高复用组织成像中分割误差对下游分析的影响。

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
PLoS Computational Biology Pub Date : 2025-09-15 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013350
Matthias Bruhns, Jan T Schleicher, Maximilian Wirth, Marcello Zago, Sepideh Babaei, Manfred Claassen
{"title":"高复用组织成像中分割误差对下游分析的影响。","authors":"Matthias Bruhns, Jan T Schleicher, Maximilian Wirth, Marcello Zago, Sepideh Babaei, Manfred Claassen","doi":"10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Highly multiplexed single-cell imaging technologies have revolutionized our ability to capture spatial protein expression at the single-cell level, thereby enabling a deeper understanding of tissue organization and function. However, these advancements rely on accurate cell segmentation, which defines cell boundaries to generate expression profiles. Despite its importance, there is a gap in quantifying how segmentation inaccuracies propagate through analytical pipelines, particularly affecting cell clustering and phenotyping. We introduce a framework that uses affine transformations to simulate realistic segmentation errors. Our approach mimics the variations induced by segmentation algorithms, allowing us to evaluate the robustness of downstream analyses under controlled perturbation conditions. We show that even moderate segmentation errors can significantly distort estimated protein profiles and disrupt cellular neighborhood relationships in feature space. Effects are most pronounced in clustering analyses, where both unsupervised k-Means and graph-based Leiden algorithms exhibit reduced consistency with increasing perturbation - especially with smaller neighborhood sizes. Similarly, cell phenotyping via Gaussian Mixture Models is adversely impacted, with higher levels of segmentation error leading to notable misclassifications between closely related cell types. These results highlight the importance of ensuring high-quality segmentation and careful data processing strategies to mitigate spurious results for downstream analysis tasks. Considering segmentation inaccuracies, possibly in a probabilistic modeling framework, will improve the reliability and reproducibility of findings in multiplexed tissue imaging studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20241,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Computational Biology","volume":"21 9","pages":"e1013350"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of segmentation errors on downstream-analysis in highly-multiplexed tissue imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Bruhns, Jan T Schleicher, Maximilian Wirth, Marcello Zago, Sepideh Babaei, Manfred Claassen\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Highly multiplexed single-cell imaging technologies have revolutionized our ability to capture spatial protein expression at the single-cell level, thereby enabling a deeper understanding of tissue organization and function. However, these advancements rely on accurate cell segmentation, which defines cell boundaries to generate expression profiles. Despite its importance, there is a gap in quantifying how segmentation inaccuracies propagate through analytical pipelines, particularly affecting cell clustering and phenotyping. We introduce a framework that uses affine transformations to simulate realistic segmentation errors. Our approach mimics the variations induced by segmentation algorithms, allowing us to evaluate the robustness of downstream analyses under controlled perturbation conditions. We show that even moderate segmentation errors can significantly distort estimated protein profiles and disrupt cellular neighborhood relationships in feature space. Effects are most pronounced in clustering analyses, where both unsupervised k-Means and graph-based Leiden algorithms exhibit reduced consistency with increasing perturbation - especially with smaller neighborhood sizes. Similarly, cell phenotyping via Gaussian Mixture Models is adversely impacted, with higher levels of segmentation error leading to notable misclassifications between closely related cell types. These results highlight the importance of ensuring high-quality segmentation and careful data processing strategies to mitigate spurious results for downstream analysis tasks. Considering segmentation inaccuracies, possibly in a probabilistic modeling framework, will improve the reliability and reproducibility of findings in multiplexed tissue imaging studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS Computational Biology\",\"volume\":\"21 9\",\"pages\":\"e1013350\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456762/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS Computational Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013350\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Computational Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013350","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高度复用的单细胞成像技术彻底改变了我们在单细胞水平上捕获空间蛋白表达的能力,从而使我们能够更深入地了解组织组织和功能。然而,这些进步依赖于精确的细胞分割,它定义了细胞边界来生成表达谱。尽管它很重要,但在量化分割不准确性如何通过分析管道传播方面存在差距,特别是影响细胞聚类和表型。我们引入了一个使用仿射变换来模拟真实分割错误的框架。我们的方法模拟了由分割算法引起的变化,使我们能够在受控扰动条件下评估下游分析的鲁棒性。我们表明,即使是适度的分割错误也会显著扭曲估计的蛋白质谱,并破坏特征空间中的细胞邻域关系。这种影响在聚类分析中最为明显,在聚类分析中,无监督k-Means和基于图的Leiden算法都表现出随着扰动的增加而降低的一致性,尤其是在较小的邻域大小下。同样,通过高斯混合模型进行的细胞表型也会受到不利影响,更高水平的分割错误会导致密切相关的细胞类型之间出现明显的错误分类。这些结果强调了确保高质量分割和仔细的数据处理策略的重要性,以减轻下游分析任务的虚假结果。考虑到分割不准确,可能在概率建模框架,将提高可靠性和可重复性的结果在多路组织成像研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of segmentation errors on downstream-analysis in highly-multiplexed tissue imaging.

Highly multiplexed single-cell imaging technologies have revolutionized our ability to capture spatial protein expression at the single-cell level, thereby enabling a deeper understanding of tissue organization and function. However, these advancements rely on accurate cell segmentation, which defines cell boundaries to generate expression profiles. Despite its importance, there is a gap in quantifying how segmentation inaccuracies propagate through analytical pipelines, particularly affecting cell clustering and phenotyping. We introduce a framework that uses affine transformations to simulate realistic segmentation errors. Our approach mimics the variations induced by segmentation algorithms, allowing us to evaluate the robustness of downstream analyses under controlled perturbation conditions. We show that even moderate segmentation errors can significantly distort estimated protein profiles and disrupt cellular neighborhood relationships in feature space. Effects are most pronounced in clustering analyses, where both unsupervised k-Means and graph-based Leiden algorithms exhibit reduced consistency with increasing perturbation - especially with smaller neighborhood sizes. Similarly, cell phenotyping via Gaussian Mixture Models is adversely impacted, with higher levels of segmentation error leading to notable misclassifications between closely related cell types. These results highlight the importance of ensuring high-quality segmentation and careful data processing strategies to mitigate spurious results for downstream analysis tasks. Considering segmentation inaccuracies, possibly in a probabilistic modeling framework, will improve the reliability and reproducibility of findings in multiplexed tissue imaging studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS Computational Biology
PLoS Computational Biology BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.70%
发文量
820
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: PLOS Computational Biology features works of exceptional significance that further our understanding of living systems at all scales—from molecules and cells, to patient populations and ecosystems—through the application of computational methods. Readers include life and computational scientists, who can take the important findings presented here to the next level of discovery. Research articles must be declared as belonging to a relevant section. More information about the sections can be found in the submission guidelines. Research articles should model aspects of biological systems, demonstrate both methodological and scientific novelty, and provide profound new biological insights. Generally, reliability and significance of biological discovery through computation should be validated and enriched by experimental studies. Inclusion of experimental validation is not required for publication, but should be referenced where possible. Inclusion of experimental validation of a modest biological discovery through computation does not render a manuscript suitable for PLOS Computational Biology. Research articles specifically designated as Methods papers should describe outstanding methods of exceptional importance that have been shown, or have the promise to provide new biological insights. The method must already be widely adopted, or have the promise of wide adoption by a broad community of users. Enhancements to existing published methods will only be considered if those enhancements bring exceptional new capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信