AD04(一种铝基疫苗佐剂)对早期阿尔茨海默病患者的疗效:AFF006 (NCT01117818)的事后分析,这是一项概念验证的2期随机对照试验。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Benjamin Haaland, Samuel P Dickson, Agustin Fernández Santana, Rudolph E Tanzi, Bruno Dubois, Oliver Peters, Timo Grimmer, Joshua Christensen, Craig Mallinckrodt, Achim Schneeberger, Suzanne B Hendrix
{"title":"AD04(一种铝基疫苗佐剂)对早期阿尔茨海默病患者的疗效:AFF006 (NCT01117818)的事后分析,这是一项概念验证的2期随机对照试验。","authors":"Benjamin Haaland, Samuel P Dickson, Agustin Fernández Santana, Rudolph E Tanzi, Bruno Dubois, Oliver Peters, Timo Grimmer, Joshua Christensen, Craig Mallinckrodt, Achim Schneeberger, Suzanne B Hendrix","doi":"10.1177/13872877251375985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe AFF006 trial (NCT01117818) provided unexpected evidence of benefits of the vaccine adjuvant AD04 (aluminum oxyhydroxide) in patients with early Alzheimer's disease (AD), compared with AD02, a vaccine consisting of a peptide that mimics the N-terminal region of human amyloid-β (Aβ) conjugated with keyhole limpet hemocyanin.ObjectiveThe objective of this post hoc analysis was to assess whether this unexpected benefit of AD04 was an artifact of multiple testing (i.e., type I error inflation) or a robust result.MethodsIn this post hoc assessment, we used permutation testing to estimate type I error inflation due to the evaluation of multiple outcomes in AFF006. Efficacy was assessed using a patient-level global statistical test combining composite endpoints of cognition, function, and global AD. In addition, we examined the observed treatment benefits of AD04 in the context of effects observed in trials of aducanumab, donanemab, and lecanemab, monoclonal anti-Aβ antibodies that received regulatory approval for AD.ResultsThe global statistical test suggested a treatment benefit of AD04 versus ineffective AD02 arms, even after accounting for multiplicity (primary methodology p-value, 0.03; permutation test p-value, 0.02). The observed effect estimates for AD04 compared favorably with approved monoclonal antibodies.ConclusionsPost-hoc analyses are hypothesis generating rather than confirmatory. Adjusting for multiplicity using permutation testing can determine whether post-hoc effects are worth pursuing, or unlikely to be confirmed. These analyses have motivated a follow-up prospective randomized controlled trial, ADVANCE (EudraCT 2022-003532-73), in which optimized AD04 dosing will be compared to placebo in early AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251375985"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of AD04, an aluminum-based vaccine adjuvant, in patients with early Alzheimer's disease: Post hoc analysis of AFF006 (NCT01117818), a proof-of-concept, phase 2 randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Haaland, Samuel P Dickson, Agustin Fernández Santana, Rudolph E Tanzi, Bruno Dubois, Oliver Peters, Timo Grimmer, Joshua Christensen, Craig Mallinckrodt, Achim Schneeberger, Suzanne B Hendrix\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13872877251375985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundThe AFF006 trial (NCT01117818) provided unexpected evidence of benefits of the vaccine adjuvant AD04 (aluminum oxyhydroxide) in patients with early Alzheimer's disease (AD), compared with AD02, a vaccine consisting of a peptide that mimics the N-terminal region of human amyloid-β (Aβ) conjugated with keyhole limpet hemocyanin.ObjectiveThe objective of this post hoc analysis was to assess whether this unexpected benefit of AD04 was an artifact of multiple testing (i.e., type I error inflation) or a robust result.MethodsIn this post hoc assessment, we used permutation testing to estimate type I error inflation due to the evaluation of multiple outcomes in AFF006. Efficacy was assessed using a patient-level global statistical test combining composite endpoints of