在等待疼痛管理时持续存在心理困扰。

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lydia V Tidmarsh, Richard Harrison, Harriet Wilkinson, Megan Harrington, Deepak Ravindran, Sally Norwood, Katherine A Finlay
{"title":"在等待疼痛管理时持续存在心理困扰。","authors":"Lydia V Tidmarsh, Richard Harrison, Harriet Wilkinson, Megan Harrington, Deepak Ravindran, Sally Norwood, Katherine A Finlay","doi":"10.1177/20494637251377761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Waiting lists for pain management services globally are extensive, exacerbating the burden of chronic pain for patients and service providers. This study aimed to examine the psychological profiles of people living with chronic pain (PLwCP) during long treatment delay and use appropriate inferential analyses of waitlist data to identify potential demographic characteristics presenting at-risk subgroups.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A longitudinal survey design tracked measures of psychological wellbeing (pain self-efficacy, depression, anxiety and pain catastrophizing) in PLwCP (<i>N</i> = 211, Males = 50, Females = 161) on the waitlist for pain management, in a major regional NHS hospital in the Southeast of the UK. Measures were collected at baseline, three-months and six-months of waiting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regression and ANOVA models revealed that clinically significant levels of depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing and pain self-efficacy remained high throughout the waiting period, indicating sustained psychological distress. While pain self-efficacy significantly increased over time and though the effect size was small, levels were in the clinically severe range throughout the wait-time, thus requiring intervention. Older and younger adults showed different phenotypical patterns of psychosocial wellbeing whilst waiting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate that clinical levels of psychological distress are persistent and entrenched throughout the waitlist for pain management. PLwCP remain an at-risk population in significant need of earlier support. Prehabilitation offers a prospective framework through which early intervention can be achieved. Subgroups identified as greater risk are younger individuals and those with worse depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing and/or pain self-efficacy upon referral. These factors present stratification targets and direction of where prehabilitation is most urgently required. These findings have clear implications to improve pain practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20494637251377761"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12432014/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The persistence of psychological distress while waiting for pain management.\",\"authors\":\"Lydia V Tidmarsh, Richard Harrison, Harriet Wilkinson, Megan Harrington, Deepak Ravindran, Sally Norwood, Katherine A Finlay\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20494637251377761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Waiting lists for pain management services globally are extensive, exacerbating the burden of chronic pain for patients and service providers. This study aimed to examine the psychological profiles of people living with chronic pain (PLwCP) during long treatment delay and use appropriate inferential analyses of waitlist data to identify potential demographic characteristics presenting at-risk subgroups.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A longitudinal survey design tracked measures of psychological wellbeing (pain self-efficacy, depression, anxiety and pain catastrophizing) in PLwCP (<i>N</i> = 211, Males = 50, Females = 161) on the waitlist for pain management, in a major regional NHS hospital in the Southeast of the UK. Measures were collected at baseline, three-months and six-months of waiting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regression and ANOVA models revealed that clinically significant levels of depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing and pain self-efficacy remained high throughout the waiting period, indicating sustained psychological distress. While pain self-efficacy significantly increased over time and though the effect size was small, levels were in the clinically severe range throughout the wait-time, thus requiring intervention. Older and younger adults showed different phenotypical patterns of psychosocial wellbeing whilst waiting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate that clinical levels of psychological distress are persistent and entrenched throughout the waitlist for pain management. PLwCP remain an at-risk population in significant need of earlier support. Prehabilitation offers a prospective framework through which early intervention can be achieved. Subgroups identified as greater risk are younger individuals and those with worse depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing and/or pain self-efficacy upon referral. These factors present stratification targets and direction of where prehabilitation is most urgently required. These findings have clear implications to improve pain practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"20494637251377761\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12432014/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637251377761\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637251377761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:全球疼痛管理服务的等待名单很长,加剧了患者和服务提供者的慢性疼痛负担。本研究旨在研究长期治疗延迟期间慢性疼痛患者(PLwCP)的心理特征,并对候补名单数据进行适当的推断分析,以确定潜在的人口统计学特征,呈现高危亚组。方法:一项纵向调查设计跟踪测量心理健康(疼痛自我效能感,抑郁,焦虑和疼痛灾难化)在等待名单上的PLwCP (N = 211,男性= 50,女性= 161)疼痛管理,在英国东南部的一个主要地区NHS医院。在基线、3个月和6个月的等待期收集测量数据。结果:回归和方差分析模型显示,在整个等待期,抑郁、焦虑、疼痛灾难化和疼痛自我效能感的临床显著水平仍然很高,表明心理困扰持续存在。虽然疼痛自我效能感随着时间的推移而显著增加,尽管效应量很小,但在整个等待时间内,疼痛自我效能感水平处于临床严重范围内,因此需要干预。老年人和年轻人在等待时表现出不同的社会心理健康表型模式。结论:这些研究结果表明,心理困扰的临床水平是持续的,并且在疼痛管理的等待名单中根深蒂固。PLwCP仍然是非常需要早期支持的高危人群。康复提供了一个前瞻性框架,通过它可以实现早期干预。被确定为高风险的亚群是年轻人和那些转诊时抑郁、焦虑、疼痛灾难和/或疼痛自我效能更严重的人。这些因素提供了分层目标和最迫切需要修复的方向。这些发现对改善疼痛练习有明确的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The persistence of psychological distress while waiting for pain management.

Objectives: Waiting lists for pain management services globally are extensive, exacerbating the burden of chronic pain for patients and service providers. This study aimed to examine the psychological profiles of people living with chronic pain (PLwCP) during long treatment delay and use appropriate inferential analyses of waitlist data to identify potential demographic characteristics presenting at-risk subgroups.

Method: A longitudinal survey design tracked measures of psychological wellbeing (pain self-efficacy, depression, anxiety and pain catastrophizing) in PLwCP (N = 211, Males = 50, Females = 161) on the waitlist for pain management, in a major regional NHS hospital in the Southeast of the UK. Measures were collected at baseline, three-months and six-months of waiting.

Results: Regression and ANOVA models revealed that clinically significant levels of depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing and pain self-efficacy remained high throughout the waiting period, indicating sustained psychological distress. While pain self-efficacy significantly increased over time and though the effect size was small, levels were in the clinically severe range throughout the wait-time, thus requiring intervention. Older and younger adults showed different phenotypical patterns of psychosocial wellbeing whilst waiting.

Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that clinical levels of psychological distress are persistent and entrenched throughout the waitlist for pain management. PLwCP remain an at-risk population in significant need of earlier support. Prehabilitation offers a prospective framework through which early intervention can be achieved. Subgroups identified as greater risk are younger individuals and those with worse depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing and/or pain self-efficacy upon referral. These factors present stratification targets and direction of where prehabilitation is most urgently required. These findings have clear implications to improve pain practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Pain
British Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: British Journal of Pain is a peer-reviewed quarterly British journal with an international multidisciplinary Editorial Board. The journal publishes original research and reviews on all major aspects of pain and pain management. Reviews reflect the body of evidence of the topic and are suitable for a multidisciplinary readership. Where empirical evidence is lacking, the reviews reflect the generally held opinions of experts in the field. The Journal has broadened its scope and has become a forum for publishing primary research together with brief reports related to pain and pain interventions. Submissions from all over the world have been published and are welcome. Official journal of the British Pain Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信