访问的时间变化:使用全国住院患者样本调查住院患者使用电痉挛治疗(ECT)的时间。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Anisha Kohli, Haley Schuster, Ryan W Walters, Imad Alsakaf
{"title":"访问的时间变化:使用全国住院患者样本调查住院患者使用电痉挛治疗(ECT)的时间。","authors":"Anisha Kohli, Haley Schuster, Ryan W Walters, Imad Alsakaf","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000001180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined temporal trends and sociodemographic variations in time-to-electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) administration among inpatients with psychiatric conditions for which ECT is indicated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2021. Hospitalizations of adults with a primary diagnosis of major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, noncatatonic schizophrenia, or catatonia who received ECT were included. Outcomes assessed included time to first ECT session, hospitalization length, discharge disposition, costs, and complications. Mixed-effects negative binomial regression was used to evaluate differences in time-to-ECT by age, biological sex, primary insurance, income quartile, and health-related social needs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2016 to 2021, ECT-utilizing hospitalizations declined, while the time to first ECT session increased by 24.6% from 7.3 days in 2016 to 9.1 days in 2021. Delays were longest for noncatatonic schizophrenia and catatonia. Sociodemographic variations included significantly longer wait times for Blacks and Hispanics, Medicaid beneficiaries, and those with housing insecurity or unemployment. Hospitalizations that included older patients experienced longer delays, whereas rural hospitals reported shorter wait times.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant delays in ECT administration exist, particularly for vulnerable populations and less common indications. These findings underscore the need for interventions to address systemic barriers and improve equitable access to timely ECT.</p>","PeriodicalId":54844,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ect","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal Variations in Access: Investigating Time-to-Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Utilization Among Inpatients Using the National Inpatient Sample.\",\"authors\":\"Anisha Kohli, Haley Schuster, Ryan W Walters, Imad Alsakaf\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/YCT.0000000000001180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined temporal trends and sociodemographic variations in time-to-electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) administration among inpatients with psychiatric conditions for which ECT is indicated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2021. Hospitalizations of adults with a primary diagnosis of major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, noncatatonic schizophrenia, or catatonia who received ECT were included. Outcomes assessed included time to first ECT session, hospitalization length, discharge disposition, costs, and complications. Mixed-effects negative binomial regression was used to evaluate differences in time-to-ECT by age, biological sex, primary insurance, income quartile, and health-related social needs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2016 to 2021, ECT-utilizing hospitalizations declined, while the time to first ECT session increased by 24.6% from 7.3 days in 2016 to 9.1 days in 2021. Delays were longest for noncatatonic schizophrenia and catatonia. Sociodemographic variations included significantly longer wait times for Blacks and Hispanics, Medicaid beneficiaries, and those with housing insecurity or unemployment. Hospitalizations that included older patients experienced longer delays, whereas rural hospitals reported shorter wait times.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant delays in ECT administration exist, particularly for vulnerable populations and less common indications. These findings underscore the need for interventions to address systemic barriers and improve equitable access to timely ECT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ect\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000001180\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ect","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000001180","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究考察了有电痉挛治疗指征的精神疾病住院患者电痉挛治疗时间的时间趋势和社会人口统计学变化。方法:利用2016年至2021年全国住院患者样本数据库进行回顾性分析。主要诊断为重度抑郁症、双相情感障碍、分裂情感障碍、非紧张性精神分裂症或紧张性精神分裂症并接受ECT治疗的成人住院病例被纳入研究。评估的结果包括第一次ECT治疗的时间、住院时间、出院处理、费用和并发症。使用混合效应负二项回归来评估年龄、生理性别、基本保险、收入四分位数和与健康相关的社会需求在ect治疗时间上的差异。结果:从2016年到2021年,ECT住院率下降,而第一次ECT治疗的时间从2016年的7.3天增加到2021年的9.1天,增加了24.6%。非紧张性精神分裂症和紧张症患者延迟时间最长。社会人口统计差异包括黑人和西班牙裔、医疗补助受益人、住房不安全或失业的人等待时间明显更长。包括老年患者在内的住院经历了更长时间的延误,而农村医院报告的等待时间较短。结论:存在明显的电痉挛治疗延迟,特别是对于弱势人群和不常见的适应症。这些发现强调需要采取干预措施,以解决系统性障碍并改善公平获得及时电痉挛治疗的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temporal Variations in Access: Investigating Time-to-Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Utilization Among Inpatients Using the National Inpatient Sample.

Objectives: This study examined temporal trends and sociodemographic variations in time-to-electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) administration among inpatients with psychiatric conditions for which ECT is indicated.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2021. Hospitalizations of adults with a primary diagnosis of major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, noncatatonic schizophrenia, or catatonia who received ECT were included. Outcomes assessed included time to first ECT session, hospitalization length, discharge disposition, costs, and complications. Mixed-effects negative binomial regression was used to evaluate differences in time-to-ECT by age, biological sex, primary insurance, income quartile, and health-related social needs.

Results: From 2016 to 2021, ECT-utilizing hospitalizations declined, while the time to first ECT session increased by 24.6% from 7.3 days in 2016 to 9.1 days in 2021. Delays were longest for noncatatonic schizophrenia and catatonia. Sociodemographic variations included significantly longer wait times for Blacks and Hispanics, Medicaid beneficiaries, and those with housing insecurity or unemployment. Hospitalizations that included older patients experienced longer delays, whereas rural hospitals reported shorter wait times.

Conclusions: Significant delays in ECT administration exist, particularly for vulnerable populations and less common indications. These findings underscore the need for interventions to address systemic barriers and improve equitable access to timely ECT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ect
Journal of Ect 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of ECT covers all aspects of contemporary electroconvulsive therapy, reporting on major clinical and research developments worldwide. Leading clinicians and researchers examine the effects of induced seizures on behavior and on organ systems; review important research results on the mode of induction, occurrence, and propagation of seizures; and explore the difficult sociological, ethical, and legal issues concerning the use of ECT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信