β-内酰胺辅助治疗与万古霉素或达托霉素单药治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌血症的成人患者的比较:最新的系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序列分析

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Changyun Zhao, Wenchao Mao, Difan Lu, Kailun Cai, Changqin Chen, Weihang Hu, Shanmei Lv, Qi Yang
{"title":"β-内酰胺辅助治疗与万古霉素或达托霉素单药治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌血症的成人患者的比较:最新的系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序列分析","authors":"Changyun Zhao, Wenchao Mao, Difan Lu, Kailun Cai, Changqin Chen, Weihang Hu, Shanmei Lv, Qi Yang","doi":"10.1155/cjid/3972494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of vancomycin (VAN) or daptomycin (DAP) combined with β-lactams (BLs) versus monotherapy (STAN) for <i>methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) bacteremia. <b>Methods:</b> PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched until September 30, 2024, for RCTs or cohort studies comparing combination therapy (COMBO) and STAN in adult MRSA bacteremia. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, 30-day mortality, clinical failure, and safety. Subgroup and trial sequential analyses were performed. <b>Results:</b> Among 22 studies (3214 patients), the COMBO group did not reduce all-cause mortality (RR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.91-1.48, <i>p</i>=0.24) and 30-day mortality (RR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.86-1.62, <i>p</i>=0.31). Subgroup analyses suggested increased all-cause mortality in high-quality studies (RR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.00-1.67, <i>p</i>=0.05). Additionally, when VAN/DAP was administered randomly, COMBO was associated with higher all-cause mortality (RR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.05-1.78, <i>p</i>=0.02) and 30-day mortality (RR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.01-1.96, <i>p</i>=0.02). However, the COMBO reduced clinical failure rate (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.93, <i>p</i>=0.006), persistent bacteremia (RR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.54-0.92, <i>p</i>=0.01), and relapsed bacteremia (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.48-0.80, <i>p</i>=0.0003). No differences were observed in the microbiological failure rate, duration of bacteremia, or length of hospital stay. Furthermore, the COMBO group showed no significant increase in the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). <b>Conclusions:</b> COMBO did not lower mortality in MRSA bacteremia and may increase risk in certain subgroups. However, it improved microbiological outcomes without raising AKI risk. However, these microbiological advantages must be weighed against two concerning findings: a nonsignificant trend toward increased Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) risk and elevated mortality signals in high-quality subgroup analyses. Given conflicting mortality signals, cautious clinical application and further RCTs are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50715,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology","volume":"2025 ","pages":"3972494"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12425631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"β-Lactam Adjunctive Therapy Compared to Vancomycin or Daptomycin Monotherapy in Adult Patients With Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Bacteremia: An Update Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Changyun Zhao, Wenchao Mao, Difan Lu, Kailun Cai, Changqin Chen, Weihang Hu, Shanmei Lv, Qi Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/cjid/3972494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of vancomycin (VAN) or daptomycin (DAP) combined with β-lactams (BLs) versus monotherapy (STAN) for <i>methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) bacteremia. <b>Methods:</b> PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched until September 30, 2024, for RCTs or cohort studies comparing combination therapy (COMBO) and STAN in adult MRSA bacteremia. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, 30-day mortality, clinical failure, and safety. Subgroup and trial sequential analyses were performed. <b>Results:</b> Among 22 studies (3214 patients), the COMBO group did not reduce all-cause mortality (RR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.91-1.48, <i>p</i>=0.24) and 30-day mortality (RR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.86-1.62, <i>p</i>=0.31). Subgroup analyses suggested increased all-cause mortality in high-quality studies (RR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.00-1.67, <i>p</i>=0.05). Additionally, when VAN/DAP was administered randomly, COMBO was associated with higher all-cause mortality (RR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.05-1.78, <i>p</i>=0.02) and 30-day mortality (RR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.01-1.96, <i>p</i>=0.02). However, the COMBO reduced clinical failure rate (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.93, <i>p</i>=0.006), persistent bacteremia (RR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.54-0.92, <i>p</i>=0.01), and relapsed bacteremia (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.48-0.80, <i>p</i>=0.0003). No differences were observed in the microbiological failure rate, duration of bacteremia, or length of hospital stay. Furthermore, the COMBO group showed no significant increase in the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). <b>Conclusions:</b> COMBO did not lower mortality in MRSA bacteremia and may increase risk in certain subgroups. However, it improved microbiological outcomes without raising AKI risk. However, these microbiological advantages must be weighed against two concerning findings: a nonsignificant trend toward increased Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) risk and elevated mortality signals in high-quality subgroup analyses. Given conflicting mortality signals, cautious clinical application and further RCTs are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"3972494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12425631/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/cjid/3972494\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/cjid/3972494","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究评价万古霉素(VAN)或达托霉素(DAP)联合β-内酰胺类药物(BLs)与单药治疗(STAN)治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)菌血症的疗效和安全性。方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase和Cochrane Library,检索到2024年9月30日为止比较联合治疗(COMBO)和STAN治疗成人MRSA菌血症的随机对照试验或队列研究。结果包括全因死亡率、30天死亡率、临床失败和安全性。进行亚组分析和试验序列分析。结果:在22项研究(3214例患者)中,COMBO组没有降低全因死亡率(RR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.91-1.48, p=0.24)和30天死亡率(RR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.86-1.62, p=0.31)。亚组分析显示,高质量研究的全因死亡率增加(RR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.00-1.67, p=0.05)。此外,当随机给药VAN/DAP时,COMBO与较高的全因死亡率(RR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.05-1.78, p=0.02)和30天死亡率(RR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.01-1.96, p=0.02)相关。然而,COMBO降低了临床失败率(RR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.93, p=0.006)、持续性菌血症(RR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.54-0.92, p=0.01)和复发菌血症(RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.48-0.80, p=0.0003)。在微生物失败率、菌血症持续时间或住院时间方面没有观察到差异。此外,COMBO组急性肾损伤(AKI)发生率无显著增加。结论:COMBO不能降低MRSA菌血症的死亡率,可能会增加某些亚组的风险。然而,它在不增加AKI风险的情况下改善了微生物结果。然而,这些微生物学上的优势必须与两个相关的发现相权衡:难辨梭菌感染(CDI)风险增加的不显著趋势和高质量亚组分析中死亡率升高的信号。鉴于相互矛盾的死亡率信号,需要谨慎的临床应用和进一步的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

