调查患者对ChatGPT作为健康信息资源的看法:一项定性研究。

IF 1.4 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Miznah Hizam AlShammary, Norah Mohammed Alyahya, Eman M Alanazi, Abdullah Aldaeej, Aljouharah Mohammed Alanazi, Walaa Hassan, Tamer Farag, Sager Mohammed Alanazi, Hamad Mohammed Al Otaibi, Salem Albagmi, Wejdan M Arif, Amal Mubarak Bakhshwain, Afnan Fahd Almuhanna, Fahad Alanezi
{"title":"调查患者对ChatGPT作为健康信息资源的看法:一项定性研究。","authors":"Miznah Hizam AlShammary, Norah Mohammed Alyahya, Eman M Alanazi, Abdullah Aldaeej, Aljouharah Mohammed Alanazi, Walaa Hassan, Tamer Farag, Sager Mohammed Alanazi, Hamad Mohammed Al Otaibi, Salem Albagmi, Wejdan M Arif, Amal Mubarak Bakhshwain, Afnan Fahd Almuhanna, Fahad Alanezi","doi":"10.1177/02601060251376091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe rapid adoption of artificial intelligence-powered tools like ChatGPT has introduced new avenues for patients to access health information independently. Understanding how patients perceive and engage with such tools is essential to evaluating their trustworthiness, usability, and potential impact on health decision-making.AimThe purpose of this study is to investigate the facilitators and barriers of using ChatGPT as a health information resource for patients' health management.MethodsA qualitative research design was adopted in this study. The participants included outpatients at a public hospital. Participants interacted with ChatGPT (version 3.5) for at least 15 min daily over 2 weeks to explore health-related topics before participating in semi-structured interviews. A total of 28 outpatients participated in the interviews.ResultsThe findings from this study have indicated both positive and negative aspects of ChatGPT as a health information resource. Among the 28 participants, the most frequently reported facilitators included improved health literacy (reported by 26 participants, 92.9%), effectiveness and efficiency (24 participants, 85.7%), cost-effectiveness (23 participants, 82.1%), accessibility (17 participants, 60.7%), empowerment (13 participants, 46.4%), and anonymity (11 participants, 39.3%). Reported barriers included lack of personalized information (15 participants, 53.6%), limited reliability (9 participants, 32.1%), restricted diagnostic capability (6 participants, 21.4%), lack of human interaction (14 participants, 50%), privacy concerns (4 participants, 14.3%), legal and ethical issues (9 participants, 32.1%), and lack of emotional support (3 participants, 10.7%).ConclusionAlthough ChatGPT has significant benefits of being used as a health information resource, to arrive at specific conclusions, there is a need to extend these kinds of studies across the regions to assess the impact of ChatGPT on different populations for promoting health literacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19352,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and health","volume":" ","pages":"2601060251376091"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating patients' perceptions of ChatGPT as a health information resource: A qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Miznah Hizam AlShammary, Norah Mohammed Alyahya, Eman M Alanazi, Abdullah Aldaeej, Aljouharah Mohammed Alanazi, Walaa Hassan, Tamer Farag, Sager Mohammed Alanazi, Hamad Mohammed Al Otaibi, Salem Albagmi, Wejdan M Arif, Amal Mubarak Bakhshwain, Afnan Fahd Almuhanna, Fahad Alanezi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02601060251376091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundThe rapid adoption of artificial intelligence-powered tools like ChatGPT has introduced new avenues for patients to access health information independently. Understanding how patients perceive and engage with such tools is essential to evaluating their trustworthiness, usability, and potential impact on health decision-making.AimThe purpose of this study is to investigate the facilitators and barriers of using ChatGPT as a health information resource for patients' health management.MethodsA qualitative research design was adopted in this study. The participants included outpatients at a public hospital. Participants interacted with ChatGPT (version 3.5) for at least 15 min daily over 2 weeks to explore health-related topics before participating in semi-structured interviews. A total of 28 outpatients participated in the interviews.ResultsThe findings