Ioannis Perros, Balamrit Singh Sokhal, Christopher Swift, Mark Kitchen, Christian Mallen, Bhaskar Somani
{"title":"无菌水注射用于肾绞痛的镇痛:一级证据的荟萃分析。","authors":"Ioannis Perros, Balamrit Singh Sokhal, Christopher Swift, Mark Kitchen, Christian Mallen, Bhaskar Somani","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05920-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of Sterile water injections (SWIs) for acute pain relief in renal colic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane were searched to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SWIs with placebo or other analgesics in renal colic patients. Data were pooled and analysed using random effects modelling with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs including 1322 renal colic patients were included, with 466 (35.2%) receiving SWIs. Patients receiving SWIs had comparable demographics and presenting features to the control groups, with control medications ranging from placebos, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, and opioids. Self-reported pain scores at 30 min following intervention were lower in SWI than placebo (MD = - 4.63, 95% CI: - 5.16, - 4.10, P < 0.001) and other analgesics (MD = - 0.36, 95% CI: - 0.52, - 0.21, P < 0.001). The use of rescue analgesia was lower in those receiving SWIs compared to placebo (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.59, P = 0.002) and other analgesics (OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.29, 0.74, P = 0.001). No significant side effects were attributed to SWI use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SWIs demonstrated superior pain relief and reduced rescue analgesia requirements, compared to placebo and standard treatment, offering a promising alternative for patients where traditional options are unsuitable.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"557"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12441071/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sterile water injections for analgesia in renal colic: a meta-analysis of level 1 evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Ioannis Perros, Balamrit Singh Sokhal, Christopher Swift, Mark Kitchen, Christian Mallen, Bhaskar Somani\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00345-025-05920-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of Sterile water injections (SWIs) for acute pain relief in renal colic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane were searched to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SWIs with placebo or other analgesics in renal colic patients. Data were pooled and analysed using random effects modelling with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs including 1322 renal colic patients were included, with 466 (35.2%) receiving SWIs. Patients receiving SWIs had comparable demographics and presenting features to the control groups, with control medications ranging from placebos, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, and opioids. Self-reported pain scores at 30 min following intervention were lower in SWI than placebo (MD = - 4.63, 95% CI: - 5.16, - 4.10, P < 0.001) and other analgesics (MD = - 0.36, 95% CI: - 0.52, - 0.21, P < 0.001). The use of rescue analgesia was lower in those receiving SWIs compared to placebo (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.59, P = 0.002) and other analgesics (OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.29, 0.74, P = 0.001). No significant side effects were attributed to SWI use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SWIs demonstrated superior pain relief and reduced rescue analgesia requirements, compared to placebo and standard treatment, offering a promising alternative for patients where traditional options are unsuitable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"557\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12441071/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05920-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05920-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sterile water injections for analgesia in renal colic: a meta-analysis of level 1 evidence.
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of Sterile water injections (SWIs) for acute pain relief in renal colic.
Methods: This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane were searched to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SWIs with placebo or other analgesics in renal colic patients. Data were pooled and analysed using random effects modelling with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: Six RCTs including 1322 renal colic patients were included, with 466 (35.2%) receiving SWIs. Patients receiving SWIs had comparable demographics and presenting features to the control groups, with control medications ranging from placebos, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, and opioids. Self-reported pain scores at 30 min following intervention were lower in SWI than placebo (MD = - 4.63, 95% CI: - 5.16, - 4.10, P < 0.001) and other analgesics (MD = - 0.36, 95% CI: - 0.52, - 0.21, P < 0.001). The use of rescue analgesia was lower in those receiving SWIs compared to placebo (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.59, P = 0.002) and other analgesics (OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.29, 0.74, P = 0.001). No significant side effects were attributed to SWI use.
Conclusions: SWIs demonstrated superior pain relief and reduced rescue analgesia requirements, compared to placebo and standard treatment, offering a promising alternative for patients where traditional options are unsuitable.
期刊介绍:
The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.