Hannes Gahnfelt, Sandra Weineland, Per F G Carlsson, Christina Blomdahl
{"title":"创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍8天强化治疗方案与常规治疗:临床试验。","authors":"Hannes Gahnfelt, Sandra Weineland, Per F G Carlsson, Christina Blomdahl","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2553422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Intensive treatment programmes (ITP) have emerged as a treatment option for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex PTSD (CPTSD) during the last decade. Results are promising, but further studies with control group are needed.<b>Objective:</b> To compare the effect of an 8-day ITP with traditionally spaced treatments for PTSD.<b>Method:</b> Participants with PTSD or CPTSD (<i>n</i> = 101) in a Swedish psychiatric outpatient clinic received either 8-day ITP, including prolonged exposure, eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing therapy, physical activity and psychoeducation, or traditionally spaced treatment (TAU). Participants were allocated by shared decision-making.<b>Results:</b> A significant reduction in PTSD symptoms was observed at posttreatment, with large effect sizes in both conditions. Symptom reduction was maintained at follow-up. There was no significant difference between treatment groups in degree of symptom reduction at posttreatment and follow-up. In the ITP, 73.3% did not meet criteria for PTSD at follow-up, and 74.4% in TAU. There was a significant difference in dropout rates between treatment groups: 4.3% in ITP and 24.1% in TAU.<b>Conclusions:</b> Results indicate that ITP can be considered an effective treatment in healthcare settings where multiple treatment options are available. Randomised control studies to isolate treatment effects and finding underlying factors explaining the difference in dropout rates are important directions for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2553422"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"8-day intensive treatment programme for PTSD and complex PTSD vs treatment as usual: a clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hannes Gahnfelt, Sandra Weineland, Per F G Carlsson, Christina Blomdahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20008066.2025.2553422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Intensive treatment programmes (ITP) have emerged as a treatment option for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex PTSD (CPTSD) during the last decade. Results are promising, but further studies with control group are needed.<b>Objective:</b> To compare the effect of an 8-day ITP with traditionally spaced treatments for PTSD.<b>Method:</b> Participants with PTSD or CPTSD (<i>n</i> = 101) in a Swedish psychiatric outpatient clinic received either 8-day ITP, including prolonged exposure, eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing therapy, physical activity and psychoeducation, or traditionally spaced treatment (TAU). Participants were allocated by shared decision-making.<b>Results:</b> A significant reduction in PTSD symptoms was observed at posttreatment, with large effect sizes in both conditions. Symptom reduction was maintained at follow-up. There was no significant difference between treatment groups in degree of symptom reduction at posttreatment and follow-up. In the ITP, 73.3% did not meet criteria for PTSD at follow-up, and 74.4% in TAU. There was a significant difference in dropout rates between treatment groups: 4.3% in ITP and 24.1% in TAU.<b>Conclusions:</b> Results indicate that ITP can be considered an effective treatment in healthcare settings where multiple treatment options are available. Randomised control studies to isolate treatment effects and finding underlying factors explaining the difference in dropout rates are important directions for future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Psychotraumatology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"2553422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444955/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Psychotraumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2553422\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2553422","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
8-day intensive treatment programme for PTSD and complex PTSD vs treatment as usual: a clinical trial.
Background: Intensive treatment programmes (ITP) have emerged as a treatment option for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex PTSD (CPTSD) during the last decade. Results are promising, but further studies with control group are needed.Objective: To compare the effect of an 8-day ITP with traditionally spaced treatments for PTSD.Method: Participants with PTSD or CPTSD (n = 101) in a Swedish psychiatric outpatient clinic received either 8-day ITP, including prolonged exposure, eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing therapy, physical activity and psychoeducation, or traditionally spaced treatment (TAU). Participants were allocated by shared decision-making.Results: A significant reduction in PTSD symptoms was observed at posttreatment, with large effect sizes in both conditions. Symptom reduction was maintained at follow-up. There was no significant difference between treatment groups in degree of symptom reduction at posttreatment and follow-up. In the ITP, 73.3% did not meet criteria for PTSD at follow-up, and 74.4% in TAU. There was a significant difference in dropout rates between treatment groups: 4.3% in ITP and 24.1% in TAU.Conclusions: Results indicate that ITP can be considered an effective treatment in healthcare settings where multiple treatment options are available. Randomised control studies to isolate treatment effects and finding underlying factors explaining the difference in dropout rates are important directions for future research.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.