F C A Lima,S De Moraes,S C Sartoretto,P S Nunes,C M S F Dos Santos,B Ghiraldini,F J B Bezerra,J M Granjeiro,M D Calasans-Maia,R S Louro
{"title":"磷酸钙种植体周围移植能改善种植体的骨整合吗?一项实验性体内研究。","authors":"F C A Lima,S De Moraes,S C Sartoretto,P S Nunes,C M S F Dos Santos,B Ghiraldini,F J B Bezerra,J M Granjeiro,M D Calasans-Maia,R S Louro","doi":"10.1111/clr.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nThis in vivo study aimed to evaluate the osseointegration of dental implants with a nanostructured hydroxyapatite (HAnano) coating or a double acid-etched (DAA) surface, grafted with or without calcium phosphate in the peri-implant gap, in low-density bone in a sheep model.\r\n\r\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\r\nThirty implants (15 HAnano and 15 DAA) were installed in the iliac crest of five sheep (2-4 years old). Six implants were placed per animal: two with a xenograft biomaterial, two with an alloplastic biomaterial, and two without grafting (control). Microtomographic analyses evaluated the percentage of bone and biomaterial for all groups. Histomorphometric analysis assessed bone-implant contact (BIC), bone occupied area fraction (BAFo), and biomaterial presence after an 8-week healing period. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA or mixed-effects models with a significance level of 0.05.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nNo complications were observed during the healing period. The average BIC across all groups was 55%, ranging from 4.6% to 67.7%. BAFo averaged 30%, with biomaterial occupying 22% and connective tissue 44% of the interface area. There were no statistically significant differences between grafted and non-grafted groups for BIC (p = 0.413), BAFo (p = 0.097), connective tissue presence (p = 0.192), and for the percentage of bone and biomaterial (p = 0.959), bone percentage (p = 0.283), or biomaterial percentage (p > 0.0959).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nPeri-implant grafting with xenograft or alloplastic biomaterials did not significantly enhance osseointegration compared to ungrafted implants in small peri-implant defects. These results suggest that spontaneous healing may suffice in such cases.","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Calcium Phosphate Peri-Implant Grafting Improve Osseointegration of Dental Implants? An Experimental In Vivo Study.\",\"authors\":\"F C A Lima,S De Moraes,S C Sartoretto,P S Nunes,C M S F Dos Santos,B Ghiraldini,F J B Bezerra,J M Granjeiro,M D Calasans-Maia,R S Louro\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/clr.70046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nThis in vivo study aimed to evaluate the osseointegration of dental implants with a nanostructured hydroxyapatite (HAnano) coating or a double acid-etched (DAA) surface, grafted with or without calcium phosphate in the peri-implant gap, in low-density bone in a sheep model.\\r\\n\\r\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\r\\nThirty implants (15 HAnano and 15 DAA) were installed in the iliac crest of five sheep (2-4 years old). Six implants were placed per animal: two with a xenograft biomaterial, two with an alloplastic biomaterial, and two without grafting (control). Microtomographic analyses evaluated the percentage of bone and biomaterial for all groups. Histomorphometric analysis assessed bone-implant contact (BIC), bone occupied area fraction (BAFo), and biomaterial presence after an 8-week healing period. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA or mixed-effects models with a significance level of 0.05.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nNo complications were observed during the healing period. The average BIC across all groups was 55%, ranging from 4.6% to 67.7%. BAFo averaged 30%, with biomaterial occupying 22% and connective tissue 44% of the interface area. There were no statistically significant differences between grafted and non-grafted groups for BIC (p = 0.413), BAFo (p = 0.097), connective tissue presence (p = 0.192), and for the percentage of bone and biomaterial (p = 0.959), bone percentage (p = 0.283), or biomaterial percentage (p > 0.0959).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nPeri-implant grafting with xenograft or alloplastic biomaterials did not significantly enhance osseointegration compared to ungrafted implants in small peri-implant defects. These results suggest that spontaneous healing may suffice in such cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.70046\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.70046","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does Calcium Phosphate Peri-Implant Grafting Improve Osseointegration of Dental Implants? An Experimental In Vivo Study.
OBJECTIVE
This in vivo study aimed to evaluate the osseointegration of dental implants with a nanostructured hydroxyapatite (HAnano) coating or a double acid-etched (DAA) surface, grafted with or without calcium phosphate in the peri-implant gap, in low-density bone in a sheep model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Thirty implants (15 HAnano and 15 DAA) were installed in the iliac crest of five sheep (2-4 years old). Six implants were placed per animal: two with a xenograft biomaterial, two with an alloplastic biomaterial, and two without grafting (control). Microtomographic analyses evaluated the percentage of bone and biomaterial for all groups. Histomorphometric analysis assessed bone-implant contact (BIC), bone occupied area fraction (BAFo), and biomaterial presence after an 8-week healing period. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA or mixed-effects models with a significance level of 0.05.
RESULTS
No complications were observed during the healing period. The average BIC across all groups was 55%, ranging from 4.6% to 67.7%. BAFo averaged 30%, with biomaterial occupying 22% and connective tissue 44% of the interface area. There were no statistically significant differences between grafted and non-grafted groups for BIC (p = 0.413), BAFo (p = 0.097), connective tissue presence (p = 0.192), and for the percentage of bone and biomaterial (p = 0.959), bone percentage (p = 0.283), or biomaterial percentage (p > 0.0959).
CONCLUSION
Peri-implant grafting with xenograft or alloplastic biomaterials did not significantly enhance osseointegration compared to ungrafted implants in small peri-implant defects. These results suggest that spontaneous healing may suffice in such cases.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.