冠状动脉血管内成像应用的地理和时间差异以及更广泛采用的障碍:系统回顾和汇总分析。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Samuel Norman, Anoop N Koshy, Anna Wan, Sinjini Biswas, William Wilson, David Eccleston, Jeffrey Lefkovits
{"title":"冠状动脉血管内成像应用的地理和时间差异以及更广泛采用的障碍:系统回顾和汇总分析。","authors":"Samuel Norman, Anoop N Koshy, Anna Wan, Sinjini Biswas, William Wilson, David Eccleston, Jeffrey Lefkovits","doi":"10.1016/j.hlc.2025.04.086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the accumulation of randomised data demonstrating improved outcomes with intravascular imaging (IVI)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), utilisation is uncommon in most countries. This systematic review maps geographical and temporal trends in IVI use using PCI registry and government data.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review adhering to the PRISMA framework was conducted to identify provincial, national, and international data sets reporting real-world IVI rates published between 2014 and 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 publications from 24 countries were included, totalling 9,459,897 patients. Intravascular ultrasound was the preferred imaging modality, with optical coherence tomography accounting for <10% of IVI. Most countries reported low rates of IVI uptake, however, significant increases over time were observed. Rates varied significantly between and within regions and countries. Asia had the highest mean utilisation rate (35.4%; standard deviation, 35.9), followed by the Americas (9.3%; 5.7), Europe (5.7%; 4.9), and Oceania (4.5%; 2.6).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant variability in IVI utilisation was observed across regions and countries. Most countries reported low IVI rates; however, adoption increased over time in most areas. Local variables such as health care system characteristics, physician preferences, and financial considerations appear to inform IVI rates more than clinical factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":13000,"journal":{"name":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geographical and Temporal Variation in Coronary Intravascular Imaging Utilisation and Barriers to Wider Adoption: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Norman, Anoop N Koshy, Anna Wan, Sinjini Biswas, William Wilson, David Eccleston, Jeffrey Lefkovits\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlc.2025.04.086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the accumulation of randomised data demonstrating improved outcomes with intravascular imaging (IVI)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), utilisation is uncommon in most countries. This systematic review maps geographical and temporal trends in IVI use using PCI registry and government data.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review adhering to the PRISMA framework was conducted to identify provincial, national, and international data sets reporting real-world IVI rates published between 2014 and 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 publications from 24 countries were included, totalling 9,459,897 patients. Intravascular ultrasound was the preferred imaging modality, with optical coherence tomography accounting for <10% of IVI. Most countries reported low rates of IVI uptake, however, significant increases over time were observed. Rates varied significantly between and within regions and countries. Asia had the highest mean utilisation rate (35.4%; standard deviation, 35.9), followed by the Americas (9.3%; 5.7), Europe (5.7%; 4.9), and Oceania (4.5%; 2.6).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant variability in IVI utilisation was observed across regions and countries. Most countries reported low IVI rates; however, adoption increased over time in most areas. Local variables such as health care system characteristics, physician preferences, and financial considerations appear to inform IVI rates more than clinical factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart, Lung and Circulation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart, Lung and Circulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2025.04.086\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2025.04.086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管累积的随机数据表明血管内成像(IVI)引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)改善了结果,但在大多数国家,这种应用并不常见。本系统综述利用PCI登记和政府数据绘制了IVI使用的地理和时间趋势图。方法:遵循PRISMA框架进行系统评价,以确定2014年至2024年间发布的报告真实IVI率的省级、国家和国际数据集。结果:共纳入来自24个国家的36篇文献,共计9459897例患者。血管内超声是首选的成像方式,光学相干断层扫描解释了以下结论:不同地区和国家的IVI使用情况存在显著差异。大多数国家报告的体外注射率较低;然而,随着时间的推移,大多数地区的采用率都在增加。地方性变量,如卫生保健系统特征、医生偏好和财务考虑,似乎比临床因素更能影响IVI率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Geographical and Temporal Variation in Coronary Intravascular Imaging Utilisation and Barriers to Wider Adoption: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.

Background: Despite the accumulation of randomised data demonstrating improved outcomes with intravascular imaging (IVI)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), utilisation is uncommon in most countries. This systematic review maps geographical and temporal trends in IVI use using PCI registry and government data.

Method: A systematic review adhering to the PRISMA framework was conducted to identify provincial, national, and international data sets reporting real-world IVI rates published between 2014 and 2024.

Results: A total of 36 publications from 24 countries were included, totalling 9,459,897 patients. Intravascular ultrasound was the preferred imaging modality, with optical coherence tomography accounting for <10% of IVI. Most countries reported low rates of IVI uptake, however, significant increases over time were observed. Rates varied significantly between and within regions and countries. Asia had the highest mean utilisation rate (35.4%; standard deviation, 35.9), followed by the Americas (9.3%; 5.7), Europe (5.7%; 4.9), and Oceania (4.5%; 2.6).

Conclusions: Significant variability in IVI utilisation was observed across regions and countries. Most countries reported low IVI rates; however, adoption increased over time in most areas. Local variables such as health care system characteristics, physician preferences, and financial considerations appear to inform IVI rates more than clinical factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart, Lung and Circulation
Heart, Lung and Circulation CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
912
审稿时长
11.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart, Lung and Circulation publishes articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science, clinical cardiology and cardiac surgery, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. The journal promotes multidisciplinary dialogue between cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, cardio-pulmonary physicians and cardiovascular scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信