评估在社区中接受创伤后应激障碍护理的退伍军人的协调和护理质量。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
C Laurel Franklin, Amanda M Raines, Chelsea R Ennis, Joseph W Boffa, Ansley M Bender, Mara L Ferrie, Taylor R Nocera, Allison Dornbach-Bender, Dustin A Seidler, Karen D Slaton, Leslie O'Malley, Mary O Shapiro, Garry Laborde
{"title":"评估在社区中接受创伤后应激障碍护理的退伍军人的协调和护理质量。","authors":"C Laurel Franklin, Amanda M Raines, Chelsea R Ennis, Joseph W Boffa, Ansley M Bender, Mara L Ferrie, Taylor R Nocera, Allison Dornbach-Bender, Dustin A Seidler, Karen D Slaton, Leslie O'Malley, Mary O Shapiro, Garry Laborde","doi":"10.1002/jts.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite an increase in the number of veterans receiving posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) care in the community, little work has examined the coordination and quality of care, particularly as it relates to U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) standards. To this end, the current project sought to document community care characteristics among veterans receiving outpatient psychotherapy services for PTSD. Specifically, the coordination of care and congruency with VA standards were examined. Data, which were collected over a 2-year period from a VA hospital in the southeastern United States, included 123 PTSD community care consults across 103 unique veterans (M<sub>age</sub> = 47.80 years, SD = 12.03; 72.4% Male; 50.4% Black). The majority of consults were new referrals for care (62.6%) due to the clinical service not being available or the average drive time to the nearest VA facility exceeding 30 min (77.2%). Regarding the coordination of care, records were not available for 27.6% of consults. Among veterans with treatment records, most were seen for an intake and psychotherapy (38.2%), followed by intake only and psychotherapy only. Formal diagnostic assessments were not documented in any intake records, with 21.2% of psychotherapy records documenting the use of a first-line treatment for PTSD. Notably, most intake records (56.1%) failed to document any assessment of suicide risk, and no psychotherapy records indicated the loss of a PTSD diagnosis. The findings highlight gaps in the coordination and quality of care, particularly as it relates to VA standards, for veterans receiving PTSD care in the community.</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating coordination and quality of care among veterans receiving posttraumatic stress disorder care in the community.\",\"authors\":\"C Laurel Franklin, Amanda M Raines, Chelsea R Ennis, Joseph W Boffa, Ansley M Bender, Mara L Ferrie, Taylor R Nocera, Allison Dornbach-Bender, Dustin A Seidler, Karen D Slaton, Leslie O'Malley, Mary O Shapiro, Garry Laborde\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jts.70012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite an increase in the number of veterans receiving posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) care in the community, little work has examined the coordination and quality of care, particularly as it relates to U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) standards. To this end, the current project sought to document community care characteristics among veterans receiving outpatient psychotherapy services for PTSD. Specifically, the coordination of care and congruency with VA standards were examined. Data, which were collected over a 2-year period from a VA hospital in the southeastern United States, included 123 PTSD community care consults across 103 unique veterans (M<sub>age</sub> = 47.80 years, SD = 12.03; 72.4% Male; 50.4% Black). The majority of consults were new referrals for care (62.6%) due to the clinical service not being available or the average drive time to the nearest VA facility exceeding 30 min (77.2%). Regarding the coordination of care, records were not available for 27.6% of consults. Among veterans with treatment records, most were seen for an intake and psychotherapy (38.2%), followed by intake only and psychotherapy only. Formal diagnostic assessments were not documented in any intake records, with 21.2% of psychotherapy records documenting the use of a first-line treatment for PTSD. Notably, most intake records (56.1%) failed to document any assessment of suicide risk, and no psychotherapy records indicated the loss of a PTSD diagnosis. The findings highlight gaps in the coordination and quality of care, particularly as it relates to VA standards, for veterans receiving PTSD care in the community.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of traumatic stress\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of traumatic stress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.70012\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of traumatic stress","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.70012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管在社区中接受创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)治疗的退伍军人人数有所增加,但很少有工作检查护理的协调和质量,特别是与美国退伍军人事务部(VA)标准相关的工作。为此目的,目前的项目试图记录社区护理特点的退伍军人接受门诊心理治疗的创伤后应激障碍。具体而言,护理的协调性和与VA标准的一致性进行了检查。数据来自美国东南部一家VA医院,收集时间超过2年,包括103名退伍军人的123名PTSD社区护理咨询(年龄47.80岁,SD = 12.03;男性72.4%;黑人50.4%)。由于没有临床服务或到最近的退伍军人管理局设施的平均开车时间超过30分钟,大多数咨询是新的护理转诊(62.6%)。在护理协调方面,27.6%的会诊者没有记录。在有治疗记录的退伍军人中,大多数接受过入院治疗和心理治疗(38.2%),其次是只接受入院治疗和只接受心理治疗。正式的诊断评估没有记录在任何入院记录中,21.2%的心理治疗记录记录了创伤后应激障碍的一线治疗。值得注意的是,大多数摄入记录(56.1%)没有记录任何自杀风险评估,也没有心理治疗记录表明失去了PTSD诊断。研究结果突出了在社区接受创伤后应激障碍治疗的退伍军人的协调和护理质量方面的差距,特别是与VA标准相关的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating coordination and quality of care among veterans receiving posttraumatic stress disorder care in the community.

Despite an increase in the number of veterans receiving posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) care in the community, little work has examined the coordination and quality of care, particularly as it relates to U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) standards. To this end, the current project sought to document community care characteristics among veterans receiving outpatient psychotherapy services for PTSD. Specifically, the coordination of care and congruency with VA standards were examined. Data, which were collected over a 2-year period from a VA hospital in the southeastern United States, included 123 PTSD community care consults across 103 unique veterans (Mage = 47.80 years, SD = 12.03; 72.4% Male; 50.4% Black). The majority of consults were new referrals for care (62.6%) due to the clinical service not being available or the average drive time to the nearest VA facility exceeding 30 min (77.2%). Regarding the coordination of care, records were not available for 27.6% of consults. Among veterans with treatment records, most were seen for an intake and psychotherapy (38.2%), followed by intake only and psychotherapy only. Formal diagnostic assessments were not documented in any intake records, with 21.2% of psychotherapy records documenting the use of a first-line treatment for PTSD. Notably, most intake records (56.1%) failed to document any assessment of suicide risk, and no psychotherapy records indicated the loss of a PTSD diagnosis. The findings highlight gaps in the coordination and quality of care, particularly as it relates to VA standards, for veterans receiving PTSD care in the community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
125
期刊介绍: Journal of Traumatic Stress (JTS) is published for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress , the official publication for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, is an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on biopsychosocial aspects of trauma. Papers focus on theoretical formulations, research, treatment, prevention education/training, and legal and policy concerns. Journal of Traumatic Stress serves as a primary reference for professionals who study and treat people exposed to highly stressful and traumatic events (directly or through their occupational roles), such as war, disaster, accident, violence or abuse (criminal or familial), hostage-taking, or life-threatening illness. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, review papers, commentaries, and, from time to time, special issues devoted to a single topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信