Natalia A Koubassova, Debabrata Dutta, Weikang Ma, Andrey K Tsaturyan, Thomas Irving, Raúl Padrón, Roger Craig
{"title":"注释脊椎动物横纹肌的x射线衍射图。","authors":"Natalia A Koubassova, Debabrata Dutta, Weikang Ma, Andrey K Tsaturyan, Thomas Irving, Raúl Padrón, Roger Craig","doi":"10.1016/j.bpj.2025.09.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Low-angle x-ray diffraction is a powerful technique for analyzing the molecular structure of the myofilaments of striated muscle in situ. It has contributed greatly to our understanding of the relaxed, 430-Å repeating organization of myosin heads in thick filaments in skeletal and cardiac muscle. Using x-ray diffraction, changes in filament structure can be detected on the angstrom length scale and millisecond timescale, leading to models that are the foundation of our understanding of the structural basis of contraction. As with all x-ray fiber diffraction studies, interpretation requires modeling, which has previously been based on low-resolution knowledge of thick filament structure and is complicated by the contributions of multiple filament components to most x-ray reflections. Here, we use an atomic model of the human cardiac thick filament C-zone, derived from cryo-EM in the presence of the myosin inhibitor, mavacamten, to compute objectively the contributions of myosin heads, tails, titin, and cMyBP-C to the diffraction pattern, by including/excluding these components in the calculations. Our results support some previous interpretations but contradict others. We confirm that the myosin heads are responsible for most of the intensity on the myosin layer lines, including the M3 meridional. Contrary to expectation, we find that myosin tails contribute little to the pattern, including the M6 meridional; this reflection arises mainly from heads and other components. The M11 layer line (39-Å spacing) arises mostly from the curved and kinked structure of titin, which allows 11 ∼42-Å-long domains to fit into the 430-Å repeat. The M11 spacing can be used as a measure of strain in the myosin filament backbone as there is negligible head contribution. The computed layer lines account well for the experimentally determined pattern. These insights should aid future understanding of the x-ray pattern of intact muscle in different conditions such as contraction and drug treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":8922,"journal":{"name":"Biophysical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Annotating the x-ray diffraction pattern of vertebrate striated muscle.\",\"authors\":\"Natalia A Koubassova, Debabrata Dutta, Weikang Ma, Andrey K Tsaturyan, Thomas Irving, Raúl Padrón, Roger Craig\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bpj.2025.09.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Low-angle x-ray diffraction is a powerful technique for analyzing the molecular structure of the myofilaments of striated muscle in situ. It has contributed greatly to our understanding of the relaxed, 430-Å repeating organization of myosin heads in thick filaments in skeletal and cardiac muscle. Using x-ray diffraction, changes in filament structure can be detected on the angstrom length scale and millisecond timescale, leading to models that are the foundation of our understanding of the structural basis of contraction. As with all x-ray fiber diffraction studies, interpretation requires modeling, which has previously been based on low-resolution knowledge of thick filament structure and is complicated by the contributions of multiple filament components to most x-ray reflections. Here, we use an atomic model of the human cardiac thick filament C-zone, derived from cryo-EM in the presence of the myosin inhibitor, mavacamten, to compute objectively the contributions of myosin heads, tails, titin, and cMyBP-C to the diffraction pattern, by including/excluding these components in the calculations. Our results support some previous interpretations but contradict others. We confirm that the myosin heads are responsible for most of the intensity on the myosin layer lines, including the M3 meridional. Contrary to expectation, we find that myosin tails contribute little to the pattern, including the M6 meridional; this reflection arises mainly from heads and other components. The M11 layer line (39-Å spacing) arises mostly from the curved and kinked structure of titin, which allows 11 ∼42-Å-long domains to fit into the 430-Å repeat. The M11 spacing can be used as a measure of strain in the myosin filament backbone as there is negligible head contribution. The computed layer lines account well for the experimentally determined pattern. These insights should aid future understanding of the x-ray pattern of intact muscle in different conditions such as contraction and drug treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biophysical journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biophysical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2025.09.019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysical journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2025.09.019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Annotating the x-ray diffraction pattern of vertebrate striated muscle.
Low-angle x-ray diffraction is a powerful technique for analyzing the molecular structure of the myofilaments of striated muscle in situ. It has contributed greatly to our understanding of the relaxed, 430-Å repeating organization of myosin heads in thick filaments in skeletal and cardiac muscle. Using x-ray diffraction, changes in filament structure can be detected on the angstrom length scale and millisecond timescale, leading to models that are the foundation of our understanding of the structural basis of contraction. As with all x-ray fiber diffraction studies, interpretation requires modeling, which has previously been based on low-resolution knowledge of thick filament structure and is complicated by the contributions of multiple filament components to most x-ray reflections. Here, we use an atomic model of the human cardiac thick filament C-zone, derived from cryo-EM in the presence of the myosin inhibitor, mavacamten, to compute objectively the contributions of myosin heads, tails, titin, and cMyBP-C to the diffraction pattern, by including/excluding these components in the calculations. Our results support some previous interpretations but contradict others. We confirm that the myosin heads are responsible for most of the intensity on the myosin layer lines, including the M3 meridional. Contrary to expectation, we find that myosin tails contribute little to the pattern, including the M6 meridional; this reflection arises mainly from heads and other components. The M11 layer line (39-Å spacing) arises mostly from the curved and kinked structure of titin, which allows 11 ∼42-Å-long domains to fit into the 430-Å repeat. The M11 spacing can be used as a measure of strain in the myosin filament backbone as there is negligible head contribution. The computed layer lines account well for the experimentally determined pattern. These insights should aid future understanding of the x-ray pattern of intact muscle in different conditions such as contraction and drug treatment.
期刊介绍:
BJ publishes original articles, letters, and perspectives on important problems in modern biophysics. The papers should be written so as to be of interest to a broad community of biophysicists. BJ welcomes experimental studies that employ quantitative physical approaches for the study of biological systems, including or spanning scales from molecule to whole organism. Experimental studies of a purely descriptive or phenomenological nature, with no theoretical or mechanistic underpinning, are not appropriate for publication in BJ. Theoretical studies should offer new insights into the understanding ofexperimental results or suggest new experimentally testable hypotheses. Articles reporting significant methodological or technological advances, which have potential to open new areas of biophysical investigation, are also suitable for publication in BJ. Papers describing improvements in accuracy or speed of existing methods or extra detail within methods described previously are not suitable for BJ.