在儿科急诊科因动物咬伤入院的儿童破伤风疫苗接种状况的验证。

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-15 DOI:10.1080/21645515.2025.2559509
Mathilde Nibbio, Claire de Jorna, Marion Lagrée, Diariatou Diallo, Constance Leruste, Melany Liber, François Dubos
{"title":"在儿科急诊科因动物咬伤入院的儿童破伤风疫苗接种状况的验证。","authors":"Mathilde Nibbio, Claire de Jorna, Marion Lagrée, Diariatou Diallo, Constance Leruste, Melany Liber, François Dubos","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2025.2559509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Animal bites are high-risk wounds for tetanus. Our objective was to verify that children admitted to the pediatric emergency department (PED) for bites had reliable management of the risk of tetanus. This retrospective descriptive study was conducted at Lille University Hospital between 2015 and 2020. Patients under the age of 16 years admitted to the PED for bite wounds were included. The rate of appropriate management was calculated using a strict or pragmatic definition, based on the presentation or not of the health booklet. Among 336 patients included (median age 5 years, 47% boys, 69% wounds on the face; 90% of bites by dogs), 86% had their vaccination status mentioned in the medical observation, more often during daytime hours (<i>p</i> = .02) and by the medical team (as compared to the surgical team; <i>p</i> < 10<sup>-3</sup>). 90% of these were declared up-to-date for their tetanus vaccination. Management was deemed appropriate in 16% according to the strict definition and in 80% using the pragmatic definition. 28 patients were not up to date (10%). Eight of these 28 (29%) had an appropriate management. The management of a bite wound must be systematized with verification of tetanus vaccination status to avoid preventable disasters.</p>","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"21 1","pages":"2559509"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439565/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verification of tetanus vaccination status of children admitted for animal bites in a pediatric emergency department.\",\"authors\":\"Mathilde Nibbio, Claire de Jorna, Marion Lagrée, Diariatou Diallo, Constance Leruste, Melany Liber, François Dubos\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21645515.2025.2559509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Animal bites are high-risk wounds for tetanus. Our objective was to verify that children admitted to the pediatric emergency department (PED) for bites had reliable management of the risk of tetanus. This retrospective descriptive study was conducted at Lille University Hospital between 2015 and 2020. Patients under the age of 16 years admitted to the PED for bite wounds were included. The rate of appropriate management was calculated using a strict or pragmatic definition, based on the presentation or not of the health booklet. Among 336 patients included (median age 5 years, 47% boys, 69% wounds on the face; 90% of bites by dogs), 86% had their vaccination status mentioned in the medical observation, more often during daytime hours (<i>p</i> = .02) and by the medical team (as compared to the surgical team; <i>p</i> < 10<sup>-3</sup>). 90% of these were declared up-to-date for their tetanus vaccination. Management was deemed appropriate in 16% according to the strict definition and in 80% using the pragmatic definition. 28 patients were not up to date (10%). Eight of these 28 (29%) had an appropriate management. The management of a bite wound must be systematized with verification of tetanus vaccination status to avoid preventable disasters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"2559509\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439565/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2025.2559509\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2025.2559509","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动物咬伤是破伤风的高危伤口。我们的目的是验证因咬伤而入住儿科急诊科(PED)的儿童是否对破伤风风险有可靠的管理。这项回顾性描述性研究于2015年至2020年在里尔大学医院进行。包括因咬伤入院的16岁以下患者。采用严格或实用的定义计算适当管理的比率,以健康小册子的呈现与否为基础。在纳入的336例患者中(中位年龄5岁,47%为男孩,69%为面部伤口,90%为狗咬伤),86%的患者在医学观察中提到了他们的疫苗接种情况,更多的是在白天(p = 0.02)和医疗小组(与外科小组相比;p -3)。其中90%被宣布为最新的破伤风疫苗接种。根据严格定义,16%的人认为管理是适当的,而使用语用定义,80%的人认为管理是适当的。28例患者未更新(10%)。其中8个(29%)有适当的管理。咬伤的处理必须系统化,并核查破伤风疫苗接种情况,以避免可预防的灾难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Verification of tetanus vaccination status of children admitted for animal bites in a pediatric emergency department.

Verification of tetanus vaccination status of children admitted for animal bites in a pediatric emergency department.

Animal bites are high-risk wounds for tetanus. Our objective was to verify that children admitted to the pediatric emergency department (PED) for bites had reliable management of the risk of tetanus. This retrospective descriptive study was conducted at Lille University Hospital between 2015 and 2020. Patients under the age of 16 years admitted to the PED for bite wounds were included. The rate of appropriate management was calculated using a strict or pragmatic definition, based on the presentation or not of the health booklet. Among 336 patients included (median age 5 years, 47% boys, 69% wounds on the face; 90% of bites by dogs), 86% had their vaccination status mentioned in the medical observation, more often during daytime hours (p = .02) and by the medical team (as compared to the surgical team; p < 10-3). 90% of these were declared up-to-date for their tetanus vaccination. Management was deemed appropriate in 16% according to the strict definition and in 80% using the pragmatic definition. 28 patients were not up to date (10%). Eight of these 28 (29%) had an appropriate management. The management of a bite wound must be systematized with verification of tetanus vaccination status to avoid preventable disasters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-IMMUNOLOGY
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
489
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: (formerly Human Vaccines; issn 1554-8619) Vaccine research and development is extending its reach beyond the prevention of bacterial or viral diseases. There are experimental vaccines for immunotherapeutic purposes and for applications outside of infectious diseases, in diverse fields such as cancer, autoimmunity, allergy, Alzheimer’s and addiction. Many of these vaccines and immunotherapeutics should become available in the next two decades, with consequent benefit for human health. Continued advancement in this field will benefit from a forum that can (A) help to promote interest by keeping investigators updated, and (B) enable an exchange of ideas regarding the latest progress in the many topics pertaining to vaccines and immunotherapeutics. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics provides such a forum. It is published monthly in a format that is accessible to a wide international audience in the academic, industrial and public sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信