类风湿关节炎患者的临床结果在三级保健综合交付网络护理途径队列:与常规护理比较。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Tarun Sharma, Tyson S Barrett, Teigan Dwyer, Nancy Campbell, Jessica Heintzinger, Ellen Kraemer, Adam Dore, Susan Manzi
{"title":"类风湿关节炎患者的临床结果在三级保健综合交付网络护理途径队列:与常规护理比较。","authors":"Tarun Sharma, Tyson S Barrett, Teigan Dwyer, Nancy Campbell, Jessica Heintzinger, Ellen Kraemer, Adam Dore, Susan Manzi","doi":"10.1002/acr.25649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to compare clinical outcomes between patients in the Allegheny Health Network rheumatoid arthritis (RA) care pathway and patients receiving usual care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The care pathway initiative implements guideline-based best practice alongside multi-disciplinary team-based care. Clinical and insurance claims data were extracted to compare the proportion of patients in clinical disease activity index (CDAI)-based remission and evaluate health care utilization and per member per month (PMPM) costs of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RA care pathway cohort included 817 patients, and the usual care cohort included 3651 patients. The care pathway cohort had a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving remission at 6, 12, and 24 months (33.5% vs 20.3%, hazard ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval 1.11-2.10, p = 0.008 at 24 months), and on average, 64 days earlier than usual care. This trend was also observed when including low disease activity patients with patients in remission and in a subgroup analysis of newly-diagnosed RA. RA-related PMPM costs were significantly higher in the care pathway group and primarily related to higher baseline CDAI, comorbidities, and biologic/targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug use and switching.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients in our RA care pathway were more likely to achieve remission than usual care. PMPM RA costs were higher compared to usual care. We plan to use a longer follow-up to investigate if improved clinical outcomes result in reduced direct and indirect costs, to study the impact of individual team-based care interventions, and to validate our findings in other populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes Of Patients Within The Rheumatoid Arthritis Care Pathway Cohort At a Tertiary Care Integrated Delivery Network: A Comparison To Usual Care.\",\"authors\":\"Tarun Sharma, Tyson S Barrett, Teigan Dwyer, Nancy Campbell, Jessica Heintzinger, Ellen Kraemer, Adam Dore, Susan Manzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acr.25649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to compare clinical outcomes between patients in the Allegheny Health Network rheumatoid arthritis (RA) care pathway and patients receiving usual care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The care pathway initiative implements guideline-based best practice alongside multi-disciplinary team-based care. Clinical and insurance claims data were extracted to compare the proportion of patients in clinical disease activity index (CDAI)-based remission and evaluate health care utilization and per member per month (PMPM) costs of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RA care pathway cohort included 817 patients, and the usual care cohort included 3651 patients. The care pathway cohort had a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving remission at 6, 12, and 24 months (33.5% vs 20.3%, hazard ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval 1.11-2.10, p = 0.008 at 24 months), and on average, 64 days earlier than usual care. This trend was also observed when including low disease activity patients with patients in remission and in a subgroup analysis of newly-diagnosed RA. RA-related PMPM costs were significantly higher in the care pathway group and primarily related to higher baseline CDAI, comorbidities, and biologic/targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug use and switching.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients in our RA care pathway were more likely to achieve remission than usual care. PMPM RA costs were higher compared to usual care. We plan to use a longer follow-up to investigate if improved clinical outcomes result in reduced direct and indirect costs, to study the impact of individual team-based care interventions, and to validate our findings in other populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthritis Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthritis Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25649\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25649","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在比较阿勒格尼健康网络类风湿关节炎(RA)护理途径患者和接受常规护理的患者的临床结果。方法:护理途径倡议在多学科团队护理的基础上实施基于指南的最佳实践。提取临床和保险索赔数据,以比较基于临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)缓解的患者比例,并评估医疗保健利用率和每个成员每月(PMPM)的医疗费用。结果:RA护理路径队列纳入817例患者,常规护理队列纳入3651例患者。护理途径队列在6、12和24个月时获得缓解的患者比例显著高于常规护理(33.5% vs 20.3%,风险比1.53,95%可信区间1.11-2.10,24个月时p = 0.008),平均比常规护理早64天。当包括疾病活动度低的患者和缓解期患者以及新诊断RA的亚组分析时,也观察到这种趋势。ra相关的PMPM费用在护理途径组中显著较高,主要与较高的基线CDAI、合并症和生物/靶向合成疾病改变抗风湿药物的使用和转换有关。结论:我们的RA护理途径的患者比常规护理更有可能获得缓解。与常规护理相比,PMPM RA的费用更高。我们计划使用更长的随访来调查改善的临床结果是否会降低直接和间接成本,研究个体团队护理干预的影响,并在其他人群中验证我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Outcomes Of Patients Within The Rheumatoid Arthritis Care Pathway Cohort At a Tertiary Care Integrated Delivery Network: A Comparison To Usual Care.

Objective: We aimed to compare clinical outcomes between patients in the Allegheny Health Network rheumatoid arthritis (RA) care pathway and patients receiving usual care.

Methods: The care pathway initiative implements guideline-based best practice alongside multi-disciplinary team-based care. Clinical and insurance claims data were extracted to compare the proportion of patients in clinical disease activity index (CDAI)-based remission and evaluate health care utilization and per member per month (PMPM) costs of care.

Results: The RA care pathway cohort included 817 patients, and the usual care cohort included 3651 patients. The care pathway cohort had a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving remission at 6, 12, and 24 months (33.5% vs 20.3%, hazard ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval 1.11-2.10, p = 0.008 at 24 months), and on average, 64 days earlier than usual care. This trend was also observed when including low disease activity patients with patients in remission and in a subgroup analysis of newly-diagnosed RA. RA-related PMPM costs were significantly higher in the care pathway group and primarily related to higher baseline CDAI, comorbidities, and biologic/targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug use and switching.

Conclusion: Patients in our RA care pathway were more likely to achieve remission than usual care. PMPM RA costs were higher compared to usual care. We plan to use a longer follow-up to investigate if improved clinical outcomes result in reduced direct and indirect costs, to study the impact of individual team-based care interventions, and to validate our findings in other populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
368
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信