直接前路外科医生明显夸大了这种方法相对于其他外科医生的好处:爱尔兰,澳大利亚,新西兰和英国在线推广的观点。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Eoghan Pomeroy, Gerard A Sheridan, Mark Curtin, Evelyn P Murphy
{"title":"直接前路外科医生明显夸大了这种方法相对于其他外科医生的好处:爱尔兰,澳大利亚,新西兰和英国在线推广的观点。","authors":"Eoghan Pomeroy, Gerard A Sheridan, Mark Curtin, Evelyn P Murphy","doi":"10.1007/s11845-025-04076-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Growing patient interest in the direct anterior approach (DAA) has led to increased Internet promotion by surgeons.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate Internet promotion of the DAA by surgeons in Australia, New Zealand, Ireland and the UK. Further, we aimed to determine if surgeons offering the DAA discussed the potential benefits of the approach more frequently than other surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Orthopaedic surgeons were identified from the websites of the Australian Orthopaedic Association, New Zealand Orthopaedic Association, UK National Joint Registry, and Irish Institute of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery. Each surgeon website was investigated for claims made regarding the risks and benefits of the DAA, as well as the literature used to support these claims.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 6.4% (n = 177) of websites identified mentioned the DAA: 128 (72.3%) websites were associated with surgeons offering the DAA, while 49 (27.7%) websites were associated with surgeons not offering the DAA. Potential benefits were mentioned in 74% of websites, while 36.7% made reference to risks; 9% cited peer-reviewed literature. When comparing websites of surgeons who offer the DAA with the websites of surgeons who do not, there was a statistically significantly increased rate of mentioning any benefit (p = 0.016), less tissue damage (p = 0.041), less blood loss (p = 0.004), faster recovery (p = 0.004), and fewer dislocations (p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A small number of surgeons in these countries promote the DAA online. Surgeons offering the DAA are more likely to report the potential benefits of the procedure than surgeons not offering the DAA.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct anterior approach surgeons significantly overstate the benefits of this approach relative to other surgeons: a view of online promotion in Ireland, Australia, New Zealand and the UK.\",\"authors\":\"Eoghan Pomeroy, Gerard A Sheridan, Mark Curtin, Evelyn P Murphy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11845-025-04076-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Growing patient interest in the direct anterior approach (DAA) has led to increased Internet promotion by surgeons.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate Internet promotion of the DAA by surgeons in Australia, New Zealand, Ireland and the UK. Further, we aimed to determine if surgeons offering the DAA discussed the potential benefits of the approach more frequently than other surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Orthopaedic surgeons were identified from the websites of the Australian Orthopaedic Association, New Zealand Orthopaedic Association, UK National Joint Registry, and Irish Institute of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery. Each surgeon website was investigated for claims made regarding the risks and benefits of the DAA, as well as the literature used to support these claims.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 6.4% (n = 177) of websites identified mentioned the DAA: 128 (72.3%) websites were associated with surgeons offering the DAA, while 49 (27.7%) websites were associated with surgeons not offering the DAA. Potential benefits were mentioned in 74% of websites, while 36.7% made reference to risks; 9% cited peer-reviewed literature. When comparing websites of surgeons who offer the DAA with the websites of surgeons who do not, there was a statistically significantly increased rate of mentioning any benefit (p = 0.016), less tissue damage (p = 0.041), less blood loss (p = 0.004), faster recovery (p = 0.004), and fewer dislocations (p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A small number of surgeons in these countries promote the DAA online. Surgeons offering the DAA are more likely to report the potential benefits of the procedure than surgeons not offering the DAA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Journal of Medical Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Journal of Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-04076-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-04076-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:越来越多的患者对直接前路入路(DAA)的兴趣导致外科医生增加了互联网推广。目的:本研究的目的是调查澳大利亚、新西兰、爱尔兰和英国的外科医生对DAA的互联网推广情况。此外,我们的目的是确定提供DAA的外科医生是否比其他外科医生更频繁地讨论该入路的潜在益处。方法:从澳大利亚骨科协会、新西兰骨科协会、英国国家联合登记处和爱尔兰创伤与骨科研究所的网站上确定骨科医生。每个外科医生网站都被调查了关于DAA的风险和益处的声明,以及用于支持这些声明的文献。结果:总共有6.4% (n = 177)的网站提到了DAA: 128个(72.3%)网站与提供DAA的外科医生有关,49个(27.7%)网站与不提供DAA的外科医生有关。74%的网站提到了潜在的好处,36.7%的网站提到了风险;9%引用了同行评议的文献。当将提供DAA的外科医生的网站与不提供DAA的外科医生的网站进行比较时,提到任何益处的比率(p = 0.016)、组织损伤(p = 0.041)、出血量(p = 0.004)、恢复速度(p = 0.004)和脱位(p = 0.002)的比例在统计学上显著增加。结论:这些国家的少数外科医生在网上推广DAA。提供DAA的外科医生比不提供DAA的外科医生更有可能报告手术的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Direct anterior approach surgeons significantly overstate the benefits of this approach relative to other surgeons: a view of online promotion in Ireland, Australia, New Zealand and the UK.

Background: Growing patient interest in the direct anterior approach (DAA) has led to increased Internet promotion by surgeons.

Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate Internet promotion of the DAA by surgeons in Australia, New Zealand, Ireland and the UK. Further, we aimed to determine if surgeons offering the DAA discussed the potential benefits of the approach more frequently than other surgeons.

Methods: Orthopaedic surgeons were identified from the websites of the Australian Orthopaedic Association, New Zealand Orthopaedic Association, UK National Joint Registry, and Irish Institute of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery. Each surgeon website was investigated for claims made regarding the risks and benefits of the DAA, as well as the literature used to support these claims.

Results: In total, 6.4% (n = 177) of websites identified mentioned the DAA: 128 (72.3%) websites were associated with surgeons offering the DAA, while 49 (27.7%) websites were associated with surgeons not offering the DAA. Potential benefits were mentioned in 74% of websites, while 36.7% made reference to risks; 9% cited peer-reviewed literature. When comparing websites of surgeons who offer the DAA with the websites of surgeons who do not, there was a statistically significantly increased rate of mentioning any benefit (p = 0.016), less tissue damage (p = 0.041), less blood loss (p = 0.004), faster recovery (p = 0.004), and fewer dislocations (p = 0.002).

Conclusion: A small number of surgeons in these countries promote the DAA online. Surgeons offering the DAA are more likely to report the potential benefits of the procedure than surgeons not offering the DAA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信