单细胞转录组分析表明,肿瘤微环境细胞是脑和颅外黑色素瘤转移的主要鉴别因子。

IF 4.9 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Konrad Grützmann, Michael Seifert
{"title":"单细胞转录组分析表明,肿瘤微环境细胞是脑和颅外黑色素瘤转移的主要鉴别因子。","authors":"Konrad Grützmann, Michael Seifert","doi":"10.1186/s13062-025-00691-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite therapeutic advances, metastatic melanoma, and particularly brain metastasis (MBM), remains a lethal burden for patients. Existing single-cell studies offer a more detailed view of melanoma and its microenvironment, which is crucial to improve diagnosis and treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We here present a computational reanalysis of single-nucleus data comparing 15 MBM and 10 extracranial melanoma metastases (ECM), considering recent best practice recommendations. We used cell type-specific pseudobulking and omit imputation during patient integration to gain complementary insights. Interestingly, our analysis revealed high homogeneity in tumor cell expression profiles within and between MBM and ECM. However, MBM displayed even higher homogeneity but a more flexible energy metabolism, suggesting a specific metastatic adaptation to the putatively more restricted brain microenvironment. While tumor cells were homogeneous, the metastasis microenvironment, especially lymphocytes and related immune-tumor interaction pathways, exhibited greater divergence between MBM and ECM. Overall, this suggests that major differences between MBM and ECM are potentially driven by variations in their microenvironment. Finally, a comparison of single-cell data to previous bulk studies, including their deconvoluted putative cell types, showed significant differences, potentially causing divergent conclusions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study contributed to refine the understanding of differences between MBM and ECM, suggesting these are potentially more influenced by their local microenvironments. Future research and therapies could possibly focus on the metabolic flexibility of melanoma brain metastases and patient-specific immune pathway alterations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9164,"journal":{"name":"Biology Direct","volume":"20 1","pages":"97"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-cell transcriptome analysis suggests cells of the tumor microenvironment as a major discriminator between brain and extracranial melanoma metastases.\",\"authors\":\"Konrad Grützmann, Michael Seifert\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13062-025-00691-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite therapeutic advances, metastatic melanoma, and particularly brain metastasis (MBM), remains a lethal burden for patients. Existing single-cell studies offer a more detailed view of melanoma and its microenvironment, which is crucial to improve diagnosis and treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We here present a computational reanalysis of single-nucleus data comparing 15 MBM and 10 extracranial melanoma metastases (ECM), considering recent best practice recommendations. We used cell type-specific pseudobulking and omit imputation during patient integration to gain complementary insights. Interestingly, our analysis revealed high homogeneity in tumor cell expression profiles within and between MBM and ECM. However, MBM displayed even higher homogeneity but a more flexible energy metabolism, suggesting a specific metastatic adaptation to the putatively more restricted brain microenvironment. While tumor cells were homogeneous, the metastasis microenvironment, especially lymphocytes and related immune-tumor interaction pathways, exhibited greater divergence between MBM and ECM. Overall, this suggests that major differences between MBM and ECM are potentially driven by variations in their microenvironment. Finally, a comparison of single-cell data to previous bulk studies, including their deconvoluted putative cell types, showed significant differences, potentially causing divergent conclusions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study contributed to refine the understanding of differences between MBM and ECM, suggesting these are potentially more influenced by their local microenvironments. Future research and therapies could possibly focus on the metabolic flexibility of melanoma brain metastases and patient-specific immune pathway alterations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology Direct\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439397/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology Direct\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-025-00691-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology Direct","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-025-00691-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管治疗取得了进展,但转移性黑色素瘤,特别是脑转移瘤(MBM)仍然是患者的致命负担。现有的单细胞研究为黑色素瘤及其微环境提供了更详细的视角,这对提高诊断和治疗至关重要。结果:考虑到最近的最佳实践建议,我们在这里提出了比较15例MBM和10例颅外黑色素瘤转移(ECM)的单核数据的计算再分析。我们使用了细胞类型特异性的假体积,并在患者整合过程中省略了植入,以获得互补的见解。有趣的是,我们的分析揭示了MBM和ECM内部和之间肿瘤细胞表达谱的高度同质性。然而,MBM表现出更高的同质性,但更灵活的能量代谢,表明对假定的更有限的脑微环境有特定的转移适应。虽然肿瘤细胞是同质的,但转移微环境,特别是淋巴细胞和相关的免疫-肿瘤相互作用途径在MBM和ECM之间表现出更大的差异。总的来说,这表明MBM和ECM之间的主要差异可能是由其微环境的变化驱动的。最后,将单细胞数据与之前的大量研究进行比较,包括它们的假定细胞类型,显示出显著差异,可能导致不同的结论。结论:我们的研究有助于完善对MBM和ECM之间差异的理解,表明它们可能更多地受到当地微环境的影响。未来的研究和治疗可能会集中在黑色素瘤脑转移的代谢灵活性和患者特异性免疫途径的改变上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single-cell transcriptome analysis suggests cells of the tumor microenvironment as a major discriminator between brain and extracranial melanoma metastases.

Background: Despite therapeutic advances, metastatic melanoma, and particularly brain metastasis (MBM), remains a lethal burden for patients. Existing single-cell studies offer a more detailed view of melanoma and its microenvironment, which is crucial to improve diagnosis and treatment.

Results: We here present a computational reanalysis of single-nucleus data comparing 15 MBM and 10 extracranial melanoma metastases (ECM), considering recent best practice recommendations. We used cell type-specific pseudobulking and omit imputation during patient integration to gain complementary insights. Interestingly, our analysis revealed high homogeneity in tumor cell expression profiles within and between MBM and ECM. However, MBM displayed even higher homogeneity but a more flexible energy metabolism, suggesting a specific metastatic adaptation to the putatively more restricted brain microenvironment. While tumor cells were homogeneous, the metastasis microenvironment, especially lymphocytes and related immune-tumor interaction pathways, exhibited greater divergence between MBM and ECM. Overall, this suggests that major differences between MBM and ECM are potentially driven by variations in their microenvironment. Finally, a comparison of single-cell data to previous bulk studies, including their deconvoluted putative cell types, showed significant differences, potentially causing divergent conclusions.

Conclusion: Our study contributed to refine the understanding of differences between MBM and ECM, suggesting these are potentially more influenced by their local microenvironments. Future research and therapies could possibly focus on the metabolic flexibility of melanoma brain metastases and patient-specific immune pathway alterations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biology Direct
Biology Direct 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
32
审稿时长
7 months
期刊介绍: Biology Direct serves the life science research community as an open access, peer-reviewed online journal, providing authors and readers with an alternative to the traditional model of peer review. Biology Direct considers original research articles, hypotheses, comments, discovery notes and reviews in subject areas currently identified as those most conducive to the open review approach, primarily those with a significant non-experimental component.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信