诱导化疗结束时儿童颅内外恶性生殖细胞瘤的疗效:一份来自儿童肿瘤组的报告。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Adriana Fonseca, Doojduen Villaluna, Mark Krailo, Thomas A Olson, Farzana Pashankar, Marcio H Malogolowkin, James F Amatruda, Deborah F Billmire, Frederick J Rescorla, Jonathan H Ross, Bryan J Dicken, Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, Lindsay Frazier, Furqan Shaikh
{"title":"诱导化疗结束时儿童颅内外恶性生殖细胞瘤的疗效:一份来自儿童肿瘤组的报告。","authors":"Adriana Fonseca, Doojduen Villaluna, Mark Krailo, Thomas A Olson, Farzana Pashankar, Marcio H Malogolowkin, James F Amatruda, Deborah F Billmire, Frederick J Rescorla, Jonathan H Ross, Bryan J Dicken, Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, Lindsay Frazier, Furqan Shaikh","doi":"10.1002/pbc.32033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In many pediatric malignant germ cell tumor (MGCT) protocols, patients who do not achieve a complete response (CR; normal tumor markers, no radiological/histological residual) after three cisplatin-etoposide-bleomycin (PEb) cycles receive two to three \"consolidation\" cycles of the same regimen. Evidence for this practice is limited, and historical outcomes for non‑CR patients remain poor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with intermediate-risk MGCT, enrolled in AGCT0132, between 2003 and 2011. All patients received three cycles of PEb and underwent response assessment at the end of induction. Patients not in CR were prescribed three additional cycles of PEb as consolidation. We compared event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients who did and did not receive consolidation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 210 patients enrolled, two patients were excluded from analyses: one without complete information, and one had rapid progressive disease (PD) and did not complete induction therapy. Out of 208 patients, 193 had a CR after three cycles of induction chemotherapy, and their post-induction 4-year EFS and OS were 93% and 99%. Fifteen patients were not in CR at the end of the first three cycles. Twelve received consolidated chemotherapy as mandated per protocol, and their 4-year EFS and OS were 61% and 65%, respectively. Three patients were deemed to have progressive disease at the end of induction and received second-line therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Children with MGCTs who did not achieve CR after the first three cycles of chemotherapy had an inferior outcome compared to those with a CR, despite receiving additional cycles of PEb chemotherapy. We conclude that consolidation is of unclear benefit. We suggest that pediatric MGCT patients who fail to achieve a CR after standard induction chemotherapy may receive a salvage regimen with different agents rather than consolidation with more of the same chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19822,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Blood & Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"e32033"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of Children With Intermediate-Risk Extracranial Malignant Germ Cell Tumors by Response Status at the End of Induction Chemotherapy: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group.\",\"authors\":\"Adriana Fonseca, Doojduen Villaluna, Mark Krailo, Thomas A Olson, Farzana Pashankar, Marcio H Malogolowkin, James F Amatruda, Deborah F Billmire, Frederick J Rescorla, Jonathan H Ross, Bryan J Dicken, Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, Lindsay Frazier, Furqan Shaikh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pbc.32033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In many pediatric malignant germ cell tumor (MGCT) protocols, patients who do not achieve a complete response (CR; normal tumor markers, no radiological/histological residual) after three cisplatin-etoposide-bleomycin (PEb) cycles receive two to three \\\"consolidation\\\" cycles of the same regimen. Evidence for this practice is limited, and historical outcomes for non‑CR patients remain poor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with intermediate-risk MGCT, enrolled in AGCT0132, between 2003 and 2011. All patients received three cycles of PEb and underwent response assessment at the end of induction. Patients not in CR were prescribed three additional cycles of PEb as consolidation. We compared event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients who did and did not receive consolidation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 210 patients enrolled, two patients were excluded from analyses: one without complete information, and one had rapid progressive disease (PD) and did not complete induction therapy. Out of 208 patients, 193 had a CR after three cycles of induction chemotherapy, and their post-induction 4-year EFS and OS were 93% and 99%. Fifteen patients were not in CR at the end of the first three cycles. Twelve received consolidated chemotherapy as mandated per protocol, and their 4-year EFS and OS were 61% and 65%, respectively. Three patients were deemed to have progressive disease at the end of induction and received second-line therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Children with MGCTs who did not achieve CR after the first three cycles of chemotherapy had an inferior outcome compared to those with a CR, despite receiving additional cycles of PEb chemotherapy. We conclude that consolidation is of unclear benefit. We suggest that pediatric MGCT patients who fail to achieve a CR after standard induction chemotherapy may receive a salvage regimen with different agents rather than consolidation with more of the same chemotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Blood & Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e32033\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Blood & Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.32033\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Blood & Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.32033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在许多儿童恶性生殖细胞肿瘤(MGCT)方案中,在三个顺铂-依托泊苷-博莱霉素(PEb)周期后未达到完全缓解(CR;肿瘤标志物正常,无放射学/组织学残留)的患者接受两到三个相同方案的“巩固”周期。这种做法的证据有限,非CR患者的历史预后仍然很差。方法:我们回顾性分析了2003年至2011年AGCT0132中诊断为中危性MGCT的患者。所有患者均接受3个周期的PEb治疗,并在诱导结束时进行疗效评估。未发生CR的患者被额外开了三个周期的PEb作为巩固。我们比较了接受和未接受巩固治疗的患者的无事件生存期(EFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果:在210例入组患者中,2例患者被排除在分析之外:1例患者信息不完整,1例患者患有快速进行性疾病(PD),未完成诱导治疗。208例患者中,193例患者在诱导化疗3个周期后出现CR,诱导后4年EFS和OS分别为93%和99%。15例患者在前三个周期结束时未出现CR。12例患者按照方案要求接受联合化疗,4年的EFS和OS分别为61%和65%。3例患者在诱导结束时被认为病情进展,并接受了二线治疗。结论:尽管接受了额外的PEb化疗周期,但在前三个化疗周期后未达到CR的mgct患儿的预后较CR患儿差。我们的结论是,合并的好处并不明确。我们建议,在标准诱导化疗后未能达到CR的儿童MGCT患者可以接受不同药物的挽救方案,而不是用更多相同的化疗巩固。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcome of Children With Intermediate-Risk Extracranial Malignant Germ Cell Tumors by Response Status at the End of Induction Chemotherapy: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group.

