < 0.01) with performance than single trial SA scores and can be predicted by single-trial physiological signals with greater accuracy (standardized mean absolute error = 0.61, <i>Q</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.36) than single trial SA scores.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2558703\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2558703","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
态势感知(SA)——操作员对目标关键信息的感知、理解和投射——是人类操作员安全和性能的基础。自主系统的最新进展可以减少操作员的SA,因此研究人员一直在寻求实时、无干扰的SA指标,以实现基于SA的人类自主团队自适应合作。然而,SA的金标准冷冻探针测量并没有被验证为实时预测模型中的基础真理。工作记忆的限制迫使单次试验的测量本质上是局部的。现有的解决方案平滑了时间动态,排除了实时预测模型。这项工作表明,3次移动平均SA评分在保留时间信息的同时减少了测量噪声。移动平均得分比单次试验SA得分相关性更强(r = 0.36, p Q2 = 0.36)。
Balancing temporal dynamics with measurement noise in real-time situation awareness prediction.
Situation awareness (SA)-an operator's perception, comprehension, and projection of goal-critical information-is fundamental to the safety and performance of human operators. Recent advances in autonomous systems can reduce operator SA, so researchers have sought real-time, nondisruptive indicators of SA to enable SA-based adaptive cooperation in human-autonomy teams. However, gold-standard freeze-probe measures of SA are not validated for use as ground truth in real-time predictive models. Working memory constraints force single-trial measures to be partial by nature. Existing workarounds smooth over temporal dynamics, precluding real-time predictive models. This work shows that a 3-trial moving average SA score reduces measurement noise while preserving temporal information. Moving average scores are more strongly correlated (r = 0.36, p < 0.01) with performance than single trial SA scores and can be predicted by single-trial physiological signals with greater accuracy (standardized mean absolute error = 0.61, Q2 = 0.36) than single trial SA scores.
期刊介绍:
Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives.
The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people.
All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.