Han Yan, Yu Shuang Chen, Yi Li, Guan-Xing Wei, Fang Ma, Qiu Lan Hu, Lan Ding, Wei Wei, Yan Li, Yang-Juan Bai
{"title":"永久性心脏起搏器植入后的家庭自我管理：患者应该知道什么。","authors":"Han Yan, Yu Shuang Chen, Yi Li, Guan-Xing Wei, Fang Ma, Qiu Lan Hu, Lan Ding, Wei Wei, Yan Li, Yang-Juan Bai","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S535177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to systematically explore and summarize the best evidence of home-based self-management in patients with permanent pacemaker implantation, providing comprehensive references and guidance for improving the self-management ability of such patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the \"6S\" model, a systematic literature search was conducted on home-based self-management in patients with permanent pacemaker implantation. The types of literature included best practice, clinical decision-making, guidelines, expert consensus, systematic review and evidence summary. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two researchers screened the literature, evaluated the quality, extracted the data, synthesized the evidence.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>BMJ Best Practice, Up To Date, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), the World Health Organization (WHO), the Guidelines International Network (GIN), the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO), the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Medlive, CNKI Database, SinoMed (China Biomedical Literature Database), Wanfang Database and VIP Database. The retrieval period spanned from the establishment of these databases until January 31, 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 articles were included, 1 best practice, 9 clinical decision-making, 5 guidelines, 3 expert consensus, 1 systematic review, and 2 evidence summaries. Thirty-five pieces of the best evidence from 7 aspects were summarized, including complication management, electromagnetic interference management, sports rehabilitation management, operative limb management, postoperative follow-up management, role management, and emotional management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review comprehensively summarized the best evidence home-based self-management in patients with permanent pacemaker implantation. These findings are scientific and referential, and provide evidence-based support for nursing and management of patients during home-based rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"2771-2786"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12430239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Home-Based Self-Management After Permanent Pacemaker Implantation: What Should Patients Know.\",\"authors\":\"Han Yan, Yu Shuang Chen, Yi Li, Guan-Xing Wei, Fang Ma, Qiu Lan Hu, Lan Ding, Wei Wei, Yan Li, Yang-Juan Bai\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PPA.S535177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to systematically explore and summarize the best evidence of home-based self-management in patients with permanent pacemaker implantation, providing comprehensive references and guidance for improving the self-management ability of such patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the \\\"6S\\\" model, a systematic literature search was conducted on home-based self-management in patients with permanent pacemaker implantation. The types of literature included best practice, clinical decision-making, guidelines, expert consensus, systematic review and evidence summary. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two researchers screened the literature, evaluated the quality, extracted the data, synthesized the evidence.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>BMJ Best Practice, Up To Date, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), the World Health Organization (WHO), the Guidelines International Network (GIN), the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO), the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Medlive, CNKI Database, SinoMed (China Biomedical Literature Database), Wanfang Database and VIP Database. The retrieval period spanned from the establishment of these databases until January 31, 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 articles were included, 1 best practice, 9 clinical decision-making, 5 guidelines, 3 expert consensus, 1 systematic review, and 2 evidence summaries. Thirty-five pieces of the best evidence from 7 aspects were summarized, including complication management, electromagnetic interference management, sports rehabilitation management, operative limb management, postoperative follow-up management, role management, and emotional management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review comprehensively summarized the best evidence home-based self-management in patients with permanent pacemaker implantation. These findings are scientific and referential, and provide evidence-based support for nursing and management of patients during home-based rehabilitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"2771-2786\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12430239/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S535177\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S535177","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的：本研究旨在系统探索和总结永久性起搏器植入术患者居家自我管理的最佳证据，为提高永久性起搏器植入术患者的自我管理能力提供全面的参考和指导。方法：采用“6S”模型，对永久性起搏器植入患者的居家自我管理进行系统的文献检索。文献类型包括最佳实践、临床决策、指南、专家共识、系统评价和证据总结。两位研究者根据纳入和排除标准对文献进行筛选，评价质量，提取资料，综合证据。数据来源:最新BMJ最佳实践、乔安娜布里格斯研究所（JBI）、世界卫生组织（WHO）、指南国际网络（GIN）、国家健康与护理卓越研究所（NICE）、安大略省注册护士协会（RNAO）、苏格兰校际指南网络（SIGN）、美国心脏协会（AHA）、Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science、Medlive、中国知网数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、万方数据库和VIP数据库。检索期从建立这些数据库到2025年1月31日。结果：共纳入文献21篇，最佳实践1篇，临床决策9篇，指南5篇，专家共识3篇，系统评价1篇，证据总结2篇。总结并发症管理、电磁干扰管理、运动康复管理、手术肢体管理、术后随访管理、角色管理、情绪管理等7个方面35条最佳证据。结论：本文综述了永久性起搏器植入患者居家自我管理的最佳证据。研究结果具有一定的科学性和可参考性，可为居家康复患者的护理和管理提供循证支持。
Home-Based Self-Management After Permanent Pacemaker Implantation: What Should Patients Know.
Objective: The purpose of this study is to systematically explore and summarize the best evidence of home-based self-management in patients with permanent pacemaker implantation, providing comprehensive references and guidance for improving the self-management ability of such patients.
Methods: Using the "6S" model, a systematic literature search was conducted on home-based self-management in patients with permanent pacemaker implantation. The types of literature included best practice, clinical decision-making, guidelines, expert consensus, systematic review and evidence summary. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two researchers screened the literature, evaluated the quality, extracted the data, synthesized the evidence.
Data sources: BMJ Best Practice, Up To Date, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), the World Health Organization (WHO), the Guidelines International Network (GIN), the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO), the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Medlive, CNKI Database, SinoMed (China Biomedical Literature Database), Wanfang Database and VIP Database. The retrieval period spanned from the establishment of these databases until January 31, 2025.
Results: A total of 21 articles were included, 1 best practice, 9 clinical decision-making, 5 guidelines, 3 expert consensus, 1 systematic review, and 2 evidence summaries. Thirty-five pieces of the best evidence from 7 aspects were summarized, including complication management, electromagnetic interference management, sports rehabilitation management, operative limb management, postoperative follow-up management, role management, and emotional management.
Conclusion: This review comprehensively summarized the best evidence home-based self-management in patients with permanent pacemaker implantation. These findings are scientific and referential, and provide evidence-based support for nursing and management of patients during home-based rehabilitation.
期刊介绍：
Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal.
As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
