{"title":"超声多普勒联合超声弹性成像在检测肾移植延迟性排斥反应方面优于单纯超声多普勒或超声弹性成像。","authors":"Masume Charmi, Alisa Mohebbi, Saeed Mohammadzadeh, Ali Abbasian Ardakani, Afshin Mohammadi","doi":"10.1002/jcu.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the performance of Doppler ultrasound (US) and US elastography with their combination in detecting delayed graft rejection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cross-sectional study of 60 consecutive adult kidney transplant recipients was done. Patients with creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL and a minimum interval of 3 months from renal transplant surgery were recruited. All patients underwent both Doppler US and US elastography. A direct head-to-head comparison was made. A glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 50 was regarded as delayed graft rejection. A resistive index (RI) value ≥ 0.79 was considered abnormal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RI was more strongly correlated to age, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.414, 0.390, and 0.386, respectively, while stiffness (kPa) exhibited a stronger correlation to the time period since surgery. Using radiological findings to estimate observed eGFR showed an adjusted R<sup>2</sup> of 0.135. Doppler US alone, US elastography alone, and combined Doppler US + US elastography + clinical data, respectively, showed area under curve (AUC) values of 0.668 (95% CI = 0.535 to 0.735), 0.641 (95% CI = 0.507 to 0.761), and 0.792 (95% CI = 0.667 to 0.886) in detecting delayed graft rejection. Estimating RI using clinical and US elastography findings showed AUC of 0.811 (95% CI = 0.689 to 0.901), with sensitivity of 61.5% (95% CI = 40.6 to 79.8) and specificity of 91% (95% CI = 76.3 to 98.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Monitoring renal allografts using a combination of Doppler US and US elastography, in conjunction with clinical data, may provide additional early diagnostic and clinical advantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":15386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination of Doppler US and US Elastography is Superior to Doppler US or US Elastography Alone in Detecting Delayed Kidney Graft Rejection.\",\"authors\":\"Masume Charmi, Alisa Mohebbi, Saeed Mohammadzadeh, Ali Abbasian Ardakani, Afshin Mohammadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcu.70051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the performance of Doppler ultrasound (US) and US elastography with their combination in detecting delayed graft rejection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cross-sectional study of 60 consecutive adult kidney transplant recipients was done. Patients with creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL and a minimum interval of 3 months from renal transplant surgery were recruited. All patients underwent both Doppler US and US elastography. A direct head-to-head comparison was made. A glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 50 was regarded as delayed graft rejection. A resistive index (RI) value ≥ 0.79 was considered abnormal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RI was more strongly correlated to age, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.414, 0.390, and 0.386, respectively, while stiffness (kPa) exhibited a stronger correlation to the time period since surgery. Using radiological findings to estimate observed eGFR showed an adjusted R<sup>2</sup> of 0.135. Doppler US alone, US elastography alone, and combined Doppler US + US elastography + clinical data, respectively, showed area under curve (AUC) values of 0.668 (95% CI = 0.535 to 0.735), 0.641 (95% CI = 0.507 to 0.761), and 0.792 (95% CI = 0.667 to 0.886) in detecting delayed graft rejection. Estimating RI using clinical and US elastography findings showed AUC of 0.811 (95% CI = 0.689 to 0.901), with sensitivity of 61.5% (95% CI = 40.6 to 79.8) and specificity of 91% (95% CI = 76.3 to 98.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Monitoring renal allografts using a combination of Doppler US and US elastography, in conjunction with clinical data, may provide additional early diagnostic and clinical advantages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.70051\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.70051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较多普勒超声(US)和US弹性成像及其联合检测移植延迟性排斥反应的效果。方法:对60例连续接受肾移植的成人进行前瞻性横断面研究。患者肌酐bb0 1.5 mg/dL和肾移植手术后至少间隔3个月被招募。所有患者均行超声多普勒超声和超声弹性成像。进行了直接的正面比较。结果:RI与年龄、糖尿病、高血压相关性更强,Pearson相关系数分别为0.414、0.390、0.386,而僵硬度(kPa)与手术后时间相关性更强。使用放射学结果估计观察到的eGFR显示调整后的R2为0.135。单用多普勒超声、单用超声弹性成像、联合多普勒超声+超声弹性成像+临床资料检测延迟性排斥反应的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.668 (95% CI = 0.535 ~ 0.735)、0.641 (95% CI = 0.507 ~ 0.761)、0.792 (95% CI = 0.667 ~ 0.886)。使用临床和US弹性成像结果估计RI显示AUC为0.811 (95% CI = 0.689至0.901),敏感性为61.5% (95% CI = 40.6至79.8),特异性为91% (95% CI = 76.3至98.1)。结论:联合多普勒超声和超声弹性成像监测同种异体肾移植,结合临床资料,可能提供额外的早期诊断和临床优势。
Combination of Doppler US and US Elastography is Superior to Doppler US or US Elastography Alone in Detecting Delayed Kidney Graft Rejection.
Objectives: To compare the performance of Doppler ultrasound (US) and US elastography with their combination in detecting delayed graft rejection.
Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study of 60 consecutive adult kidney transplant recipients was done. Patients with creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL and a minimum interval of 3 months from renal transplant surgery were recruited. All patients underwent both Doppler US and US elastography. A direct head-to-head comparison was made. A glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 50 was regarded as delayed graft rejection. A resistive index (RI) value ≥ 0.79 was considered abnormal.
Results: RI was more strongly correlated to age, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.414, 0.390, and 0.386, respectively, while stiffness (kPa) exhibited a stronger correlation to the time period since surgery. Using radiological findings to estimate observed eGFR showed an adjusted R2 of 0.135. Doppler US alone, US elastography alone, and combined Doppler US + US elastography + clinical data, respectively, showed area under curve (AUC) values of 0.668 (95% CI = 0.535 to 0.735), 0.641 (95% CI = 0.507 to 0.761), and 0.792 (95% CI = 0.667 to 0.886) in detecting delayed graft rejection. Estimating RI using clinical and US elastography findings showed AUC of 0.811 (95% CI = 0.689 to 0.901), with sensitivity of 61.5% (95% CI = 40.6 to 79.8) and specificity of 91% (95% CI = 76.3 to 98.1).
Conclusion: Monitoring renal allografts using a combination of Doppler US and US elastography, in conjunction with clinical data, may provide additional early diagnostic and clinical advantages.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (JCU) is an international journal dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of scientific information on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical sonography.
The scope of the journal includes--but is not limited to--the following areas: sonography of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, vascular system, nervous system, head and neck, chest, breast, musculoskeletal system, and other superficial structures; Doppler applications; obstetric and pediatric applications; and interventional sonography. Studies comparing sonography with other imaging modalities are encouraged, as are studies evaluating the economic impact of sonography. Also within the journal''s scope are innovations and improvements in instrumentation and examination techniques and the use of contrast agents.
JCU publishes original research articles, case reports, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letters to the editor. The journal is also dedicated to being an educational resource for its readers, through the publication of review articles and various scientific contributions from members of the editorial board and other world-renowned experts in sonography.