儿童微创龋齿去除过程中的疼痛感知:一项比较化学-机械龋齿去除的随机临床试验。

IF 2.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Dhirja Goel, Neha Awasthi, Yanina Singh, Sukhdeep Singh, Nenung Yirang
{"title":"儿童微创龋齿去除过程中的疼痛感知:一项比较化学-机械龋齿去除的随机临床试验。","authors":"Dhirja Goel, Neha Awasthi, Yanina Singh, Sukhdeep Singh, Nenung Yirang","doi":"10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_219_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Dental treatment-related pain causes fear and anxiety, particularly in children. Minimally invasive dentistry techniques, such as chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR) and atraumatic restorative treatment (ART), aim to minimize discomfort. This study evaluated and compared pain perception during caries removal using a CMCR agent (BRIX 3000) versus ART in children aged 4-8 years.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A randomized, two-arm clinical trial was conducted with 40 children aged 4-8, each with at least two carious lesions on primary molars. Children were randomly assigned to caries removal using either BRIX 3000 (CMCR) or ART. Pain was assessed using the sound, eye, and motor (SEM) scale and the Wong-Baker FACES scale. Data were analyzed statistically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the CMCR group, 67.5% of children had an SEM pain score of 0, while 70% had an SEM score of 0 in the ART group. The mean SEM pain scores were 0.43 ± 0.71 for CMCR and 0.40 ± 0.71 for ART. The mean Wong-Baker FACES pain scores were 0.45 ± 0.96 for CMCR and 0.60 ± 1.30 for ART. There was no statistically significant difference as the <i>P</i>-value was not less than 0.05 for pain scores between the two groups using either SEM (<i>P</i>-value = 0.785) or Wong-Baker FACES (<i>P</i>-value = 0.412) scales.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both CMCR with BRIX 3000<sup>™</sup> and ART were effective in minimizing pain during caries removal in young children. However, the difference in pain scores between the two groups was not statistically significant, as indicated by a <i>P</i>-value greater than 0.05 for both the SEM scale (<i>P</i> = 0.785) and the Wong-Baker FACES scale (<i>P</i> = 0.412).</p>","PeriodicalId":47247,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry","volume":"15 4","pages":"348-356"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12425395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain Perception During Minimally Invasive Caries Removal in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Chemo-Mechanical Caries Removal.\",\"authors\":\"Dhirja Goel, Neha Awasthi, Yanina Singh, Sukhdeep Singh, Nenung Yirang\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_219_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Dental treatment-related pain causes fear and anxiety, particularly in children. Minimally invasive dentistry techniques, such as chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR) and atraumatic restorative treatment (ART), aim to minimize discomfort. This study evaluated and compared pain perception during caries removal using a CMCR agent (BRIX 3000) versus ART in children aged 4-8 years.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A randomized, two-arm clinical trial was conducted with 40 children aged 4-8, each with at least two carious lesions on primary molars. Children were randomly assigned to caries removal using either BRIX 3000 (CMCR) or ART. Pain was assessed using the sound, eye, and motor (SEM) scale and the Wong-Baker FACES scale. Data were analyzed statistically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the CMCR group, 67.5% of children had an SEM pain score of 0, while 70% had an SEM score of 0 in the ART group. The mean SEM pain scores were 0.43 ± 0.71 for CMCR and 0.40 ± 0.71 for ART. The mean Wong-Baker FACES pain scores were 0.45 ± 0.96 for CMCR and 0.60 ± 1.30 for ART. There was no statistically significant difference as the <i>P</i>-value was not less than 0.05 for pain scores between the two groups using either SEM (<i>P</i>-value = 0.785) or Wong-Baker FACES (<i>P</i>-value = 0.412) scales.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both CMCR with BRIX 3000<sup>™</sup> and ART were effective in minimizing pain during caries removal in young children. However, the difference in pain scores between the two groups was not statistically significant, as indicated by a <i>P</i>-value greater than 0.05 for both the SEM scale (<i>P</i> = 0.785) and the Wong-Baker FACES scale (<i>P</i> = 0.412).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"348-356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12425395/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_219_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_219_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:与牙科治疗相关的疼痛会引起恐惧和焦虑,尤其是在儿童中。微创牙科技术,如化学机械龋齿去除(CMCR)和非创伤修复治疗(ART),旨在最大限度地减少不适。这项研究评估并比较了4-8岁儿童在使用CMCR剂(BRIX 3000)和ART除龋期间的疼痛感觉。材料与方法:对40名年龄在4-8岁的儿童进行随机、双组临床试验,每名儿童至少有两颗乳牙龋齿。儿童被随机分配使用BRIX 3000 (CMCR)或ART进行除龋。疼痛评估采用声、眼、运动(SEM)量表和Wong-Baker FACES量表。对数据进行统计学分析。结果:CMCR组67.5%的患儿SEM疼痛评分为0分,ART组70%的患儿SEM疼痛评分为0分。CMCR组的平均SEM疼痛评分为0.43±0.71,ART组为0.40±0.71。CMCR组的平均Wong-Baker FACES疼痛评分为0.45±0.96,ART组的平均Wong-Baker FACES疼痛评分为0.60±1.30。两组疼痛评分分别采用SEM (p值= 0.785)和Wong-Baker FACES (p值= 0.412)评分,p值均不小于0.05,差异无统计学意义。结论:CMCR联合BRIX 3000™和ART均能有效减少幼儿除龋过程中的疼痛。但两组疼痛评分差异无统计学意义,SEM量表(P = 0.785)和Wong-Baker FACES量表(P = 0.412)的P值均大于0.05。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Pain Perception During Minimally Invasive Caries Removal in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Chemo-Mechanical Caries Removal.

Pain Perception During Minimally Invasive Caries Removal in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Chemo-Mechanical Caries Removal.

Pain Perception During Minimally Invasive Caries Removal in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Chemo-Mechanical Caries Removal.

Pain Perception During Minimally Invasive Caries Removal in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Chemo-Mechanical Caries Removal.

Aim: Dental treatment-related pain causes fear and anxiety, particularly in children. Minimally invasive dentistry techniques, such as chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR) and atraumatic restorative treatment (ART), aim to minimize discomfort. This study evaluated and compared pain perception during caries removal using a CMCR agent (BRIX 3000) versus ART in children aged 4-8 years.

Materials and methods: A randomized, two-arm clinical trial was conducted with 40 children aged 4-8, each with at least two carious lesions on primary molars. Children were randomly assigned to caries removal using either BRIX 3000 (CMCR) or ART. Pain was assessed using the sound, eye, and motor (SEM) scale and the Wong-Baker FACES scale. Data were analyzed statistically.

Results: In the CMCR group, 67.5% of children had an SEM pain score of 0, while 70% had an SEM score of 0 in the ART group. The mean SEM pain scores were 0.43 ± 0.71 for CMCR and 0.40 ± 0.71 for ART. The mean Wong-Baker FACES pain scores were 0.45 ± 0.96 for CMCR and 0.60 ± 1.30 for ART. There was no statistically significant difference as the P-value was not less than 0.05 for pain scores between the two groups using either SEM (P-value = 0.785) or Wong-Baker FACES (P-value = 0.412) scales.

Conclusion: Both CMCR with BRIX 3000 and ART were effective in minimizing pain during caries removal in young children. However, the difference in pain scores between the two groups was not statistically significant, as indicated by a P-value greater than 0.05 for both the SEM scale (P = 0.785) and the Wong-Baker FACES scale (P = 0.412).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: It is a journal aimed for research, scientific facts and details covering all specialties of dentistry with a good determination for exploring and sharing the knowledge in the medical and dental fraternity. The scope is therefore huge covering almost all streams of dentistry - starting from original studies, systematic reviews, narrative reviews, very unique case reports. Journal scope is not limited to these subjects and is more wider covering all specialities of dentistry follows: -Preventive and Community dentistry (Dental public health)- Endodontics- Oral and maxillofacial pathology- Oral and maxillofacial radiology- Oral and maxillofacial surgery (also called oral surgery)- Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics- Periodontology (also called periodontics)- Pediatric dentistry (also called pedodontics)- Prosthodontics (also called prosthetic dentistry)- Oral medicine- Special needs dentistry (also called special care dentistry)- Oral Biology- Forensic odontology- Geriatric dentistry or Geriodontics- Preventive and Social Medicine (Public health)- Our journal appreciates research articles pertaining with advancement of dentistry, preventive and community dentistry including oral epidemiology, oral health services research, oral health education and promotion, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, dental jurisprudence, ethics and oral health, economics, and quality assessment, recent advances in preventive dentistry and community dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信