Correlation of Automated Adaptive Thresholding for Inspiratory Mosaic and Expiratory Air Trapping on Chest CT With Pulmonary Function Tests.

Objective: Pulmonary air trapping is critical for diagnosing and prognostication of various lung diseases. Expiratory CT imaging serves as an accessible method to assess air trapping, which correlates with small airway disease outcomes. Air trapping manifests as mosaic attenuation on inspiratory chest CT that is difficult for visual estimation. The primary aim of this study was to develop an automated tool to quantify mosaic attenuation on inspiratory CT and air trapping on paired expiratory CT. Secondary aims included comparing CT-derived parameters with PFT measurements and dyspnea scores.

Methods: This retrospective analysis of noncontrast chest CTs from 2 academic hospitals was conducted between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. Patients with paired inspiratory and expiratory CT chest scans and PFTs performed on the same day were included. A chest radiologist manually annotated lung parenchyma in a reference cohort. Several histogram-based metrics were computed from lung parenchymal CT values, with the maximum peak position showing the strongest correlation with manually determined thresholds. This threshold, derived from the histogram peak, was applied in the adaptive thresholding process to quantify mosaic attenuation and air trapping.

Results: We analyzed 267 patients (65.5% female, median age 68). Most exhibited normal physiological patterns (44.0%). Patients with elevated residual volume (RV) by PFTs (28.1%) had significantly higher inspiratory CT mosaic attenuation (1629.6 vs. 1311.5 mL, P<0.01) and expiratory CT air trapping volumes (1413.7 vs. 886.2 mL, P<0.01). Correlation analyses demonstrated strong relationships between CT-derived mosaic attenuation and air trapping measures and RV. The correlation with PFT parameters was even stronger in subgroup analyses in patients with obstructive PFT patterns. These models had good predictive ability for an abnormal RV (AUC of 0.92, sensitivity of 72.4%, and specificity of 92.0%) and clinical utility based on good correlation with the mMRC dyspnea score (r=0.71; 95% CI: 0.65-0.77).

Conclusions: This automated adaptive thresholding on inspiratory and expiratory chest CT scans showed a high correlation of lung volume and air trapping parameters with PFTs, revealing that measures of lung function have a complex interplay with air trapping.