{"title":"急腹症胃肠外科的医患沟通特点及优化路径探索。","authors":"Lun Yang, Qi Zhang, Dong-Hao Wang, Qing Zhou","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.106245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastrointestinal surgical acute abdomen conditions. These conditions not only cause significant suffering to patients but also increase psychological stress for both patients and their families.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate communication characteristics in gastrointestinal surgical acute abdomen cases (such as appendicitis and pancreatitis) and explore optimization pathways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-two patients with gastrointestinal surgical acute abdomen (including appendicitis and pancreatitis) admitted to the hospital between November 2022 and June 2024 were selected. Physician-patient communication characteristics were analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (41 each) using a random draw method. The control group received conventional physician-patient communication. The observation group received an optimized communication model based on the conventional method. The two groups were compared for treatment efficacy and outcomes, psychological status, coping strategies, sleep quality, and compliance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of time to ambulation and duration of hospital stay (<i>P</i> < 0.05), whereas hospitalization costs were not significantly different (<i>P</i> > 0.05). After the intervention, the psychological status scale scores in both groups decreased significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.05), with significant differences between the groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Following the intervention, the facing subscale scores of the medical coping questionnaire increased, while the avoidance and submission subscale scores decreased (<i>P</i> < 0.05), with significant differences between the groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The observation group had lower scores on the sleep quality scale (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The compliance rate was higher in the observation group (97.56% <i>vs</i> 80.49%, <i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physician-patient communication presented contradictions between professionalism and laymen's expression and rigid communication methods. Optimizing communication models can improve sleep quality, coping strategies, patient compliance, and treatment outcomes and reduce negative emotions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 8","pages":"106245"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12427048/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of doctor-patient communication characteristics and optimization path for gastrointestinal surgery of acute abdomen.\",\"authors\":\"Lun Yang, Qi Zhang, Dong-Hao Wang, Qing Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.106245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastrointestinal surgical acute abdomen conditions. These conditions not only cause significant suffering to patients but also increase psychological stress for both patients and their families.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate communication characteristics in gastrointestinal surgical acute abdomen cases (such as appendicitis and pancreatitis) and explore optimization pathways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-two patients with gastrointestinal surgical acute abdomen (including appendicitis and pancreatitis) admitted to the hospital between November 2022 and June 2024 were selected. Physician-patient communication characteristics were analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (41 each) using a random draw method. The control group received conventional physician-patient communication. The observation group received an optimized communication model based on the conventional method. The two groups were compared for treatment efficacy and outcomes, psychological status, coping strategies, sleep quality, and compliance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of time to ambulation and duration of hospital stay (<i>P</i> < 0.05), whereas hospitalization costs were not significantly different (<i>P</i> > 0.05). After the intervention, the psychological status scale scores in both groups decreased significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.05), with significant differences between the groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Following the intervention, the facing subscale scores of the medical coping questionnaire increased, while the avoidance and submission subscale scores decreased (<i>P</i> < 0.05), with significant differences between the groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The observation group had lower scores on the sleep quality scale (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The compliance rate was higher in the observation group (97.56% <i>vs</i> 80.49%, <i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physician-patient communication presented contradictions between professionalism and laymen's expression and rigid communication methods. Optimizing communication models can improve sleep quality, coping strategies, patient compliance, and treatment outcomes and reduce negative emotions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"17 8\",\"pages\":\"106245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12427048/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.106245\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.106245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:胃肠外科急腹症。这些情况不仅给患者带来巨大的痛苦,而且也增加了患者及其家属的心理压力。目的:探讨胃肠外科急腹症(如阑尾炎、胰腺炎)患者的沟通特点,探讨优化途径。方法:选择2022年11月至2024年6月住院的胃肠外科急腹症(包括阑尾炎和胰腺炎)患者82例。分析医患沟通特征。采用随机抽取法将患者随机分为两组(每组41例)。对照组接受常规的医患沟通。观察组在常规方法的基础上优化通信模型。比较两组患者的治疗效果、心理状态、应对策略、睡眠质量和依从性。结果:两组患者活动时间、住院时间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),住院费用差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。干预后,两组患者心理状态量表得分均显著降低(P < 0.05),组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。干预后,医疗应对问卷面对分量表得分升高,回避和服从分量表得分降低(P < 0.05),组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。观察组睡眠质量评分低于对照组(P < 0.05)。观察组治疗依从率高于对照组(97.56% vs 80.49%, P < 0.05)。结论:医患沟通存在专业性与外行表达、沟通方式僵化的矛盾。优化沟通模式可以改善睡眠质量、应对策略、患者依从性和治疗效果,减少负面情绪。
Exploration of doctor-patient communication characteristics and optimization path for gastrointestinal surgery of acute abdomen.
Background: Gastrointestinal surgical acute abdomen conditions. These conditions not only cause significant suffering to patients but also increase psychological stress for both patients and their families.
Aim: To investigate communication characteristics in gastrointestinal surgical acute abdomen cases (such as appendicitis and pancreatitis) and explore optimization pathways.
Methods: Eighty-two patients with gastrointestinal surgical acute abdomen (including appendicitis and pancreatitis) admitted to the hospital between November 2022 and June 2024 were selected. Physician-patient communication characteristics were analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (41 each) using a random draw method. The control group received conventional physician-patient communication. The observation group received an optimized communication model based on the conventional method. The two groups were compared for treatment efficacy and outcomes, psychological status, coping strategies, sleep quality, and compliance.
Results: Significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of time to ambulation and duration of hospital stay (P < 0.05), whereas hospitalization costs were not significantly different (P > 0.05). After the intervention, the psychological status scale scores in both groups decreased significantly (P < 0.05), with significant differences between the groups (P < 0.05). Following the intervention, the facing subscale scores of the medical coping questionnaire increased, while the avoidance and submission subscale scores decreased (P < 0.05), with significant differences between the groups (P < 0.05). The observation group had lower scores on the sleep quality scale (P < 0.05). The compliance rate was higher in the observation group (97.56% vs 80.49%, P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Physician-patient communication presented contradictions between professionalism and laymen's expression and rigid communication methods. Optimizing communication models can improve sleep quality, coping strategies, patient compliance, and treatment outcomes and reduce negative emotions.