Le Uyen Phuong Tran, Ngoc Dung Kieu, Cao Dat Tran, Tri-Thuc Nguyen, Van Sy Hoang, Truc Thanh Thai
{"title":"使用三维电解剖定位系统射频导管消融治疗室性心律失常的有效性和安全性:越南的一项单中心前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Le Uyen Phuong Tran, Ngoc Dung Kieu, Cao Dat Tran, Tri-Thuc Nguyen, Van Sy Hoang, Truc Thanh Thai","doi":"10.2147/VHRM.S549819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Advanced catheter ablation using three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping (EAM) has shown favorable outcomes in high-income countries, but real-world evidence from low- and middle-income settings is scarce. This study aimed to assess the clinical characteristics, procedural features, and outcomes of radiofrequency ablation using EAM in patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) at a tertiary cardiac center in Vietnam.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 233 patients who underwent VT and PVC ablation at Cho Ray Hospital from March 2021 to December 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with the cut-off value of 50%: reduced (LVEF < 50%, n = 39) and preserved (LVEF ≥ 50%, n = 194). Data on demographics, arrhythmia burden, ablation protocol, and follow-up outcomes were collected and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with reduced LVEF more frequently presented with ventricular tachycardia (23.1% vs 6.7%, p < 0.001), ischemic heart disease (23.1% vs 7.7%, p = 0.008), and were more likely to require irrigated catheters (46.2% vs 20.1%, p = 0.001). The PVC burden prior to ablation was significantly different between groups (36.3% ± 17.2 vs 27.8% ± 12.2, p = 0.014) and patients with reduced LVEF exhibited remarkable recovery after ablation, with LVEF improving from 33.7 ± 8.1 to 55.2 ± 9.1 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The acute ablation success rate was 100% in both groups. The procedure demonstrated high levels of safety, with a non-severe complication rate of 4.7% (n = 11) and low radiation exposure (median 16 mGy [inter-quartile range: 11-26]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Catheter ablation is highly effective and safe in treating ventricular arrhythmias across different LVEF, especially in ventricular arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy group, leading to rapid recovery of left ventricular function and reduction in arrhythmia burden. These findings provide important real-world evidence from a resource limited setting, providing multiple use of catheters and skin patches.</p>","PeriodicalId":23597,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Health and Risk Management","volume":"21 ","pages":"773-784"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12430247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and Safety of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Using Three-Dimensional Electroanatomic Mapping Systems in Treating Ventricular Arrhythmias: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study in Vietnam.\",\"authors\":\"Le Uyen Phuong Tran, Ngoc Dung Kieu, Cao Dat Tran, Tri-Thuc Nguyen, Van Sy Hoang, Truc Thanh Thai\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/VHRM.S549819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Advanced catheter ablation using three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping (EAM) has shown favorable outcomes in high-income countries, but real-world evidence from low- and middle-income settings is scarce. This study aimed to assess the clinical characteristics, procedural features, and outcomes of radiofrequency ablation using EAM in patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) at a tertiary cardiac center in Vietnam.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 233 patients who underwent VT and PVC ablation at Cho Ray Hospital from March 2021 to December 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with the cut-off value of 50%: reduced (LVEF < 50%, n = 39) and preserved (LVEF ≥ 50%, n = 194). Data on demographics, arrhythmia burden, ablation protocol, and follow-up outcomes were collected and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with reduced LVEF more frequently presented with ventricular tachycardia (23.1% vs 6.7%, p < 0.001), ischemic heart disease (23.1% vs 7.7%, p = 0.008), and were more likely to require irrigated catheters (46.2% vs 20.1%, p = 0.001). The PVC burden prior to ablation was significantly different between groups (36.3% ± 17.2 vs 27.8% ± 12.2, p = 0.014) and patients with reduced LVEF exhibited remarkable recovery after ablation, with LVEF improving from 33.7 ± 8.1 to 55.2 ± 9.1 