from this study have indicated both positive and negative aspects of ChatGPT as a health information resource. Among the 28 participants, the most frequently reported facilitators included improved health literacy (reported by 26 participants, 92.9%), effectiveness and efficiency (24 participants, 85.7%), cost-effectiveness (23 participants, 82.1%), accessibility (17 participants, 60.7%), empowerment (13 participants, 46.4%), and anonymity (11 participants, 39.3%). Reported barriers included lack of personalized information (15 participants, 53.6%), limited reliability (9 participants, 32.1%), restricted diagnostic capability (6 participants, 21.4%), lack of human interaction (14 participants, 50%), privacy concerns (4 participants, 14.3%), legal and ethical issues (9 participants, 32.1%), and lack of emotional support (3 participants, 10.7%).ConclusionAlthough ChatGPT has significant benefits of being used as a health information resource, to arrive at specific conclusions, there is a need to extend these kinds of studies across the regions to assess the impact of ChatGPT on different populations for promoting health literacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition and health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2601060251376091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060251376091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060251376091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ChatGPT等人工智能工具的迅速普及为患者提供了独立获取健康信息的新途径。了解患者如何感知和使用这些工具对于评估其可信度、可用性和对健康决策的潜在影响至关重要。目的探讨ChatGPT作为健康信息资源在患者健康管理中的促进因素和障碍。方法本研究采用定性研究设计。参与者包括公立医院的门诊病人。在参加半结构化访谈之前,参与者在两周内每天至少与ChatGPT(3.5版本)进行15分钟的互动,以探索与健康相关的主题。共有28名门诊患者参与了访谈。结果本研究的结果表明了ChatGPT作为健康信息资源的积极和消极方面。在28名参与者中,最常报告的促进因素包括提高健康素养(26名参与者报告,占92.9%)、有效性和效率(24名参与者报告,占85.7%)、成本效益(23名参与者报告,占82.1%)、可及性(17名参与者报告,占60.7%)、赋权(13名参与者报告,占46.4%)和匿名(11名参与者报告,占39.3%)。报告的障碍包括缺乏个性化信息(15名参与者,53.6%)、有限的可靠性(9名参与者,32.1%)、有限的诊断能力(6名参与者,21.4%)、缺乏人际互动(14名参与者,50%)、隐私问题(4名参与者,14.3%)、法律和道德问题(9名参与者,32.1%)和缺乏情感支持(3名参与者,10.7%)。尽管ChatGPT作为一种卫生信息资源具有显著的好处,但为了得出具体的结论,有必要将这类研究扩展到不同地区,以评估ChatGPT对不同人群促进卫生素养的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating patients' perceptions of ChatGPT as a health information resource: A qualitative study.

BackgroundThe rapid adoption of artificial intelligence-powered tools like ChatGPT has introduced new avenues for patients to access health information independently. Understanding how patients perceive and engage with such tools is essential to evaluating their trustworthiness, usability, and potential impact on health decision-making.AimThe purpose of this study is to investigate the facilitators and barriers of using ChatGPT as a health information resource for patients' health management.MethodsA qualitative research design was adopted in this study. The participants included outpatients at a public hospital. Participants interacted with ChatGPT (version 3.5) for at least 15 min daily over 2 weeks to explore health-related topics before participating in semi-structured interviews. A total of 28 outpatients participated in the interviews.ResultsThe findings from this study have indicated both positive and negative aspects of ChatGPT as a health information resource. Among the 28 participants, the most frequently reported facilitators included improved health literacy (reported by 26 participants, 92.9%), effectiveness and efficiency (24 participants, 85.7%), cost-effectiveness (23 participants, 82.1%), accessibility (17 participants, 60.7%), empowerment (13 participants, 46.4%), and anonymity (11 participants, 39.3%). Reported barriers included lack of personalized information (15 participants, 53.6%), limited reliability (9 participants, 32.1%), restricted diagnostic capability (6 participants, 21.4%), lack of human interaction (14 participants, 50%), privacy concerns (4 participants, 14.3%), legal and ethical issues (9 participants, 32.1%), and lack of emotional support (3 participants, 10.7%).ConclusionAlthough ChatGPT has significant benefits of being used as a health information resource, to arrive at specific conclusions, there is a need to extend these kinds of studies across the regions to assess the impact of ChatGPT on different populations for promoting health literacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition and health
Nutrition and health Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信