定义在接受团体统一方案后退出或对治疗无反应的情绪障碍患者的概况。

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Ó. Peris-Baquero, J. D. Moreno, L. Martínez-García, J. Pérez González, J. Osma
{"title":"定义在接受团体统一方案后退出或对治疗无反应的情绪障碍患者的概况。","authors":"Ó. Peris-Baquero,&nbsp;J. D. Moreno,&nbsp;L. Martínez-García,&nbsp;J. Pérez González,&nbsp;J. Osma","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Dropout, defined as the unilateral discontinuation of treatment before achieving goals or completing a set number of sessions, affects a large number of individuals. Additionally, many individuals do not experience an improvement of symptoms after treatment. This study has explored the profile of individuals who drop out or do not respond favourably to the Unified Protocol (UP) applied in group format. This is a secondary analysis of a RCT that involved 277 participants (78.3% women) diagnosed with emotional disorders who received 12-weekly group sessions at specialized mental health units. Socio-demographic variables, personality, anxiety and depression symptoms and emotional regulation were analysed at baseline, post-treatment and 12-month follow-up. Fewer emotional regulation difficulties at baseline predict higher dropout rates at post-treatment, with 28.9% of participants (<i>n</i> = 80) receiving fewer than six sessions. Additionally, 46.0% of participants showed no change in the severity of depressive symptoms, and 56.8% showed no change in anxiety symptoms post-treatment. At the 12-month follow-up, 31.1% of participants maintained the same severity level for depressive symptoms and 49.5% for anxiety symptoms. Higher baseline anxiety and emotional dysregulation and lower extraversion predicted higher depressive symptoms at post-treatment, and higher baseline anxiety predicted higher depressive symptomatology at the 12-month follow-up. Higher baseline depression and emotional dysregulation predicted higher post-treatment anxiety, and depression also predicted higher anxiety at the 12-month follow-up. Additionally, high baseline depression predicted higher neuroticism and emotional dysregulation and lower extraversion after treatment and at the 12-month follow-up (for neuroticism and extraversion). Finally, high baseline emotional dysregulation predicted higher neuroticism post-treatment, whereas high baseline maladjustment predicted lower emotional dysregulation at post-treatment. Emotional dysregulation, neuroticism, extraversion and especially baseline depression and anxiety symptoms are key factors associated with dropouts and treatment response when applying the UP in group format. Considering these variables may improve attendance and treatment outcomes.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining the Profile of People With Emotional Disorders That Drop Out or Do Not Respond to Treatment After Receiving the Unified Protocol in Group Format\",\"authors\":\"Ó. Peris-Baquero,&nbsp;J. D. Moreno,&nbsp;L. Martínez-García,&nbsp;J. Pérez González,&nbsp;J. Osma\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpp.70154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Dropout, defined as the unilateral discontinuation of treatment before achieving goals or completing a set number of sessions, affects a large number of individuals. Additionally, many individuals do not experience an improvement of symptoms after treatment. This study has explored the profile of individuals who drop out or do not respond favourably to the Unified Protocol (UP) applied in group format. This is a secondary analysis of a RCT that involved 277 participants (78.3% women) diagnosed with emotional disorders who received 12-weekly group sessions at specialized mental health units. Socio-demographic variables, personality, anxiety and depression symptoms and emotional regulation were analysed at baseline, post-treatment and 12-month follow-up. Fewer emotional regulation difficulties at baseline predict higher dropout rates at post-treatment, with 28.9% of participants (<i>n</i> = 80) receiving fewer than six sessions. Additionally, 46.0% of participants showed no change in the severity of depressive symptoms, and 56.8% showed no change in anxiety symptoms post-treatment. At the 12-month follow-up, 31.1% of participants maintained the same severity level for depressive symptoms and 49.5% for anxiety symptoms. Higher baseline anxiety and emotional dysregulation and lower extraversion predicted higher depressive symptoms at post-treatment, and higher baseline anxiety predicted higher depressive symptomatology at the 12-month follow-up. Higher baseline depression and emotional dysregulation predicted higher post-treatment anxiety, and depression also predicted higher anxiety at the 12-month follow-up. Additionally, high baseline depression predicted higher neuroticism and emotional dysregulation and lower extraversion after treatment and at the 12-month follow-up (for neuroticism and extraversion). Finally, high baseline emotional dysregulation predicted higher neuroticism post-treatment, whereas high baseline maladjustment predicted lower emotional dysregulation at post-treatment. Emotional dysregulation, neuroticism, extraversion and especially baseline depression and anxiety symptoms are key factors associated with dropouts and treatment response when applying the UP in group format. Considering these variables may improve attendance and treatment outcomes.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70154\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