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The acute ablation success rate was 100% in both groups. The procedure demonstrated high levels of safety, with a non-severe complication rate of 4.7% (n = 11) and low radiation exposure (median 16 mGy [inter-quartile range: 11-26]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Catheter ablation is highly effective and safe in treating ventricular arrhythmias across different LVEF, especially in ventricular arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy group, leading to rapid recovery of left ventricular function and reduction in arrhythmia burden. These findings provide important real-world evidence from a resource limited setting, providing multiple use of catheters and skin patches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular Health and Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"773-784\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12430247/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular Health and Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S549819\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Health and Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S549819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:采用三维电解剖定位(EAM)的先进导管消融在高收入国家显示出良好的效果,但来自低收入和中等收入国家的真实证据很少。本研究旨在评估越南三级心脏中心使用EAM射频消融术治疗室性心动过速(VT)或室性早搏(PVCs)患者的临床特征、程序特征和结果。方法:我们分析了2021年3月至2023年12月在Cho Ray医院接受VT和PVC消融的233例患者。根据左室射血分数(LVEF)以50%为临界值将患者分为降低组(LVEF < 50%, n = 39)和保留组(LVEF≥50%,n = 194)。收集并比较了人口统计学、心律失常负担、消融方案和随访结果的数据。结果:LVEF降低的患者更容易出现室性心动过速(23.1% vs 6.7%, p < 0.001),缺血性心脏病(23.1% vs 7.7%, p = 0.008),更可能需要冲洗导管(46.2% vs 20.1%, p = 0.001)。两组间消融术前的PVC负荷差异有统计学意义(36.3%±17.2 vs 27.8%±12.2,p = 0.014), LVEF降低的患者在消融术后恢复明显,LVEF从33.7±8.1改善到55.2±9.1 (p < 0.001)。两组急性消融成功率均为100%。该手术显示出高度的安全性,非严重并发症发生率为4.7% (n = 11),辐射暴露低(中位数为16 mGy[四分位数范围:11-26])。结论:导管消融治疗不同LVEF的室性心律失常是一种高效、安全的方法,尤其是室性心律失常引起的心肌病组,可快速恢复左心室功能,减轻心律失常负担。这些发现在资源有限的情况下提供了重要的现实证据,提供了导管和皮肤贴片的多种用途。
Effectiveness and Safety of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Using Three-Dimensional Electroanatomic Mapping Systems in Treating Ventricular Arrhythmias: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study in Vietnam.
Purpose: Advanced catheter ablation using three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping (EAM) has shown favorable outcomes in high-income countries, but real-world evidence from low- and middle-income settings is scarce. This study aimed to assess the clinical characteristics, procedural features, and outcomes of radiofrequency ablation using EAM in patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) at a tertiary cardiac center in Vietnam.
Methods: We analyzed 233 patients who underwent VT and PVC ablation at Cho Ray Hospital from March 2021 to December 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with the cut-off value of 50%: reduced (LVEF < 50%, n = 39) and preserved (LVEF ≥ 50%, n = 194). Data on demographics, arrhythmia burden, ablation protocol, and follow-up outcomes were collected and compared.
Results: Patients with reduced LVEF more frequently presented with ventricular tachycardia (23.1% vs 6.7%, p < 0.001), ischemic heart disease (23.1% vs 7.7%, p = 0.008), and were more likely to require irrigated catheters (46.2% vs 20.1%, p = 0.001). The PVC burden prior to ablation was significantly different between groups (36.3% ± 17.2 vs 27.8% ± 12.2, p = 0.014) and patients with reduced LVEF exhibited remarkable recovery after ablation, with LVEF improving from 33.7 ± 8.1 to 55.2 ± 9.1 (p < 0.001). The acute ablation success rate was 100% in both groups. The procedure demonstrated high levels of safety, with a non-severe complication rate of 4.7% (n = 11) and low radiation exposure (median 16 mGy [inter-quartile range: 11-26]).
Conclusion: Catheter ablation is highly effective and safe in treating ventricular arrhythmias across different LVEF, especially in ventricular arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy group, leading to rapid recovery of left ventricular function and reduction in arrhythmia burden. These findings provide important real-world evidence from a resource limited setting, providing multiple use of catheters and skin patches.
期刊介绍:
An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies on the processes involved in the maintenance of vascular health; the monitoring, prevention, and treatment of vascular disease and its sequelae; and the involvement of metabolic disorders, particularly diabetes. In addition, the journal will also seek to define drug usage in terms of ultimate uptake and acceptance by the patient and healthcare professional.