基于Rasch模型的慢性阻塞性肺病负担量表评估的心理测量学评价。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Maarten Voorhaar, Antoine Regnault, Onno C P van Schayck, Jean Muris, Annerika H M Slok
{"title":"基于Rasch模型的慢性阻塞性肺病负担量表评估的心理测量学评价。","authors":"Maarten Voorhaar, Antoine Regnault, Onno C P van Schayck, Jean Muris, Annerika H M Slok","doi":"10.1080/15412555.2025.2557232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To facilitate shared decision-making in Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the Assessment of the Burden of COPD (ABC) tool was developed. An integral part of the ABC tool is the ABC scale, a questionnaire to determine COPD burden. The psychometric evidence of the ABC scale is limited. If the data would fit the Rasch model, more accurate scoring would be possible. This would improve the use of the ABC tool. Therefore, the aim of this study is to validate the ABC scale using the Rasch model. We conducted a secondary analysis based on data collected in a pragmatic RCT using Rasch model theory. The ordering of thresholds, reliability and targeting were analysed, and we tested unidimensionality, local independence of items (LD), fit of the data with the model and measurement invariance between groups (DIF). We analysed 551 samples from 176 patients. The analyses confirmed that the ABC scale is a reliable instrument. However, initial analysis showed a poor fit of the data to the Rasch model. After recoding the response options and analysing the fit of the data for the subdomains of the ABC scale, we found ordered thresholds and a good overall model fit. This analysis indicates that the ABC scale assessed three distinct sub-domains: symptoms, physical functioning, and emotional health. We conclude that the ABC scale is a valid instrument to assess COPD burden. While the scale is considered suitable for use in clinical practice and research, we suggest rewording the response options to ensure uniform understanding by respondents.</p><p><p>The used data were derived from a previously conducted trial (NTR3788).</p>","PeriodicalId":10704,"journal":{"name":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"22 1","pages":"2557232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Evaluation of the Assessment of the Burden of COPD Scale According to the Rasch Model.\",\"authors\":\"Maarten Voorhaar, Antoine Regnault, Onno C P van Schayck, Jean Muris, Annerika H M Slok\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15412555.2025.2557232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To facilitate shared decision-making in Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the Assessment of the Burden of COPD (ABC) tool was developed. An integral part of the ABC tool is the ABC scale, a questionnaire to determine COPD burden. The psychometric evidence of the ABC scale is limited. If the data would fit the Rasch model, more accurate scoring would be possible. This would improve the use of the ABC tool. Therefore, the aim of this study is to validate the ABC scale using the Rasch model. We conducted a secondary analysis based on data collected in a pragmatic RCT using Rasch model theory. The ordering of thresholds, reliability and targeting were analysed, and we tested unidimensionality, local independence of items (LD), fit of the data with the model and measurement invariance between groups (DIF). We analysed 551 samples from 176 patients. The analyses confirmed that the ABC scale is a reliable instrument. However, initial analysis showed a poor fit of the data to the Rasch model. After recoding the response options and analysing the fit of the data for the subdomains of the ABC scale, we found ordered thresholds and a good overall model fit. This analysis indicates that the ABC scale assessed three distinct sub-domains: symptoms, physical functioning, and emotional health. We conclude that the ABC scale is a valid instrument to assess COPD burden. While the scale is considered suitable for use in clinical practice and research, we suggest rewording the response options to ensure uniform understanding by respondents.</p><p><p>The used data were derived from a previously conducted trial (NTR3788).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"2557232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2025.2557232\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2025.2557232","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了促进慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的共同决策,开发了COPD负担评估(ABC)工具。ABC量表是ABC工具的一个组成部分,这是一份确定COPD负担的问卷。ABC量表的心理测量证据是有限的。如果数据符合Rasch模型,更准确的评分将成为可能。这将改进ABC工具的使用。因此,本研究的目的是使用Rasch模型对ABC量表进行验证。我们利用Rasch模型理论对一项语用随机对照试验收集的数据进行了二次分析。分析了阈值排序、信度和目标性,并检验了单维性、项目局部独立性(LD)、数据与模型的拟合和组间测量不变性(DIF)。我们分析了176名患者的551份样本。分析证实ABC量表是一个可靠的工具。然而,最初的分析显示数据与Rasch模型的拟合很差。在对回答选项进行重新编码并分析ABC量表子域数据的拟合后,我们发现了有序的阈值和良好的整体模型拟合。该分析表明,ABC量表评估了三个不同的子领域:症状、身体功能和情绪健康。我们得出结论,ABC量表是评估COPD负担的有效工具。虽然该量表被认为适合用于临床实践和研究,但我们建议重新措辞回答选项,以确保受访者的统一理解。使用的数据来自先前进行的一项试验(NTR3788)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric Evaluation of the Assessment of the Burden of COPD Scale According to the Rasch Model.

To facilitate shared decision-making in Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the Assessment of the Burden of COPD (ABC) tool was developed. An integral part of the ABC tool is the ABC scale, a questionnaire to determine COPD burden. The psychometric evidence of the ABC scale is limited. If the data would fit the Rasch model, more accurate scoring would be possible. This would improve the use of the ABC tool. Therefore, the aim of this study is to validate the ABC scale using the Rasch model. We conducted a secondary analysis based on data collected in a pragmatic RCT using Rasch model theory. The ordering of thresholds, reliability and targeting were analysed, and we tested unidimensionality, local independence of items (LD), fit of the data with the model and measurement invariance between groups (DIF). We analysed 551 samples from 176 patients. The analyses confirmed that the ABC scale is a reliable instrument. However, initial analysis showed a poor fit of the data to the Rasch model. After recoding the response options and analysing the fit of the data for the subdomains of the ABC scale, we found ordered thresholds and a good overall model fit. This analysis indicates that the ABC scale assessed three distinct sub-domains: symptoms, physical functioning, and emotional health. We conclude that the ABC scale is a valid instrument to assess COPD burden. While the scale is considered suitable for use in clinical practice and research, we suggest rewording the response options to ensure uniform understanding by respondents.

The used data were derived from a previously conducted trial (NTR3788).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: From pathophysiology and cell biology to pharmacology and psychosocial impact, COPD: Journal Of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease publishes a wide range of original research, reviews, case studies, and conference proceedings to promote advances in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, and control of lung and airway disease and inflammation - providing a unique forum for the discussion, design, and evaluation of more efficient and effective strategies in patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信