辍学,被定义为在达到目标或完成一定次数的治疗之前单方面停止治疗,影响了大量个体。此外,许多人在治疗后症状没有改善。本研究探讨了以小组形式应用统一协议(UP)的辍学或不积极响应的个人概况。这是对一项随机对照试验的二次分析,该试验涉及277名被诊断患有情绪障碍的参与者(78.3%为女性),他们在专门的精神卫生单位接受了12周的小组治疗。在基线、治疗后和12个月随访时分析社会人口统计学变量、个性、焦虑和抑郁症状以及情绪调节。基线时较少的情绪调节困难预示着治疗后较高的辍学率,28.9%的参与者(n = 80)接受少于6次治疗。此外,46.0%的参与者在治疗后抑郁症状的严重程度没有变化,56.8%的参与者在治疗后焦虑症状没有变化。在12个月的随访中,31.1%的参与者的抑郁症状和49.5%的焦虑症状保持相同的严重程度。较高的基线焦虑和情绪失调以及较低的外向性预示着治疗后较高的抑郁症状,而较高的基线焦虑预示着12个月随访时较高的抑郁症状。更高的基线抑郁和情绪失调预示着更高的治疗后焦虑,在12个月的随访中,抑郁也预示着更高的焦虑。此外,在治疗后和12个月的随访中,高基线抑郁预示着更高的神经质和情绪失调以及更低的外向性(神经质和外向性)。最后,高基线情绪失调预示着治疗后更高的神经质,而高基线情绪失调预示着治疗后更低的情绪失调。当以小组形式应用UP时,情绪失调、神经质、外向性,特别是基线抑郁和焦虑症状是与退学和治疗反应相关的关键因素。考虑这些变量可能会改善出勤率和治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Defining the Profile of People With Emotional Disorders That Drop Out or Do Not Respond to Treatment After Receiving the Unified Protocol in Group Format

Dropout, defined as the unilateral discontinuation of treatment before achieving goals or completing a set number of sessions, affects a large number of individuals. Additionally, many individuals do not experience an improvement of symptoms after treatment. This study has explored the profile of individuals who drop out or do not respond favourably to the Unified Protocol (UP) applied in group format. This is a secondary analysis of a RCT that involved 277 participants (78.3% women) diagnosed with emotional disorders who received 12-weekly group sessions at specialized mental health units. Socio-demographic variables, personality, anxiety and depression symptoms and emotional regulation were analysed at baseline, post-treatment and 12-month follow-up. Fewer emotional regulation difficulties at baseline predict higher dropout rates at post-treatment, with 28.9% of participants (n = 80) receiving fewer than six sessions. Additionally, 46.0% of participants showed no change in the severity of depressive symptoms, and 56.8% showed no change in anxiety symptoms post-treatment. At the 12-month follow-up, 31.1% of participants maintained the same severity level for depressive symptoms and 49.5% for anxiety symptoms. Higher baseline anxiety and emotional dysregulation and lower extraversion predicted higher depressive symptoms at post-treatment, and higher baseline anxiety predicted higher depressive symptomatology at the 12-month follow-up. Higher baseline depression and emotional dysregulation predicted higher post-treatment anxiety, and depression also predicted higher anxiety at the 12-month follow-up. Additionally, high baseline depression predicted higher neuroticism and emotional dysregulation and lower extraversion after treatment and at the 12-month follow-up (for neuroticism and extraversion). Finally, high baseline emotional dysregulation predicted higher neuroticism post-treatment, whereas high baseline maladjustment predicted lower emotional dysregulation at post-treatment. Emotional dysregulation, neuroticism, extraversion and especially baseline depression and anxiety symptoms are key factors associated with dropouts and treatment response when applying the UP in group format. Considering these variables may improve attendance and treatment outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信