cognition, function, and global AD. In addition, we examined the observed treatment benefits of AD04 in the context of effects observed in trials of aducanumab, donanemab, and lecanemab, monoclonal anti-Aβ antibodies that received regulatory approval for AD.ResultsThe global statistical test suggested a treatment benefit of AD04 versus ineffective AD02 arms, even after accounting for multiplicity (primary methodology p-value, 0.03; permutation test p-value, 0.02). The observed effect estimates for AD04 compared favorably with approved monoclonal antibodies.ConclusionsPost-hoc analyses are hypothesis generating rather than confirmatory. Adjusting for multiplicity using permutation testing can determine whether post-hoc effects are worth pursuing, or unlikely to be confirmed. These analyses have motivated a follow-up prospective randomized controlled trial, ADVANCE (EudraCT 2022-003532-73), in which optimized AD04 dosing will be compared to placebo in early AD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13872877251375985\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251375985\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251375985","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与AD02相比,AFF006试验(NCT01117818)提供了意想不到的证据,证明疫苗佐剂AD04(氢氧化铝)对早期阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的益处。AD02是一种疫苗,由一种模仿人类淀粉样蛋白-β (a β) n端区域的肽组成,结合了keyhole帽贝血青素。这个事后分析的目的是评估AD04的这种意想不到的好处是多重测试的产物(即,I型错误膨胀)还是一个可靠的结果。方法在这个事后评估中,我们使用排列检验来估计AFF006中由于评估多个结果而导致的I型错误膨胀。疗效评估采用患者水平的整体统计检验,结合认知、功能和整体AD的复合终点。此外,我们在aducanumab、donanemab和lecanemab(获得AD监管批准的单克隆抗a β抗体)试验中观察到的AD04治疗效果的背景下,研究了AD04的治疗效果。结果全球统计检验表明AD04组优于无效AD02组,即使考虑了多重性(主要方法p值,0.03;排列检验p值,0.02)。与已批准的单克隆抗体相比,观察到的AD04效果更好。结论事后分析是产生假设而不是证实性的。使用排列测试调整多样性可以确定事后效应是否值得追求,或者不太可能被证实。这些分析推动了一项后续前瞻性随机对照试验ADVANCE (EudraCT 2022-003532-73),其中优化的AD04剂量将与安慰剂在早期AD中的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of AD04, an aluminum-based vaccine adjuvant, in patients with early Alzheimer's disease: Post hoc analysis of AFF006 (NCT01117818), a proof-of-concept, phase 2 randomized controlled trial.

BackgroundThe AFF006 trial (NCT01117818) provided unexpected evidence of benefits of the vaccine adjuvant AD04 (aluminum oxyhydroxide) in patients with early Alzheimer's disease (AD), compared with AD02, a vaccine consisting of a peptide that mimics the N-terminal region of human amyloid-β (Aβ) conjugated with keyhole limpet hemocyanin.ObjectiveThe objective of this post hoc analysis was to assess whether this unexpected benefit of AD04 was an artifact of multiple testing (i.e., type I error inflation) or a robust result.MethodsIn this post hoc assessment, we used permutation testing to estimate type I error inflation due to the evaluation of multiple outcomes in AFF006. Efficacy was assessed using a patient-level global statistical test combining composite endpoints of cognition, function, and global AD. In addition, we examined the observed treatment benefits of AD04 in the context of effects observed in trials of aducanumab, donanemab, and lecanemab, monoclonal anti-Aβ antibodies that received regulatory approval for AD.ResultsThe global statistical test suggested a treatment benefit of AD04 versus ineffective AD02 arms, even after accounting for multiplicity (primary methodology p-value, 0.03; permutation test p-value, 0.02). The observed effect estimates for AD04 compared favorably with approved monoclonal antibodies.ConclusionsPost-hoc analyses are hypothesis generating rather than confirmatory. Adjusting for multiplicity using permutation testing can determine whether post-hoc effects are worth pursuing, or unlikely to be confirmed. These analyses have motivated a follow-up prospective randomized controlled trial, ADVANCE (EudraCT 2022-003532-73), in which optimized AD04 dosing will be compared to placebo in early AD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信