Kristin Clemens, Benoit Rive, Kruti Joshi, Pushpike Thilakarathne, Noam Kirson, Urvi Desai, Jason Doran, Diab Eid, Alice Qu, Yordan Godinov
{"title":"ESCAPE-TRD研究亚群中患者报告的抑郁症严重程度的评估:艾氯胺酮鼻喷雾剂与奎硫平缓释治疗难治性抑郁症","authors":"Kristin Clemens, Benoit Rive, Kruti Joshi, Pushpike Thilakarathne, Noam Kirson, Urvi Desai, Jason Doran, Diab Eid, Alice Qu, Yordan Godinov","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2555483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>ESCAPE-TRD, a randomized phase 3b trial, compares the efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray (NS) and extended-release (XR) quetiapine, both in combination with ongoing oral antidepressant (OAD) treatment, among individuals with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Although prior analyses used the clinician-rated MADRS, the comparative efficacy of esketamine NS vs. quetiapine XR using a patient-reported instrument to assess TRD severity among a subgroup treated according to US label is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ESCAPE-TRD data were evaluated using the patient-rated Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) instrument for individuals receiving treatment consistent with US prescribing information (NCT04338321). The main outcome was remission at weeks 8 and 32. Additional outcomes included response, time to first remission, time to first response, time to confirmed remission, time to confirmed response, and change in PHQ-9 score from baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significantly higher proportion of individuals in the esketamine NS group than in the quetiapine XR group achieved remission and response at week 8 (remission: 19.3% vs. 12.2%; RD [95% CI]: 7.1% [1.5%, 12.8%]; <i>p</i> = 0.013; response: 49.4% vs. 32.8%, RD [95% CI]:16.6% [9.0%, 24.1%]; <i>p</i> < 0.001). At 32 weeks, a significantly higher proportion of individuals in the esketamine NS group achieved remission and response compared to the quetiapine XR group (remission: 34.8% vs. 18.1%, RD [95% CI]: 16.7% [9.9%, 23.4%]; <i>p</i> < 0.001; response: 58.9% vs. 40.3%, RD [95% CI]:18.5% [10.9%, 26.2%]; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using patient-reported PHQ-9 scoring to evaluate ESCAPE-TRD results, esketamine NS produced superior short- and long-term efficacy vs. quetiapine XR among individuals with TRD treated according to US label.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of patient-reported depression severity in subpopulation of ESCAPE-TRD study: esketamine nasal spray versus quetiapine extended release for treatment-resistant depression.\",\"authors\":\"Kristin Clemens, Benoit Rive, Kruti Joshi, Pushpike Thilakarathne, Noam Kirson, Urvi Desai, Jason Doran, Diab Eid, Alice Qu, Yordan Godinov\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03007995.2025.2555483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>ESCAPE-TRD, a randomized phase 3b trial, compares the efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray (NS) and extended-release (XR) quetiapine, both in combination with ongoing oral antidepressant (OAD) treatment, among individuals with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Although prior analyses used the clinician-rated MADRS, the comparative efficacy of esketamine NS vs. quetiapine XR using a patient-reported instrument to assess TRD severity among a subgroup treated according to US label is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ESCAPE-TRD data were evaluated using the patient-rated Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) instrument for individuals receiving treatment consistent with US prescribing information (NCT04338321). The main outcome was remission at weeks 8 and 32. Additional outcomes included response, time to first remission, time to first response, time to confirmed remission, time to confirmed response, and change in PHQ-9 