Background: In many pediatric malignant germ cell tumor (MGCT) protocols, patients who do not achieve a complete response (CR; normal tumor markers, no radiological/histological residual) after three cisplatin-etoposide-bleomycin (PEb) cycles receive two to three "consolidation" cycles of the same regimen. Evidence for this practice is limited, and historical outcomes for non‑CR patients remain poor.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with intermediate-risk MGCT, enrolled in AGCT0132, between 2003 and 2011. All patients received three cycles of PEb and underwent response assessment at the end of induction. Patients not in CR were prescribed three additional cycles of PEb as consolidation. We compared event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients who did and did not receive consolidation.

Results: Among 210 patients enrolled, two patients were excluded from analyses: one without complete information, and one had rapid progressive disease (PD) and did not complete induction therapy. Out of 208 patients, 193 had a CR after three cycles of induction chemotherapy, and their post-induction 4-year EFS and OS were 93% and 99%. Fifteen patients were not in CR at the end of the first three cycles. Twelve received consolidated chemotherapy as mandated per protocol, and their 4-year EFS and OS were 61% and 65%, respectively. Three patients were deemed to have progressive disease at the end of induction and received second-line therapy.

Conclusion: Children with MGCTs who did not achieve CR after the first three cycles of chemotherapy had an inferior outcome compared to those with a CR, despite receiving additional cycles of PEb chemotherapy. We conclude that consolidation is of unclear benefit. We suggest that pediatric MGCT patients who fail to achieve a CR after standard induction chemotherapy may receive a salvage regimen with different agents rather than consolidation with more of the same chemotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Pediatric Blood & Cancer 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
546
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Pediatric Blood & Cancer publishes the highest quality manuscripts describing basic and clinical investigations of blood disorders and malignant diseases of childhood including diagnosis, treatment, epidemiology, etiology, biology, and molecular and clinical genetics of these diseases as they affect children, adolescents, and young adults. Pediatric Blood & Cancer will also include studies on such treatment options as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, immunology, and gene therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信