{"title":"日本Kampo Goreisan治疗复发性慢性硬膜下血肿患者的中脑膜动脉栓塞:一项前瞻性队列比较研究。","authors":"Yosuke Akamatsu, Kohei Chida, Kenya Miyoshi, Daigo Kojima, Shota Tsutsui, Koji Yoshida, Toshinari Misaki, Takahiro Koji, Shunrou Fujiwara, Hiroshi Kashimura, Kuniaki Ogasawara","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03821-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adjuvant middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) after burr-hole drainage for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) has emerged as a promising strategy. However, in Japan, MMAE is not covered by national health insurance; thus, it has been reserved for patients with recurrent CSDHs after burr-hole drainage. Goreisan has been reported to lower the incidence of recurrent CSDHs. Hence, we investigated the synergistic effect of MMAE and Goreisan in patients with recurrent CSDH. We prospectively included patients with recurrent CSDHs who received Goreisan after burr-hole drainage and separated them into groups based on whether MMAE was performed (group B + G + MMAE) or not (group B + G). Out of 605 patients who underwent burr-hole drainage for CSDHs, groups B + G and B + G + MMAE comprised 20 and 34 consecutive patients, respectively. Patient characteristics, such as age, sex, antithrombotic medications, history of blood coagulopathy disorders, and the modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores before symptom onset, did not differ between the two groups. No significant differences in the incidence of re-recurrent CSDHs (5% and 5.8%, in groups B + G and B + G + MMAE, p > 0.05, respectively) and favorable functional outcome (mRS score ≤ 2) at 3-month retreatment (90% and 76.5% in groups B + G and B + G + MMAE, p > 0.05, respectively) were found in the two groups 3 months post-retreatment. A positive effect of MMAE in preventing the re-recurrence of CSDHs in patients treated with Goreisan for recurrent CSDHs was not observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"643"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Middle meningeal artery embolization in patients treated with Japanese Kampo Goreisan for recurrent chronic subdural hematoma: a prospective cohort comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Yosuke Akamatsu, Kohei Chida, Kenya Miyoshi, Daigo Kojima, Shota Tsutsui, Koji Yoshida, Toshinari Misaki, Takahiro Koji, Shunrou Fujiwara, Hiroshi Kashimura, Kuniaki Ogasawara\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10143-025-03821-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adjuvant middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) after burr-hole drainage for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) has emerged as a promising strategy. However, in Japan, MMAE is not covered by national health insurance; thus, it has been reserved for patients with recurrent CSDHs after burr-hole drainage. Goreisan has been reported to lower the incidence of recurrent CSDHs. Hence, we investigated the synergistic effect of MMAE and Goreisan in patients with recurrent CSDH. We prospectively included patients with recurrent CSDHs who received Goreisan after burr-hole drainage and separated them into groups based on whether MMAE was performed (group B + G + MMAE) or not (group B + G). Out of 605 patients who underwent burr-hole drainage for CSDHs, groups B + G and B + G + MMAE comprised 20 and 34 consecutive patients, respectively. Patient characteristics, such as age, sex, antithrombotic medications, history of blood coagulopathy disorders, and the modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores before symptom onset, did not differ between the two groups. No significant differences in the incidence of re-recurrent CSDHs (5% and 5.8%, in groups B + G and B + G + MMAE, p > 0.05, respectively) and favorable functional outcome (mRS score ≤ 2) at 3-month retreatment (90% and 76.5% in groups B + G and B + G + MMAE, p > 0.05, respectively) were found in the two groups 3 months post-retreatment. A positive effect of MMAE in preventing the re-recurrence of CSDHs in patients treated with Goreisan for recurrent CSDHs was not observed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"643\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03821-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03821-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)钻孔引流后辅助脑膜中动脉栓塞(MMAE)已成为一种有前途的策略。然而,在日本,MMAE不包括在国民健康保险范围内;因此,它被保留给穿孔引流后复发的CSDHs患者。据报道,Goreisan可降低CSDHs复发的发生率。因此,我们研究了MMAE和Goreisan在复发性CSDH患者中的协同作用。前瞻性纳入经钻孔引流后接受Goreisan治疗的复发性CSDHs患者,根据是否行MMAE (B + G + MMAE)或未行MMAE (B + G组)分为两组。605例CSDHs钻孔引流患者中,B + G组和B + G + MMAE组分别有20例和34例连续患者。患者特征,如年龄、性别、抗血栓药物、凝血功能障碍史和症状出现前的改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分,在两组之间没有差异。再治疗3个月后,两组CSDHs再复发发生率(B + G组和B + G + MMAE组分别为5%和5.8%,p > 0.05)和良好的功能预后(mRS评分≤2)(B + G组和B + G + MMAE组分别为90%和76.5%,p > 0.05)无显著差异。未观察到MMAE对用Goreisan治疗复发性CSDHs患者预防CSDHs复发的积极作用。
Middle meningeal artery embolization in patients treated with Japanese Kampo Goreisan for recurrent chronic subdural hematoma: a prospective cohort comparative study.
Adjuvant middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) after burr-hole drainage for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) has emerged as a promising strategy. However, in Japan, MMAE is not covered by national health insurance; thus, it has been reserved for patients with recurrent CSDHs after burr-hole drainage. Goreisan has been reported to lower the incidence of recurrent CSDHs. Hence, we investigated the synergistic effect of MMAE and Goreisan in patients with recurrent CSDH. We prospectively included patients with recurrent CSDHs who received Goreisan after burr-hole drainage and separated them into groups based on whether MMAE was performed (group B + G + MMAE) or not (group B + G). Out of 605 patients who underwent burr-hole drainage for CSDHs, groups B + G and B + G + MMAE comprised 20 and 34 consecutive patients, respectively. Patient characteristics, such as age, sex, antithrombotic medications, history of blood coagulopathy disorders, and the modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores before symptom onset, did not differ between the two groups. No significant differences in the incidence of re-recurrent CSDHs (5% and 5.8%, in groups B + G and B + G + MMAE, p > 0.05, respectively) and favorable functional outcome (mRS score ≤ 2) at 3-month retreatment (90% and 76.5% in groups B + G and B + G + MMAE, p > 0.05, respectively) were found in the two groups 3 months post-retreatment. A positive effect of MMAE in preventing the re-recurrence of CSDHs in patients treated with Goreisan for recurrent CSDHs was not observed.
期刊介绍:
The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.