助产士性别发育差异胎儿性别及产前诊断的研究进展。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Prenatal Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-09-15 DOI:10.1002/pd.6889
Madeline Dingle, Sharon Aufox, Emilie K Johnson, Jeffrey S Dungan, Aimee Clark, Katie Abihider, Allison Goetsch Weisman
{"title":"助产士性别发育差异胎儿性别及产前诊断的研究进展。","authors":"Madeline Dingle, Sharon Aufox, Emilie K Johnson, Jeffrey S Dungan, Aimee Clark, Katie Abihider, Allison Goetsch Weisman","doi":"10.1002/pd.6889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cell-free DNA screening has increased prenatal diagnosis/suspicion of fetal differences of sex development (DSD). This study explored how midwives discuss fetal sex and possible DSD with pregnant patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Active members of the American College of Nurse-Midwives were surveyed electronically to assess terminology use when discussing fetal sex and DSD, terminology influences, and comfort and preparedness levels when discussing a fetal DSD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants (59.1%) reported a preference for use of gender-specific language (e.g., baby boy or baby girl) when disclosing predicted fetal sex results, often reflecting language used by patients. However, use of non-gendered language increased (40.9% vs. 76.2%) with suspicion of fetal DSD. Participants reported discomfort (41.9%) and unpreparedness (48.1%) when disclosing results related to genital variation. Additionally, some participants reported comfort with using terminology that may be inappropriate or outdated when discussing DSD (e.g., hermaphrodite, 16%). While a minority of participants (20.3%) reported having prior education about DSD, most participants (81.7%) desired education on this topic. Notably, participants with prior DSD education consistently expressed higher levels of preparedness for discussing DSD compared with those who did not receive this education.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings underscore the importance of DSD education for midwives to increase knowledge, comfort, and preparedness in this area of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives on Fetal Sex and Prenatal Diagnosis of Differences of Sex Development Among Midwives.\",\"authors\":\"Madeline Dingle, Sharon Aufox, Emilie K Johnson, Jeffrey S Dungan, Aimee Clark, Katie Abihider, Allison Goetsch Weisman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pd.6889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cell-free DNA screening has increased prenatal diagnosis/suspicion of fetal differences of sex development (DSD). This study explored how midwives discuss fetal sex and possible DSD with pregnant patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Active members of the American College of Nurse-Midwives were surveyed electronically to assess terminology use when discussing fetal sex and DSD, terminology influences, and comfort and preparedness levels when discussing a fetal DSD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants (59.1%) reported a preference for use of gender-specific language (e.g., baby boy or baby girl) when disclosing predicted fetal sex results, often reflecting language used by patients. However, use of non-gendered language increased (40.9% vs. 76.2%) with suspicion of fetal DSD. Participants reported discomfort (41.9%) and unpreparedness (48.1%) when disclosing results related to genital variation. Additionally, some participants reported comfort with using terminology that may be inappropriate or outdated when discussing DSD (e.g., hermaphrodite, 16%). While a minority of participants (20.3%) reported having prior education about DSD, most participants (81.7%) desired education on this topic. Notably, participants with prior DSD education consistently expressed higher levels of preparedness for discussing DSD compared with those who did not receive this education.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings underscore the importance of DSD education for midwives to increase knowledge, comfort, and preparedness in this area of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prenatal Diagnosis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prenatal Diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6889\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6889","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:无细胞DNA筛查增加了胎儿性别发育差异(DSD)的产前诊断/怀疑。本研究探讨了助产士如何与孕妇讨论胎儿性别和可能的DSD。方法:对美国护士助产士学院的活跃成员进行电子调查,以评估讨论胎儿性别和DSD时术语的使用情况,术语的影响,以及讨论胎儿DSD时的舒适度和准备程度。结果:大多数参与者(59.1%)报告说,在透露预测胎儿性别结果时,倾向于使用特定性别的语言(例如,男婴或女婴),通常反映患者使用的语言。然而,怀疑胎儿DSD时,非性别语言的使用增加(40.9%对76.2%)。当披露与生殖器变异有关的结果时,参与者报告不适(41.9%)和准备不足(48.1%)。此外,一些参与者报告说,在讨论DSD时,使用可能不合适或过时的术语(例如,雌雄同体,16%)是舒适的。虽然少数参与者(20.3%)表示之前接受过有关DSD的教育,但大多数参与者(81.7%)希望接受这方面的教育。值得注意的是,与没有接受过这种教育的参与者相比,受过DSD教育的参与者在讨论DSD时始终表现出更高的准备水平。结论:研究结果强调了DSD教育对助产士的重要性,以增加这一领域的护理知识,舒适度和准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perspectives on Fetal Sex and Prenatal Diagnosis of Differences of Sex Development Among Midwives.

Objective: Cell-free DNA screening has increased prenatal diagnosis/suspicion of fetal differences of sex development (DSD). This study explored how midwives discuss fetal sex and possible DSD with pregnant patients.

Method: Active members of the American College of Nurse-Midwives were surveyed electronically to assess terminology use when discussing fetal sex and DSD, terminology influences, and comfort and preparedness levels when discussing a fetal DSD.

Results: Most participants (59.1%) reported a preference for use of gender-specific language (e.g., baby boy or baby girl) when disclosing predicted fetal sex results, often reflecting language used by patients. However, use of non-gendered language increased (40.9% vs. 76.2%) with suspicion of fetal DSD. Participants reported discomfort (41.9%) and unpreparedness (48.1%) when disclosing results related to genital variation. Additionally, some participants reported comfort with using terminology that may be inappropriate or outdated when discussing DSD (e.g., hermaphrodite, 16%). While a minority of participants (20.3%) reported having prior education about DSD, most participants (81.7%) desired education on this topic. Notably, participants with prior DSD education consistently expressed higher levels of preparedness for discussing DSD compared with those who did not receive this education.

Conclusion: Findings underscore the importance of DSD education for midwives to increase knowledge, comfort, and preparedness in this area of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信