对经验的开放性和创新的工作行为:职场政治会损害那些开放性低的人的创新性。

IF 1.1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Current Issues in Personality Psychology Pub Date : 2025-03-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5114/cipp/197258
Eleni M Stergiopoulou, James A Meurs
{"title":"对经验的开放性和创新的工作行为:职场政治会损害那些开放性低的人的创新性。","authors":"Eleni M Stergiopoulou, James A Meurs","doi":"10.5114/cipp/197258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Work innovation is essential to both employee and organizational success in today's highly competitive work environment. Although scholars have found personality (e.g., openness to experience) to relate to innovative work behavior, only some research has examined how context might influence personality's effects, and very few studies have examined work environments (e.g., workplace politics) that could be detrimental to innovative behavior.</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>Taking a trait activation approach, across two time points, we examined how openness affects the perceptions of organizational politics (POP)-innovative work behavior relationship using a sample of employees and supervisors working in a variety of finance sectors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that innovative work behaviors, as rated by managers both concurrently and six months later, decrease for employees low on openness under conditions of elevated POP, but are not reduced for those high on openness under high POP. Thus, the (only) employees whose innovative behavior was negatively affected were those who were otherwise least prone to engage in work innovation (i.e., those low on openness), indicating the harmful effect of workplace politics on this valuable work behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that scholars should develop a more nuanced understanding of openness's long-established relationship with innovation at work, paying particular attention to the context of their openness studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":43067,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","volume":"13 3","pages":"158-166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12427001/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Openness to experience and innovative work behavior: workplace politics harms the innovativeness of those low on openness.\",\"authors\":\"Eleni M Stergiopoulou, James A Meurs\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/cipp/197258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Work innovation is essential to both employee and organizational success in today's highly competitive work environment. Although scholars have found personality (e.g., openness to experience) to relate to innovative work behavior, only some research has examined how context might influence personality's effects, and very few studies have examined work environments (e.g., workplace politics) that could be detrimental to innovative behavior.</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>Taking a trait activation approach, across two time points, we examined how openness affects the perceptions of organizational politics (POP)-innovative work behavior relationship using a sample of employees and supervisors working in a variety of finance sectors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that innovative work behaviors, as rated by managers both concurrently and six months later, decrease for employees low on openness under conditions of elevated POP, but are not reduced for those high on openness under high POP. Thus, the (only) employees whose innovative behavior was negatively affected were those who were otherwise least prone to engage in work innovation (i.e., those low on openness), indicating the harmful effect of workplace politics on this valuable work behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that scholars should develop a more nuanced understanding of openness's long-established relationship with innovation at work, paying particular attention to the context of their openness studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Issues in Personality Psychology\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"158-166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12427001/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Issues in Personality Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp/197258\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp/197258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在当今竞争激烈的工作环境中,工作创新对员工和组织的成功都至关重要。虽然学者们已经发现个性(例如,对经验的开放性)与创新工作行为有关,但只有一些研究考察了环境如何影响个性的影响,很少有研究考察了可能对创新行为有害的工作环境(例如,工作场所政治)。参与者和程序:我们采用特质激活方法,跨越两个时间点,以不同金融部门的员工和主管为样本,研究了开放性如何影响组织政治(POP)-创新工作行为关系的感知。结果:结果显示,创新工作的行为,被经理同时和六个月后,减少员工对开放条件下高流行低,但不减少对那些高在开放高流行。因此,(唯一)创新行为受到负面影响的员工是那些在其他方面最不倾向于从事工作创新的员工(即开放性低的员工),这表明职场政治对这种有价值的工作行为的有害影响。结论:这些发现表明,学者们应该对开放性与工作创新之间长期存在的关系有更细致的理解,尤其要注意开放性研究的背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Openness to experience and innovative work behavior: workplace politics harms the innovativeness of those low on openness.

Openness to experience and innovative work behavior: workplace politics harms the innovativeness of those low on openness.

Background: Work innovation is essential to both employee and organizational success in today's highly competitive work environment. Although scholars have found personality (e.g., openness to experience) to relate to innovative work behavior, only some research has examined how context might influence personality's effects, and very few studies have examined work environments (e.g., workplace politics) that could be detrimental to innovative behavior.

Participants and procedure: Taking a trait activation approach, across two time points, we examined how openness affects the perceptions of organizational politics (POP)-innovative work behavior relationship using a sample of employees and supervisors working in a variety of finance sectors.

Results: The results revealed that innovative work behaviors, as rated by managers both concurrently and six months later, decrease for employees low on openness under conditions of elevated POP, but are not reduced for those high on openness under high POP. Thus, the (only) employees whose innovative behavior was negatively affected were those who were otherwise least prone to engage in work innovation (i.e., those low on openness), indicating the harmful effect of workplace politics on this valuable work behavior.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that scholars should develop a more nuanced understanding of openness's long-established relationship with innovation at work, paying particular attention to the context of their openness studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信