痴呆症护理人员数字化健康干预的过程评估:整合主动和被动测量

IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kang Shen, Y. Alicia Hong, Yixuan (Janice) Zhang, Hae-Ra Han, Jessica Lin, Kenneth Hepburn
{"title":"痴呆症护理人员数字化健康干预的过程评估:整合主动和被动测量","authors":"Kang Shen,&nbsp;Y. Alicia Hong,&nbsp;Yixuan (Janice) Zhang,&nbsp;Hae-Ra Han,&nbsp;Jessica Lin,&nbsp;Kenneth Hepburn","doi":"10.1002/alz.70663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>Research is limited on process evaluation of digital interventions for underserved dementia caregivers. This study reports the design and results from the process evaluation of Wellness Enhancement for Caregivers (WECARE) 2.0, a culturally tailored digital intervention for Chinese American dementia caregivers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>During the 7-week trial of WECARE 2.0, active measurement via weekly surveys and passive measurement via backend tracking were used to assess user engagement, collect timely feedback, and understand intervention mechanisms. These data were integrated to provide complementary insights.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>The intervention achieved a 94% follow-up rate and 82% program completion rate. Participants valued the culturally tailored multimedia content, practical resources, and asynchronous delivery, while also providing suggestions for improvement. Key mechanisms driving the intervention's success included improved caregiving skills, stress reduction, and increased social support.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>The study underscores the importance of process evaluation using mixed methods to ensure the usability and effectiveness of digital interventions for underserved dementia caregivers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> CLINICALTRIALS ID</h3>\n \n <p>NCT05992467</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Process evaluation was conducted in a digital intervention for dementia caregivers.</li>\n \n <li>Active and passive measurement were integrated in the process evaluation.</li>\n \n <li>Wellness Enhancement for Caregivers (WECARE) demonstrated high retention (94%) and program completion rates (82%).</li>\n \n <li>Data on user experiences, feedback, and intervention mechanisms were presented.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"21 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12438464/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Process evaluation of a digital health intervention for dementia caregivers: Integrating active and passive measurements\",\"authors\":\"Kang Shen,&nbsp;Y. Alicia Hong,&nbsp;Yixuan (Janice) Zhang,&nbsp;Hae-Ra Han,&nbsp;Jessica Lin,&nbsp;Kenneth Hepburn\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/alz.70663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\\n \\n <p>Research is limited on process evaluation of digital interventions for underserved dementia caregivers. This study reports the design and results from the process evaluation of Wellness Enhancement for Caregivers (WECARE) 2.0, a culturally tailored digital intervention for Chinese American dementia caregivers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> METHODS</h3>\\n \\n <p>During the 7-week trial of WECARE 2.0, active measurement via weekly surveys and passive measurement via backend tracking were used to assess user engagement, collect timely feedback, and understand intervention mechanisms. These data were integrated to provide complementary insights.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\\n \\n <p>The intervention achieved a 94% follow-up rate and 82% program completion rate. Participants valued the culturally tailored multimedia content, practical resources, and asynchronous delivery, while also providing suggestions for improvement. Key mechanisms driving the intervention's success included improved caregiving skills, stress reduction, and increased social support.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study underscores the importance of process evaluation using mixed methods to ensure the usability and effectiveness of digital interventions for underserved dementia caregivers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> CLINICALTRIALS ID</h3>\\n \\n <p>NCT05992467</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Highlights</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>Process evaluation was conducted in a digital intervention for dementia caregivers.</li>\\n \\n <li>Active and passive measurement were integrated in the process evaluation.</li>\\n \\n <li>Wellness Enhancement for Caregivers (WECARE) demonstrated high retention (94%) and program completion rates (82%).</li>\\n \\n <li>Data on user experiences, feedback, and intervention mechanisms were presented.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer's & Dementia\",\"volume\":\"21 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12438464/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer's & Dementia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.70663\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.70663","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:对服务不足的痴呆症护理人员的数字干预过程评估的研究有限。本研究报告了照顾者健康增强(WECARE) 2.0的设计和过程评估结果,这是一个针对华裔美国痴呆症照顾者的文化定制数字干预。方法:在为期7周的WECARE 2.0试验中,采用每周调查的主动测量法和后端跟踪的被动测量法评估用户参与度,及时收集反馈,了解干预机制。这些数据被整合以提供互补的见解。结果:干预后随访率达94%,项目完成率达82%。与会者对多媒体内容、实用资源和异步传递的文化定制化评价很高,同时也提出了改进建议。推动干预成功的关键机制包括提高护理技能、减轻压力和增加社会支持。讨论:该研究强调了使用混合方法进行过程评估的重要性,以确保对服务不足的痴呆症护理人员进行数字干预的可用性和有效性。临床试验id: NCT05992467亮点:在痴呆症护理人员的数字干预中进行了过程评估。将主动测量与被动测量相结合,进行工艺评价。护理人员健康增强(WECARE)显示出较高的保留率(94%)和项目完成率(82%)。介绍了用户体验、反馈和干预机制方面的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Process evaluation of a digital health intervention for dementia caregivers: Integrating active and passive measurements

Process evaluation of a digital health intervention for dementia caregivers: Integrating active and passive measurements

Process evaluation of a digital health intervention for dementia caregivers: Integrating active and passive measurements

Process evaluation of a digital health intervention for dementia caregivers: Integrating active and passive measurements

Process evaluation of a digital health intervention for dementia caregivers: Integrating active and passive measurements

INTRODUCTION

Research is limited on process evaluation of digital interventions for underserved dementia caregivers. This study reports the design and results from the process evaluation of Wellness Enhancement for Caregivers (WECARE) 2.0, a culturally tailored digital intervention for Chinese American dementia caregivers.

METHODS

During the 7-week trial of WECARE 2.0, active measurement via weekly surveys and passive measurement via backend tracking were used to assess user engagement, collect timely feedback, and understand intervention mechanisms. These data were integrated to provide complementary insights.

RESULTS

The intervention achieved a 94% follow-up rate and 82% program completion rate. Participants valued the culturally tailored multimedia content, practical resources, and asynchronous delivery, while also providing suggestions for improvement. Key mechanisms driving the intervention's success included improved caregiving skills, stress reduction, and increased social support.

DISCUSSION

The study underscores the importance of process evaluation using mixed methods to ensure the usability and effectiveness of digital interventions for underserved dementia caregivers.

CLINICALTRIALS ID

NCT05992467

Highlights

  • Process evaluation was conducted in a digital intervention for dementia caregivers.
  • Active and passive measurement were integrated in the process evaluation.
  • Wellness Enhancement for Caregivers (WECARE) demonstrated high retention (94%) and program completion rates (82%).
  • Data on user experiences, feedback, and intervention mechanisms were presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信