利用母亲的脑活动预测听力损失幼儿的听觉语言能力。

IF 2.2
Yu Zhai, Yajing Xing, Jianlong Zhao, XiangYu He, Kexin Jiang, Tengfei Zhang, Chunming Lu
{"title":"利用母亲的脑活动预测听力损失幼儿的听觉语言能力。","authors":"Yu Zhai, Yajing Xing, Jianlong Zhao, XiangYu He, Kexin Jiang, Tengfei Zhang, Chunming Lu","doi":"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Children with congenital hearing loss (HL) have auditory impairments that may place them at increased risk for delays or variability in language development. However, obtaining reliable brain markers for early classification of young children with HL versus those with normal hearing (NH), as well as for precise assessment of HL children's language ability, remains a challenge due to limitations in traditional neuroimaging techniques and theoretical frameworks. To address this gap, we propose the maternal mirror hypothesis, which suggests that brain activities of mothers might mirror or indirectly reflect children's auditory language ability, offering an additional and useful approach for obtaining brain markers of HL children in clinical assessment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Children aged 2-5 years with HL (<i>n</i> = 105) and NH (<i>n</i> = 89), along with their mothers, participated in the study. Brain activity in each mother-child dyad was simultaneously measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) while they watched a silent video together. From these data, we derived maternal and child intrapersonal brain functional connectivity (FC), as well as mother-child intersubject correlation (ISC). Children's language comprehension and production ability were assessed at baseline with a follow-up of their changes over 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>We found that maternal brain FC or mother-child ISC outperformed child-based FC in predicting HL children's language comprehension and production, as well as their plastic changes across 6 months. Moreover, brain markers predicting HL children's language ability did not differ between groups of HL and NH, whereas those brain markers that classified HL versus NH group status were not correlated with HL children's language ability. This dissociation suggests distinct neural mechanisms underlying HL pathology with brain deficits versus the compensatory mechanisms with the functional recovery of HL children. These findings support the maternal mirror hypothesis, having the potential to address traditional challenges in early functional assessment and prediction of HL children by providing a novel neuroimaging approach and an original theoretical framework.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30082027.</p>","PeriodicalId":520690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","volume":" ","pages":"4996-5020"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting the Auditory Language Ability of Young Children With Hearing Loss Using Their Mothers' Brain Activity.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Zhai, Yajing Xing, Jianlong Zhao, XiangYu He, Kexin Jiang, Tengfei Zhang, Chunming Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Children with congenital hearing loss (HL) have auditory impairments that may place them at increased risk for delays or variability in language development. However, obtaining reliable brain markers for early classification of young children with HL versus those with normal hearing (NH), as well as for precise assessment of HL children's language ability, remains a challenge due to limitations in traditional neuroimaging techniques and theoretical frameworks. To address this gap, we propose the maternal mirror hypothesis, which suggests that brain activities of mothers might mirror or indirectly reflect children's auditory language ability, offering an additional and useful approach for obtaining brain markers of HL children in clinical assessment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Children aged 2-5 years with HL (<i>n</i> = 105) and NH (<i>n</i> = 89), along with their mothers, participated in the study. Brain activity in each mother-child dyad was simultaneously measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) while they watched a silent video together. From these data, we derived maternal and child intrapersonal brain functional connectivity (FC), as well as mother-child intersubject correlation (ISC). Children's language comprehension and production ability were assessed at baseline with a follow-up of their changes over 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>We found that maternal brain FC or mother-child ISC outperformed child-based FC in predicting HL children's language comprehension and production, as well as their plastic changes across 6 months. Moreover, brain markers predicting HL children's language ability did not differ between groups of HL and NH, whereas those brain markers that classified HL versus NH group status were not correlated with HL children's language ability. This dissociation suggests distinct neural mechanisms underlying HL pathology with brain deficits versus the compensatory mechanisms with the functional recovery of HL children. These findings support the maternal mirror hypothesis, having the potential to address traditional challenges in early functional assessment and prediction of HL children by providing a novel neuroimaging approach and an original theoretical framework.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30082027.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4996-5020\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:患有先天性听力损失(HL)的儿童有听觉障碍,这可能使他们面临语言发育迟缓或变异的风险增加。然而,由于传统的神经成像技术和理论框架的限制,获得可靠的大脑标记物来早期分类HL儿童与正常听力儿童(NH),以及精确评估HL儿童的语言能力,仍然是一个挑战。为了解决这一差距,我们提出了母亲镜像假说,该假说认为母亲的大脑活动可能反映或间接反映儿童的听觉语言能力,为在临床评估中获得HL儿童的大脑标志物提供了一种额外的有用方法。方法:2-5岁HL (n = 105)和NH (n = 89)患儿及其母亲参与研究。当母亲和孩子一起观看无声视频时,他们的大脑活动同时用功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)来测量。从这些数据中,我们得出了母亲和儿童的个人大脑功能连接(FC),以及母子主体间相关性(ISC)。在基线时评估儿童的语言理解和语言表达能力,并随访6个月以上的变化。结果和结论:我们发现母亲脑FC或母子脑ISC在预测HL儿童6个月的语言理解和语言生产及其可塑性变化方面优于基于儿童的FC。此外,预测HL儿童语言能力的脑标记物在HL和NH组之间没有差异,而分类HL和NH组状态的脑标记物与HL儿童的语言能力没有相关性。这种分离表明,与HL儿童功能恢复的代偿机制相比,HL病理伴脑缺陷的神经机制不同。这些发现支持母体镜像假说,通过提供一种新颖的神经影像学方法和原始的理论框架,有可能解决HL儿童早期功能评估和预测的传统挑战。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30082027。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting the Auditory Language Ability of Young Children With Hearing Loss Using Their Mothers' Brain Activity.

Purpose: Children with congenital hearing loss (HL) have auditory impairments that may place them at increased risk for delays or variability in language development. However, obtaining reliable brain markers for early classification of young children with HL versus those with normal hearing (NH), as well as for precise assessment of HL children's language ability, remains a challenge due to limitations in traditional neuroimaging techniques and theoretical frameworks. To address this gap, we propose the maternal mirror hypothesis, which suggests that brain activities of mothers might mirror or indirectly reflect children's auditory language ability, offering an additional and useful approach for obtaining brain markers of HL children in clinical assessment.

Method: Children aged 2-5 years with HL (n = 105) and NH (n = 89), along with their mothers, participated in the study. Brain activity in each mother-child dyad was simultaneously measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) while they watched a silent video together. From these data, we derived maternal and child intrapersonal brain functional connectivity (FC), as well as mother-child intersubject correlation (ISC). Children's language comprehension and production ability were assessed at baseline with a follow-up of their changes over 6 months.

Results and conclusions: We found that maternal brain FC or mother-child ISC outperformed child-based FC in predicting HL children's language comprehension and production, as well as their plastic changes across 6 months. Moreover, brain markers predicting HL children's language ability did not differ between groups of HL and NH, whereas those brain markers that classified HL versus NH group status were not correlated with HL children's language ability. This dissociation suggests distinct neural mechanisms underlying HL pathology with brain deficits versus the compensatory mechanisms with the functional recovery of HL children. These findings support the maternal mirror hypothesis, having the potential to address traditional challenges in early functional assessment and prediction of HL children by providing a novel neuroimaging approach and an original theoretical framework.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30082027.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信