score from baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significantly higher proportion of individuals in the esketamine NS group than in the quetiapine XR group achieved remission and response at week 8 (remission: 19.3% vs. 12.2%; RD [95% CI]: 7.1% [1.5%, 12.8%]; <i>p</i> = 0.013; response: 49.4% vs. 32.8%, RD [95% CI]:16.6% [9.0%, 24.1%]; <i>p</i> < 0.001). At 32 weeks, a significantly higher proportion of individuals in the esketamine NS group achieved remission and response compared to the quetiapine XR group (remission: 34.8% vs. 18.1%, RD [95% CI]: 16.7% [9.9%, 23.4%]; <i>p</i> < 0.001; response: 58.9% vs. 40.3%, RD [95% CI]:18.5% [10.9%, 26.2%]; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using patient-reported PHQ-9 scoring to evaluate ESCAPE-TRD results, esketamine NS produced superior short- and long-term efficacy vs. quetiapine XR among individuals with TRD treated according to US label.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Research and Opinion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Research and Opinion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2555483\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2555483","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
ESCAPE-TRD是一项随机3b期试验,比较艾氯胺酮鼻腔喷雾剂(NS)和缓释奎硫平(XR)联合持续口服抗抑郁药(OAD)治疗在难治性抑郁症(TRD)患者中的疗效和安全性。虽然先前的分析使用了临床评定的MADRS,但在根据美国标签治疗的亚组中,使用患者报告的仪器来评估TRD严重程度的艾氯胺酮NS与奎硫平XR的比较疗效尚不清楚。方法:ESCAPE-TRD数据采用患者评分的患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)对接受符合美国处方信息(NCT04338321)治疗的个体进行评估。主要结果是在第8周和第32周缓解。其他结果包括反应、首次缓解时间、首次缓解时间、确诊缓解时间、确诊缓解时间和PHQ-9评分自基线的变化。结果:艾氯胺酮NS组在第8周达到缓解和缓解的个体比例显著高于喹硫平XR组(缓解:19.3% vs. 12.2%, RD [95% CI]: 7.1% [1.5%, 12.8%], p = 0.013,缓解:49.4% vs. 32.8%, RD [95% CI]:16.6% [9.0%, 24.1%];结论:使用患者报告的PHQ-9评分来评估ESCAPE-TRD结果,在根据美国标签治疗的TRD患者中,艾氯胺酮NS比喹硫平XR具有更好的短期和长期疗效。
Assessment of patient-reported depression severity in subpopulation of ESCAPE-TRD study: esketamine nasal spray versus quetiapine extended release for treatment-resistant depression.
Objective: ESCAPE-TRD, a randomized phase 3b trial, compares the efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray (NS) and extended-release (XR) quetiapine, both in combination with ongoing oral antidepressant (OAD) treatment, among individuals with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Although prior analyses used the clinician-rated MADRS, the comparative efficacy of esketamine NS vs. quetiapine XR using a patient-reported instrument to assess TRD severity among a subgroup treated according to US label is unknown.
Methods: ESCAPE-TRD data were evaluated using the patient-rated Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) instrument for individuals receiving treatment consistent with US prescribing information (NCT04338321). The main outcome was remission at weeks 8 and 32. Additional outcomes included response, time to first remission, time to first response, time to confirmed remission, time to confirmed response, and change in PHQ-9 score from baseline.
Results: A significantly higher proportion of individuals in the esketamine NS group than in the quetiapine XR group achieved remission and response at week 8 (remission: 19.3% vs. 12.2%; RD [95% CI]: 7.1% [1.5%, 12.8%]; p = 0.013; response: 49.4% vs. 32.8%, RD [95% CI]:16.6% [9.0%, 24.1%]; p < 0.001). At 32 weeks, a significantly higher proportion of individuals in the esketamine NS group achieved remission and response compared to the quetiapine XR group (remission: 34.8% vs. 18.1%, RD [95% CI]: 16.7% [9.9%, 23.4%]; p < 0.001; response: 58.9% vs. 40.3%, RD [95% CI]:18.5% [10.9%, 26.2%]; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Using patient-reported PHQ-9 scoring to evaluate ESCAPE-TRD results, esketamine NS produced superior short- and long-term efficacy vs. quetiapine XR among individuals with TRD treated according to US label.
期刊介绍:
Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance