{"title":"儿童微创龋齿去除过程中的疼痛感知:一项比较化学-机械龋齿去除的随机临床试验。","authors":"Dhirja Goel, Neha Awasthi, Yanina Singh, Sukhdeep Singh, Nenung Yirang","doi":"10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_219_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Dental treatment-related pain causes fear and anxiety, particularly in children. Minimally invasive dentistry techniques, such as chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR) and atraumatic restorative treatment (ART), aim to minimize discomfort. This study evaluated and compared pain perception during caries removal using a CMCR agent (BRIX 3000) versus ART in children aged 4-8 years.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A randomized, two-arm clinical trial was conducted with 40 children aged 4-8, each with at least two carious lesions on primary molars. Children were randomly assigned to caries removal using either BRIX 3000 (CMCR) or ART. Pain was assessed using the sound, eye, and motor (SEM) scale and the Wong-Baker FACES scale. Data were analyzed statistically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the CMCR group, 67.5% of children had an SEM pain score of 0, while 70% had an SEM score of 0 in the ART group. The mean SEM pain scores were 0.43 ± 0.71 for CMCR and 0.40 ± 0.71 for ART. The mean Wong-Baker FACES pain scores were 0.45 ± 0.96 for CMCR and 0.60 ± 1.30 for ART. There was no statistically significant difference as the <i>P</i>-value was not less than 0.05 for pain scores between the two groups using either SEM (<i>P</i>-value = 0.785) or Wong-Baker FACES (<i>P</i>-value = 0.412) scales.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both CMCR with BRIX 3000<sup>™</sup> and ART were effective in minimizing pain during caries removal in young children. However, the difference in pain scores between the two groups was not statistically significant, as indicated by a <i>P</i>-value greater than 0.05 for both the SEM scale (<i>P</i> = 0.785) and the Wong-Baker FACES scale (<i>P</i> = 0.412).</p>","PeriodicalId":47247,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry","volume":"15 4","pages":"348-356"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12425395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain Perception During Minimally Invasive Caries Removal in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Chemo-Mechanical Caries Removal.\",\"authors\":\"Dhirja Goel, Neha Awasthi, Yanina Singh, Sukhdeep Singh, Nenung Yirang\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_219_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Dental treatment-related pain causes fear and anxiety, particularly in children. Minimally invasive dentistry techniques, such as chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR) and atraumatic restorative treatment (ART), aim to minimize discomfort. This study evaluated and compared pain perception during caries removal using a CMCR agent (BRIX 3000) versus ART in children aged 4-8 years.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A randomized, two-arm clinical trial was conducted with 40 children aged 4-8, each with at least two carious lesions on primary molars. Children were randomly assigned to caries removal using either BRIX 3000 (CMCR) or ART. Pain was assessed using the sound, eye, and motor (SEM) scale and the Wong-Baker FACES scale. Data were analyzed statistically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the CMCR group, 67.5% of children had an SEM pain score of 0, while 70% had an SEM score of 0 in the ART group. The mean SEM pain scores were 0.43 ± 0.71 for CMCR and 0.40 ± 0.71 for ART. The mean Wong-Baker FACES pain scores were 0.45 ± 0.96 for CMCR and 0.60 ± 1.30 for ART. There was no statistically significant difference as the <i>P</i>-value was not less than 0.05 for pain scores between the two groups using either SEM (<i>P</i>-value = 0.785) or Wong-Baker FACES (<i>P</i>-value = 0.412) scales.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both CMCR with BRIX 3000<sup>™</sup> and ART were effective in minimizing pain during caries removal in young children. However, the difference in pain scores between the two groups was not statistically significant, as indicated by a <i>P</i>-value greater than 0.05 for both the SEM scale (<i>P</i> = 0.785) and the Wong-Baker FACES scale (<i>P</i> = 0.412).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"348-356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12425395/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_219_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_219_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pain Perception During Minimally Invasive Caries Removal in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Chemo-Mechanical Caries Removal.
Aim: Dental treatment-related pain causes fear and anxiety, particularly in children. Minimally invasive dentistry techniques, such as chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR) and atraumatic restorative treatment (ART), aim to minimize discomfort. This study evaluated and compared pain perception during caries removal using a CMCR agent (BRIX 3000) versus ART in children aged 4-8 years.
Materials and methods: A randomized, two-arm clinical trial was conducted with 40 children aged 4-8, each with at least two carious lesions on primary molars. Children were randomly assigned to caries removal using either BRIX 3000 (CMCR) or ART. Pain was assessed using the sound, eye, and motor (SEM) scale and the Wong-Baker FACES scale. Data were analyzed statistically.
Results: In the CMCR group, 67.5% of children had an SEM pain score of 0, while 70% had an SEM score of 0 in the ART group. The mean SEM pain scores were 0.43 ± 0.71 for CMCR and 0.40 ± 0.71 for ART. The mean Wong-Baker FACES pain scores were 0.45 ± 0.96 for CMCR and 0.60 ± 1.30 for ART. There was no statistically significant difference as the P-value was not less than 0.05 for pain scores between the two groups using either SEM (P-value = 0.785) or Wong-Baker FACES (P-value = 0.412) scales.
Conclusion: Both CMCR with BRIX 3000™ and ART were effective in minimizing pain during caries removal in young children. However, the difference in pain scores between the two groups was not statistically significant, as indicated by a P-value greater than 0.05 for both the SEM scale (P = 0.785) and the Wong-Baker FACES scale (P = 0.412).
期刊介绍:
It is a journal aimed for research, scientific facts and details covering all specialties of dentistry with a good determination for exploring and sharing the knowledge in the medical and dental fraternity. The scope is therefore huge covering almost all streams of dentistry - starting from original studies, systematic reviews, narrative reviews, very unique case reports. Journal scope is not limited to these subjects and is more wider covering all specialities of dentistry follows: -Preventive and Community dentistry (Dental public health)- Endodontics- Oral and maxillofacial pathology- Oral and maxillofacial radiology- Oral and maxillofacial surgery (also called oral surgery)- Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics- Periodontology (also called periodontics)- Pediatric dentistry (also called pedodontics)- Prosthodontics (also called prosthetic dentistry)- Oral medicine- Special needs dentistry (also called special care dentistry)- Oral Biology- Forensic odontology- Geriatric dentistry or Geriodontics- Preventive and Social Medicine (Public health)- Our journal appreciates research articles pertaining with advancement of dentistry, preventive and community dentistry including oral epidemiology, oral health services research, oral health education and promotion, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, dental jurisprudence, ethics and oral health, economics, and quality assessment, recent advances in preventive dentistry and community dentistry.