欧洲血管医学的未来——来自ESVM培训经验和职业前景调查的见解。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Giacomo Buso, Jeanne Hersant, Sanjiv Keller, Igli Kalaja, Paola Bigolin, Andrej Džupina, Thomas Gary, Vinko Boc, Marianne Brodmann, Christian Heiss, Juraj Madaric, Adriana Visonà, Lucia Mazzolai
{"title":"欧洲血管医学的未来——来自ESVM培训经验和职业前景调查的见解。","authors":"Giacomo Buso, Jeanne Hersant, Sanjiv Keller, Igli Kalaja, Paola Bigolin, Andrej Džupina, Thomas Gary, Vinko Boc, Marianne Brodmann, Christian Heiss, Juraj Madaric, Adriana Visonà, Lucia Mazzolai","doi":"10.1024/0301-1526/a001221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Vascular medicine/angiology plays a crucial role in managing vascular diseases, yet its recognition, training, and practice vary across Europe. To understand these disparities, the European Society for Vascular Medicine (ESVM) conducted a survey among young trainees to assess their attitudes and perception towards vascular medicine training. <i>Methods:</i> A cross-sectional survey was distributed among trainees and young specialists from European countries, including nations with and without vascular medicine as a recognized specialty. The survey was published on the ESVM website and shared through national vascular medicine societies. Participants provided insights into their training experiences, opinions of the specialty, and priorities for improvement. Statistical analysis compared responses based on specialty recognition. <i>Findings:</i> Among 210 respondents, 36.2% (n=76) were from countries without formal specialty recognition. Training was more structured in countries with a recognized specialty (p<.001). Multidisciplinary team meetings were deemed critical by 98.1% but were more common in countries with a recognized specialty (p=.003). Overall, 80.5% (n=169) expressed interest in training abroad. Core vascular domains were well-covered, while areas like lymphatic and microvascular diseases lacked sufficient training both in countries where the specialty was recognized and where it was not. Respondents from countries with a recognized specialty rated their training significantly higher (p=.001). Despite challenges, 85.2% (n=179) would choose the specialty again, and 90.4% (n=190) supported a unified European certification. <i>Interpretation:</i> These findings highlight the need for a harmonized training framework in Europe ensuring a shared foundational curriculum in vascular medicine while enhancing professional mobility and improving patient care across the whole spectrum of vascular diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":23528,"journal":{"name":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Future of Vascular Medicine in Europe - Insights from the ESVM Survey on Training Experiences and Career Perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Giacomo Buso, Jeanne Hersant, Sanjiv Keller, Igli Kalaja, Paola Bigolin, Andrej Džupina, Thomas Gary, Vinko Boc, Marianne Brodmann, Christian Heiss, Juraj Madaric, Adriana Visonà, Lucia Mazzolai\",\"doi\":\"10.1024/0301-1526/a001221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Vascular medicine/angiology plays a crucial role in managing vascular diseases, yet its recognition, training, and practice vary across Europe. To understand these disparities, the European Society for Vascular Medicine (ESVM) conducted a survey among young trainees to assess their attitudes and perception towards vascular medicine training. <i>Methods:</i> A cross-sectional survey was distributed among trainees and young specialists from European countries, including nations with and without vascular medicine as a recognized specialty. The survey was published on the ESVM website and shared through national vascular medicine societies. Participants provided insights into their training experiences, opinions of the specialty, and priorities for improvement. Statistical analysis compared responses based on specialty recognition. <i>Findings:</i> Among 210 respondents, 36.2% (n=76) were from countries without formal specialty recognition. Training was more structured in countries with a recognized specialty (p<.001). Multidisciplinary team meetings were deemed critical by 98.1% but were more common in countries with a recognized specialty (p=.003). Overall, 80.5% (n=169) expressed interest in training abroad. Core vascular domains were well-covered, while areas like lymphatic and microvascular diseases lacked sufficient training both in countries where the specialty was recognized and where it was not. Respondents from countries with a recognized specialty rated their training significantly higher (p=.001). Despite challenges, 85.2% (n=179) would choose the specialty again, and 90.4% (n=190) supported a unified European certification. <i>Interpretation:</i> These findings highlight the need for a harmonized training framework in Europe ensuring a shared foundational curriculum in vascular medicine while enhancing professional mobility and improving patient care across the whole spectrum of vascular diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001221\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001221","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血管医学/血管学在管理血管疾病中起着至关重要的作用,但其认识、培训和实践在欧洲各地各不相同。为了了解这些差异,欧洲血管医学学会(ESVM)在年轻学员中进行了一项调查,以评估他们对血管医学培训的态度和看法。方法:对来自欧洲国家的实习生和年轻专家进行横断面调查,包括有和没有血管医学作为公认专业的国家。该调查发表在ESVM网站上,并通过国家血管医学协会分享。参与者提供了他们的培训经验、对专业的看法和需要改进的重点。统计分析比较了基于专业识别的回答。结果:在210名受访者中,36.2% (n=76)来自没有正式专业认可的国家。在具有公认专业的国家,培训更加结构化(解释:这些发现突出了欧洲统一培训框架的必要性,以确保血管医学共享基础课程,同时增强专业流动性,改善整个血管疾病领域的患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Future of Vascular Medicine in Europe - Insights from the ESVM Survey on Training Experiences and Career Perspectives.

Background: Vascular medicine/angiology plays a crucial role in managing vascular diseases, yet its recognition, training, and practice vary across Europe. To understand these disparities, the European Society for Vascular Medicine (ESVM) conducted a survey among young trainees to assess their attitudes and perception towards vascular medicine training. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was distributed among trainees and young specialists from European countries, including nations with and without vascular medicine as a recognized specialty. The survey was published on the ESVM website and shared through national vascular medicine societies. Participants provided insights into their training experiences, opinions of the specialty, and priorities for improvement. Statistical analysis compared responses based on specialty recognition. Findings: Among 210 respondents, 36.2% (n=76) were from countries without formal specialty recognition. Training was more structured in countries with a recognized specialty (p<.001). Multidisciplinary team meetings were deemed critical by 98.1% but were more common in countries with a recognized specialty (p=.003). Overall, 80.5% (n=169) expressed interest in training abroad. Core vascular domains were well-covered, while areas like lymphatic and microvascular diseases lacked sufficient training both in countries where the specialty was recognized and where it was not. Respondents from countries with a recognized specialty rated their training significantly higher (p=.001). Despite challenges, 85.2% (n=179) would choose the specialty again, and 90.4% (n=190) supported a unified European certification. Interpretation: These findings highlight the need for a harmonized training framework in Europe ensuring a shared foundational curriculum in vascular medicine while enhancing professional mobility and improving patient care across the whole spectrum of vascular diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
61
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Vasa is the European journal of vascular medicine. It is the official organ of the German, Swiss, and Slovenian Societies of Angiology. The journal publishes original research articles, case reports and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for diseases of the arterial circulation, in the field of phlebology and lymphology including the microcirculation, except the cardiac circulation. Vasa combines basic science with clinical medicine making it relevant to all physicians interested in the whole vascular field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信