Carmen Torres, Mauricio R Papini, Michael A Huffman
{"title":"哺乳动物的心理自我治疗:自然观察与实验室研究之间的对话。","authors":"Carmen Torres, Mauricio R Papini, Michael A Huffman","doi":"10.1037/com0000428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of plants with medicinal properties by nonhuman animals has been extensively documented. However, little emphasis has been placed on evidence suggesting that animals also appear to use/consume substances with psychoactive properties. This psychological self-medication (PsycSM) hypothesis posits that the voluntary use of substances that alter emotional/mental states is guided by the substance's ability to reduce negative states or promote positive states. The objective of this narrative review is to provide a rigorous interpretation and critique of findings, point out contributions and limitations of available research, and provide a synthesis useful to design further studies aimed at testing the PsycSM hypothesis. Criteria derived from this hypothesis are used to establish behaviors as PsycSM examples. Areas for potentially useful interactions between field and laboratory research are specified. Anecdotal evidence from field observations suggests that animals voluntarily consume substances that affect their emotional state. Although laboratory research reviewed herein suggests that nonhuman animals intentionally consume substances that can affect their emotional/mental state, the underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood. One such mechanism is hypothesized to involve a reinforcement process produced by a change in the internal state contingent on substance consumption, whether to reduce negative emotions or to enhance positive emotions. The criteria for PsycSM developed in this review may guide further research into these effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological self-medication in mammals: A dialogue between natural observations and laboratory research.\",\"authors\":\"Carmen Torres, Mauricio R Papini, Michael A Huffman\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/com0000428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The use of plants with medicinal properties by nonhuman animals has been extensively documented. However, little emphasis has been placed on evidence suggesting that animals also appear to use/consume substances with psychoactive properties. This psychological self-medication (PsycSM) hypothesis posits that the voluntary use of substances that alter emotional/mental states is guided by the substance's ability to reduce negative states or promote positive states. The objective of this narrative review is to provide a rigorous interpretation and critique of findings, point out contributions and limitations of available research, and provide a synthesis useful to design further studies aimed at testing the PsycSM hypothesis. Criteria derived from this hypothesis are used to establish behaviors as PsycSM examples. Areas for potentially useful interactions between field and laboratory research are specified. Anecdotal evidence from field observations suggests that animals voluntarily consume substances that affect their emotional state. Although laboratory research reviewed herein suggests that nonhuman animals intentionally consume substances that can affect their emotional/mental state, the underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood. One such mechanism is hypothesized to involve a reinforcement process produced by a change in the internal state contingent on substance consumption, whether to reduce negative emotions or to enhance positive emotions. The criteria for PsycSM developed in this review may guide further research into these effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Comparative Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Comparative Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000428\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
非人类动物对具有药用价值的植物的使用已被广泛记载。然而,很少有人强调有证据表明动物似乎也会使用/消费具有精神活性的物质。这种心理自我治疗(PsycSM)假设认为,自愿使用改变情绪/精神状态的物质是由物质减少消极状态或促进积极状态的能力所引导的。这篇叙述性综述的目的是对研究结果提供严格的解释和批评,指出现有研究的贡献和局限性,并提供一个有用的综合,以设计进一步的研究,旨在测试PsycSM假设。从这个假设中得出的标准被用来建立作为PsycSM例子的行为。指定了在现场和实验室研究之间可能有用的相互作用的领域。来自实地观察的轶事证据表明,动物自愿食用影响其情绪状态的物质。尽管本文回顾的实验室研究表明,非人类动物会有意地摄入影响其情绪/精神状态的物质,但其潜在机制仍知之甚少。一种这样的机制被假设为涉及一个强化过程,该过程是由物质消耗引起的内部状态变化所产生的,无论是减少消极情绪还是增强积极情绪。本综述中制定的心理变态反应标准可能会指导对这些影响的进一步研究。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Psychological self-medication in mammals: A dialogue between natural observations and laboratory research.
The use of plants with medicinal properties by nonhuman animals has been extensively documented. However, little emphasis has been placed on evidence suggesting that animals also appear to use/consume substances with psychoactive properties. This psychological self-medication (PsycSM) hypothesis posits that the voluntary use of substances that alter emotional/mental states is guided by the substance's ability to reduce negative states or promote positive states. The objective of this narrative review is to provide a rigorous interpretation and critique of findings, point out contributions and limitations of available research, and provide a synthesis useful to design further studies aimed at testing the PsycSM hypothesis. Criteria derived from this hypothesis are used to establish behaviors as PsycSM examples. Areas for potentially useful interactions between field and laboratory research are specified. Anecdotal evidence from field observations suggests that animals voluntarily consume substances that affect their emotional state. Although laboratory research reviewed herein suggests that nonhuman animals intentionally consume substances that can affect their emotional/mental state, the underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood. One such mechanism is hypothesized to involve a reinforcement process produced by a change in the internal state contingent on substance consumption, whether to reduce negative emotions or to enhance positive emotions. The criteria for PsycSM developed in this review may guide further research into these effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Comparative Psychology publishes original research from a comparative perspective
on the behavior, cognition, perception, and social relationships of diverse species.