静脉动脉体外膜氧合患者的早期活动:范围回顾。

IF 2.8 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Vasiliki Kanellou, Konstantinos Kaliarntas, Despoina Myrto Dounavi, Irini Patsaki, Dimitrios Kalpaxis, Christos Kourek, Stavros Dimopoulos
{"title":"静脉动脉体外膜氧合患者的早期活动:范围回顾。","authors":"Vasiliki Kanellou, Konstantinos Kaliarntas, Despoina Myrto Dounavi, Irini Patsaki, Dimitrios Kalpaxis, Christos Kourek, Stavros Dimopoulos","doi":"10.4330/wjc.v17.i8.107811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is mainly applied to patients with significant cardiorespiratory failure who do not respond to existing conventional treatments. Patients that are supported with veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) are considered very-high risk patients to participate in any type of physical therapy (PT) or mobilization. However, cumulative evidence suggests that early mobilization of critically ill patients is feasible, safe, and efficient under certain circumstances.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To summarize the existing evidence on the impact of early mobilization and physiotherapy on VA-ECMO patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a scoping review that used systematic electronic literature searches (from inception until January 2025) on MEDLINE (PubMed), PEDro, DynaMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Science direct and Hellenic Academic Libraries. Snowball searching method was also applied. Eligible studies included those reporting patients on VA-ECMO who participated in early mobilization or PT, published in English and utilized any primary evidence study design. Studies on children, animals and patients placed on any other ECMO, secondary evidence, and 'grey' literature were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 316 articles were retrieved and 13 were included in the study. Of those, 1 study was a randomized control trial, 4 retrospective studies, 4 retrospective cohort studies, 1 case series and 3 case reports. The sample size of the included studies ranged from 1 to 104 VA-ECMO patients, who were ambulated or received PT interventions, and mobilization frequency ranged from 2 per day to 4 per week. Mobilization of VA-ECMO patients seems to be safe regardless the cannula's position. PT and early mobilization were associated with better weaning from mechanical ventilation, gradual reduction of inotropes and functional capacity improvement after ECMO discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early mobilization in VA-ECMO seems to be safe and can potentially help reduce vasoconstrictors and speed up rehabilitation times. High quality research on early mobilization in VA-ECMO patients is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":23800,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Cardiology","volume":"17 8","pages":"107811"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12426996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early mobilization in patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Vasiliki Kanellou, Konstantinos Kaliarntas, Despoina Myrto Dounavi, Irini Patsaki, Dimitrios Kalpaxis, Christos Kourek, Stavros Dimopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.4330/wjc.v17.i8.107811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is mainly applied to patients with significant cardiorespiratory failure who do not respond to existing conventional treatments. Patients that are supported with veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) are considered very-high risk patients to participate in any type of physical therapy (PT) or mobilization. However, cumulative evidence suggests that early mobilization of critically ill patients is feasible, safe, and efficient under certain circumstances.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To summarize the existing evidence on the impact of early mobilization and physiotherapy on VA-ECMO patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a scoping review that used systematic electronic literature searches (from inception until January 2025) on MEDLINE (PubMed), PEDro, DynaMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Science direct and Hellenic Academic Libraries. Snowball searching method was also applied. Eligible studies included those reporting patients on VA-ECMO who participated in early mobilization or PT, published in English and utilized any primary evidence study design. Studies on children, animals and patients placed on any other ECMO, secondary evidence, and 'grey' literature were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 316 articles were retrieved and 13 were included in the study. Of those, 1 study was a randomized control trial, 4 retrospective studies, 4 retrospective cohort studies, 1 case series and 3 case reports. The sample size of the included studies ranged from 1 to 104 VA-ECMO patients, who were ambulated or received PT interventions, and mobilization frequency ranged from 2 per day to 4 per week. Mobilization of VA-ECMO patients seems to be safe regardless the cannula's position. PT and early mobilization were associated with better weaning from mechanical ventilation, gradual reduction of inotropes and functional capacity improvement after ECMO discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early mobilization in VA-ECMO seems to be safe and can potentially help reduce vasoconstrictors and speed up rehabilitation times. High quality research on early mobilization in VA-ECMO patients is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"17 8\",\"pages\":\"107811\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12426996/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v17.i8.107811\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v17.i8.107811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:体外膜氧合(Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ECMO)主要应用于对现有常规治疗无效的严重心肺衰竭患者。静脉-动脉ECMO (VA-ECMO)支持的患者被认为是参与任何类型的物理治疗(PT)或动员的非常高风险的患者。然而,累积证据表明,在某些情况下,早期动员危重患者是可行的、安全的和有效的。目的:总结早期活动和物理治疗对VA-ECMO患者影响的现有证据。方法:这是一项范围综述,使用MEDLINE (PubMed)、PEDro、DynaMed、CINAHL、Scopus、Science direct和Hellenic Academic Libraries的系统电子文献检索(从成立到2025年1月)。雪球搜索法也被应用。符合条件的研究包括那些参与早期动员或PT的VA-ECMO患者,以英文发表,并采用任何主要证据研究设计。排除了儿童、动物和其他ECMO患者的研究、次要证据和“灰色”文献。结果:共检索到316篇文献,13篇被纳入研究。其中1项为随机对照试验,4项为回顾性研究,4项为回顾性队列研究,1项为病例系列研究,3项为病例报告。纳入研究的样本量范围为1 - 104例VA-ECMO患者,他们可以走动或接受PT干预,活动频率范围为每天2次至每周4次。VA-ECMO患者的动员似乎是安全的,无论套管的位置如何。PT和早期活动与更好地脱离机械通气、逐渐减少肌力和ECMO出院后功能能力改善有关。结论:VA-ECMO早期活动似乎是安全的,可能有助于减少血管收缩物,加快康复时间。对VA-ECMO患者早期活动的高质量研究是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Early mobilization in patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A scoping review.

Early mobilization in patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A scoping review.

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is mainly applied to patients with significant cardiorespiratory failure who do not respond to existing conventional treatments. Patients that are supported with veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) are considered very-high risk patients to participate in any type of physical therapy (PT) or mobilization. However, cumulative evidence suggests that early mobilization of critically ill patients is feasible, safe, and efficient under certain circumstances.

Aim: To summarize the existing evidence on the impact of early mobilization and physiotherapy on VA-ECMO patients.

Methods: This is a scoping review that used systematic electronic literature searches (from inception until January 2025) on MEDLINE (PubMed), PEDro, DynaMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Science direct and Hellenic Academic Libraries. Snowball searching method was also applied. Eligible studies included those reporting patients on VA-ECMO who participated in early mobilization or PT, published in English and utilized any primary evidence study design. Studies on children, animals and patients placed on any other ECMO, secondary evidence, and 'grey' literature were excluded.

Results: A total of 316 articles were retrieved and 13 were included in the study. Of those, 1 study was a randomized control trial, 4 retrospective studies, 4 retrospective cohort studies, 1 case series and 3 case reports. The sample size of the included studies ranged from 1 to 104 VA-ECMO patients, who were ambulated or received PT interventions, and mobilization frequency ranged from 2 per day to 4 per week. Mobilization of VA-ECMO patients seems to be safe regardless the cannula's position. PT and early mobilization were associated with better weaning from mechanical ventilation, gradual reduction of inotropes and functional capacity improvement after ECMO discharge.

Conclusion: Early mobilization in VA-ECMO seems to be safe and can potentially help reduce vasoconstrictors and speed up rehabilitation times. High quality research on early mobilization in VA-ECMO patients is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Cardiology
World Journal of Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信