提高患者眼科知识的干预措施:系统回顾和叙述综合。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Dayyanah Sumodhee, Estelle Ioannidou, Rishi Ramessur, Jai Prashar, Mohammed Abbas, Konstantinos Balaskas, Nikolas Pontikos, Peter Thomas
{"title":"提高患者眼科知识的干预措施:系统回顾和叙述综合。","authors":"Dayyanah Sumodhee, Estelle Ioannidou, Rishi Ramessur, Jai Prashar, Mohammed Abbas, Konstantinos Balaskas, Nikolas Pontikos, Peter Thomas","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Low eye health knowledge is associated with suboptimal treatment adherence, self-care practice and follow-up rate leading to poorer outcomes. The aim of this review was to survey what interventions are effective at improving patients' knowledge of eye disease and treatments. Randomised controlled trials and cross-sectional studies delivering interventions to improve patients' knowledge about eye diseases were reviewed. Databases, grey literature, reference lists and journals were searched for relevant studies. Three authors reviewed and extracted the data and assessed quality. Seventeen publications were included examining different types of interventions. Thirteen studies showed significant improvements on patients' eye disease knowledge following intervention. These included all 5 verbal interventions, 5 out of 6 video interventions, 5 out of 8 written or image material interventions, and 1 out of 2 using other formats. Study quality varied, with 7 studies rated as having low risks of bias, 8 moderate, and 2 high. Intervention design varied considerably across studies, making comparisons challenging. Interventions to improve patients' knowledge of eye conditions show promising results in particular verbal and video interventions; however, higher quality studies, as well as standardisation of reporting and intervention formats, are required to strengthen the evidence base.</p>","PeriodicalId":22102,"journal":{"name":"Survey of ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions to improve patients' knowledge in ophthalmology: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Dayyanah Sumodhee, Estelle Ioannidou, Rishi Ramessur, Jai Prashar, Mohammed Abbas, Konstantinos Balaskas, Nikolas Pontikos, Peter Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.09.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Low eye health knowledge is associated with suboptimal treatment adherence, self-care practice and follow-up rate leading to poorer outcomes. The aim of this review was to survey what interventions are effective at improving patients' knowledge of eye disease and treatments. Randomised controlled trials and cross-sectional studies delivering interventions to improve patients' knowledge about eye diseases were reviewed. Databases, grey literature, reference lists and journals were searched for relevant studies. Three authors reviewed and extracted the data and assessed quality. Seventeen publications were included examining different types of interventions. Thirteen studies showed significant improvements on patients' eye disease knowledge following intervention. These included all 5 verbal interventions, 5 out of 6 video interventions, 5 out of 8 written or image material interventions, and 1 out of 2 using other formats. Study quality varied, with 7 studies rated as having low risks of bias, 8 moderate, and 2 high. Intervention design varied considerably across studies, making comparisons challenging. Interventions to improve patients' knowledge of eye conditions show promising results in particular verbal and video interventions; however, higher quality studies, as well as standardisation of reporting and intervention formats, are required to strengthen the evidence base.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Survey of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Survey of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.09.006\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.09.006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

低眼保健知识与次优治疗依从性、自我保健实践和随访率相关,导致较差的结果。本综述的目的是调查哪些干预措施可以有效地提高患者对眼病和治疗的认识。综述了提供干预措施以提高患者眼病知识的随机对照试验和横断面研究。检索数据库、灰色文献、参考文献表和期刊,查找相关研究。三位作者对数据进行了审查和提取,并对质量进行了评估。17份出版物审查了不同类型的干预措施。13项研究表明,干预后患者对眼病的认识有了显著提高。这些包括所有5个口头干预,6个视频干预中的5个,8个书面或图像材料干预中的5个,以及2个使用其他格式的1个。研究质量各不相同,7项研究被评为低偏倚风险,8项为中等偏倚风险,2项为高偏倚风险。不同研究的干预设计差异很大,使得比较具有挑战性。提高患者眼病知识的干预措施,特别是口头和视频干预显示出有希望的结果;然而,需要更高质量的研究以及报告和干预格式的标准化来加强证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interventions to improve patients' knowledge in ophthalmology: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Low eye health knowledge is associated with suboptimal treatment adherence, self-care practice and follow-up rate leading to poorer outcomes. The aim of this review was to survey what interventions are effective at improving patients' knowledge of eye disease and treatments. Randomised controlled trials and cross-sectional studies delivering interventions to improve patients' knowledge about eye diseases were reviewed. Databases, grey literature, reference lists and journals were searched for relevant studies. Three authors reviewed and extracted the data and assessed quality. Seventeen publications were included examining different types of interventions. Thirteen studies showed significant improvements on patients' eye disease knowledge following intervention. These included all 5 verbal interventions, 5 out of 6 video interventions, 5 out of 8 written or image material interventions, and 1 out of 2 using other formats. Study quality varied, with 7 studies rated as having low risks of bias, 8 moderate, and 2 high. Intervention design varied considerably across studies, making comparisons challenging. Interventions to improve patients' knowledge of eye conditions show promising results in particular verbal and video interventions; however, higher quality studies, as well as standardisation of reporting and intervention formats, are required to strengthen the evidence base.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Survey of ophthalmology
Survey of ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
14.8 weeks
期刊介绍: Survey of Ophthalmology is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance. Survey also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信