β-Lactam Adjunctive Therapy Compared to Vancomycin or Daptomycin Monotherapy in Adult Patients With Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Bacteremia: An Update Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis.

β-Lactam Adjunctive Therapy Compared to Vancomycin or Daptomycin Monotherapy in Adult Patients With Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Bacteremia: An Update Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis.

β-Lactam Adjunctive Therapy Compared to Vancomycin or Daptomycin Monotherapy in Adult Patients With Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Bacteremia: An Update Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis.

β-Lactam Adjunctive Therapy Compared to Vancomycin or Daptomycin Monotherapy in Adult Patients With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: An Update Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis.

Background: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of vancomycin (VAN) or daptomycin (DAP) combined with β-lactams (BLs) versus monotherapy (STAN) for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched until September 30, 2024, for RCTs or cohort studies comparing combination therapy (COMBO) and STAN in adult MRSA bacteremia. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, 30-day mortality, clinical failure, and safety. Subgroup and trial sequential analyses were performed. Results: Among 22 studies (3214 patients), the COMBO group did not reduce all-cause mortality (RR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.91-1.48, p=0.24) and 30-day mortality (RR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.86-1.62, p=0.31). Subgroup analyses suggested increased all-cause mortality in high-quality studies (RR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.00-1.67, p=0.05). Additionally, when VAN/DAP was administered randomly, COMBO was associated with higher all-cause mortality (RR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.05-1.78, p=0.02) and 30-day mortality (RR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.01-1.96, p=0.02). However, the COMBO reduced clinical failure rate (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.93, p=0.006), persistent bacteremia (RR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.54-0.92, p=0.01), and relapsed bacteremia (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.48-0.80, p=0.0003). No differences were observed in the microbiological failure rate, duration of bacteremia, or length of hospital stay. Furthermore, the COMBO group showed no significant increase in the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). Conclusions: COMBO did not lower mortality in MRSA bacteremia and may increase risk in certain subgroups. However, it improved microbiological outcomes without raising AKI risk. However, these microbiological advantages must be weighed against two concerning findings: a nonsignificant trend toward increased Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) risk and elevated mortality signals in high-quality subgroup analyses. Given conflicting mortality signals, cautious clinical application and further RCTs are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to infectious diseases of bacterial, viral and parasitic origin. The journal welcomes articles describing research on pathogenesis, epidemiology of infection, diagnosis and treatment, antibiotics and resistance, and immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信