第一反应者和退伍军人创伤后应激障碍的认知加工治疗:用明确的病例表述灵活的方法。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Reginald D V Nixon, David Forbes, Tara E Galovski
{"title":"第一反应者和退伍军人创伤后应激障碍的认知加工治疗:用明确的病例表述灵活的方法。","authors":"Reginald D V Nixon, David Forbes, Tara E Galovski","doi":"10.1002/jts.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a need to improve psychological interventions for first responders and veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We conducted an open trial integrating explicit case formulation (CF) within cognitive processing therapy (CPT) in a sample primarily composed of first responders (N = 29). Participants attended weekly CPT sessions with explicit CF, where CF guided deviations (if required) from standard CPT delivery (CPT-CF). PTSD diagnosis and self-reported PTSD symptoms, depressive symptoms, and quality of life utility scores were key variables assessed at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 3-month follow-up for all participants. Of the 28 participants who started therapy, 23 completed treatment. Intent-to-treat analyses indicated significant reductions and sizeable effects at posttreatment for clinician-rated and self-reported PTSD outcomes, g = 2.48-2.50, and self-reported depressive symptoms, g = 1.37, and quality of life, g = 0.99. Effects for secondary variables ranged from small (alcohol misuse: g = 0.32) to large (sleep, g = 0.71; anger, g = 0.74; unhelpful trauma beliefs: g = 1.11). Clinical gains were maintained at 3-month follow-up. Among the 23 participants available at follow-up, 82.6% (n = 19) met good end-state functioning for PTSD, and none met the criteria for PTSD. Seven participants had moderate-to-major deviations from CPT during treatment but largely demonstrated similar outcomes to those who did not. The study replicates prior CPT-CF work among civilians, finding it to be acceptable to participants and not diluting positive outcomes of standard CPT. Future research requires randomized trials and an expansion of this approach with other trauma populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive processing therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in first responders and veterans: Flexing the approach with explicit case formulation.\",\"authors\":\"Reginald D V Nixon, David Forbes, Tara E Galovski\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jts.70005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is a need to improve psychological interventions for first responders and veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We conducted an open trial integrating explicit case formulation (CF) within cognitive processing therapy (CPT) in a sample primarily composed of first responders (N = 29). Participants attended weekly CPT sessions with explicit CF, where CF guided deviations (if required) from standard CPT delivery (CPT-CF). PTSD diagnosis and self-reported PTSD symptoms, depressive symptoms, and quality of life utility scores were key variables assessed at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 3-month follow-up for all participants. Of the 28 participants who started therapy, 23 completed treatment. Intent-to-treat analyses indicated significant reductions and sizeable effects at posttreatment for clinician-rated and self-reported PTSD outcomes, g = 2.48-2.50, and self-reported depressive symptoms, g = 1.37, and quality of life, g = 0.99. Effects for secondary variables ranged from small (alcohol misuse: g = 0.32) to large (sleep, g = 0.71; anger, g = 0.74; unhelpful trauma beliefs: g = 1.11). Clinical gains were maintained at 3-month follow-up. Among the 23 participants available at follow-up, 82.6% (n = 19) met good end-state functioning for PTSD, and none met the criteria for PTSD. Seven participants had moderate-to-major deviations from CPT during treatment but largely demonstrated similar outcomes to those who did not. The study replicates prior CPT-CF work among civilians, finding it to be acceptable to participants and not diluting positive outcomes of standard CPT. Future research requires randomized trials and an expansion of this approach with other trauma populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of traumatic stress\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of traumatic stress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.70005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of traumatic stress","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.70005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有必要改善急救人员和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)退伍军人的心理干预。我们在主要由第一反应者(N = 29)组成的样本中进行了一项将显性病例表述(CF)纳入认知加工疗法(CPT)的公开试验。参与者每周参加有明确CF的CPT会议,其中CF指导偏离标准CPT交付(CPT-CF)(如果需要)。PTSD诊断和自我报告的PTSD症状、抑郁症状和生活质量效用评分是所有参与者在治疗前、治疗后和3个月随访时评估的关键变量。在开始治疗的28名参与者中,有23人完成了治疗。意向治疗分析表明,治疗后临床评定和自我报告的PTSD结局(g = 2.48-2.50)和自我报告的抑郁症状(g = 1.37)和生活质量(g = 0.99)显著降低和显著效果。次要变量的影响从小(酒精滥用:g = 0.32)到大(睡眠,g = 0.71;愤怒,g = 0.74;无益的创伤信念:g = 1.11)不等。在3个月的随访中,临床获益保持不变。在随访的23名参与者中,82.6% (n = 19)达到良好的PTSD终态功能,没有人符合PTSD的标准。7名参与者在治疗期间有中度到重度的CPT偏差,但在很大程度上显示出与没有CPT的人相似的结果。该研究在平民中重复了先前的CPT- cf工作,发现参与者可以接受它,并且不会稀释标准CPT的积极结果。未来的研究需要随机试验,并将这种方法扩展到其他创伤人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive processing therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in first responders and veterans: Flexing the approach with explicit case formulation.

There is a need to improve psychological interventions for first responders and veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We conducted an open trial integrating explicit case formulation (CF) within cognitive processing therapy (CPT) in a sample primarily composed of first responders (N = 29). Participants attended weekly CPT sessions with explicit CF, where CF guided deviations (if required) from standard CPT delivery (CPT-CF). PTSD diagnosis and self-reported PTSD symptoms, depressive symptoms, and quality of life utility scores were key variables assessed at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 3-month follow-up for all participants. Of the 28 participants who started therapy, 23 completed treatment. Intent-to-treat analyses indicated significant reductions and sizeable effects at posttreatment for clinician-rated and self-reported PTSD outcomes, g = 2.48-2.50, and self-reported depressive symptoms, g = 1.37, and quality of life, g = 0.99. Effects for secondary variables ranged from small (alcohol misuse: g = 0.32) to large (sleep, g = 0.71; anger, g = 0.74; unhelpful trauma beliefs: g = 1.11). Clinical gains were maintained at 3-month follow-up. Among the 23 participants available at follow-up, 82.6% (n = 19) met good end-state functioning for PTSD, and none met the criteria for PTSD. Seven participants had moderate-to-major deviations from CPT during treatment but largely demonstrated similar outcomes to those who did not. The study replicates prior CPT-CF work among civilians, finding it to be acceptable to participants and not diluting positive outcomes of standard CPT. Future research requires randomized trials and an expansion of this approach with other trauma populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
125
期刊介绍: Journal of Traumatic Stress (JTS) is published for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress , the official publication for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, is an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on biopsychosocial aspects of trauma. Papers focus on theoretical formulations, research, treatment, prevention education/training, and legal and policy concerns. Journal of Traumatic Stress serves as a primary reference for professionals who study and treat people exposed to highly stressful and traumatic events (directly or through their occupational roles), such as war, disaster, accident, violence or abuse (criminal or familial), hostage-taking, or life-threatening illness. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, review papers, commentaries, and, from time to time, special issues devoted to a single topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信