不同纤维增强生物基对二硅酸锂覆盖层修复体断裂强度和破坏模式的影响(一项体外比较研究)。

Q2 Dentistry
Maareb Abdulraheem Nabat, Alaa Jawad Kadhim
{"title":"不同纤维增强生物基对二硅酸锂覆盖层修复体断裂强度和破坏模式的影响(一项体外比较研究)。","authors":"Maareb Abdulraheem Nabat, Alaa Jawad Kadhim","doi":"10.4317/jced.62746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ceramic restorations are commonly employed in restorative dentistry. However, their inherent brittleness poses a challenge, particularly in extensive restorations. Limited data exist regarding the fiber reinforcement's role in the efficiency of lithium disilicate overlay restorations. This research sought to evaluate the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate overlay restorations using various biobase techniques.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Fifty sound maxillary first premolars of equivalent dimensions received a full-bevel overlay preparation design with a 3-mm occlusal reduction. Samples were allocated randomly to five experimental groups (n = 10): Group A: (delayed dentin sealing); Group B: (immediate dentin sealing with Optibond FL); Group C: immediate dentin sealing was coated with a 1-mm flowable composite layer (Clearfil AP-X Flow); Group D: following immediate dentin sealing, a 1-mm short fiber reinforced composite layer (EverX Flow) was applied; and Group E: immediate dentin sealing followed by a 1-mm flowable composite layer reinforced with polyethylene Ribbond fibers. Following tooth preparation, digital impressions were made via a Medit i700 intraoral scanner, and overlays were digitally designed via Sirona inLab CAD software and milled via a 4-axis milling machine. The overlays were luted with a preheated composite. The fracture load was assessed (in Newtons) utilizing a universal testing unit. A one-way analysis of variance was employed to perform statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The one-way ANOVA test indicated no significant difference between the groups (<i>P</i>> 0.05). Nevertheless, the fiber-reinforced biobases in Groups D and E exhibited less catastrophic failure modes than those in Groups A, B, and C.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All of the tested overlay restorations displayed sufficient strength to endure the normal masticatory force. The incorporation of fiber-reinforced biobases positively influenced the failure mode. <b>Key words:</b>Biobase, Ever X flow, Full bevel, Overlay, Ribbond fiber.</p>","PeriodicalId":15376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","volume":"17 8","pages":"e884-e890"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12424585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influences of different fiber-reinforced biobases on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate overlay restorations (a comparative <i>in vitro</i> study).\",\"authors\":\"Maareb Abdulraheem Nabat, Alaa Jawad Kadhim\",\"doi\":\"10.4317/jced.62746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ceramic restorations are commonly employed in restorative dentistry. However, their inherent brittleness poses a challenge, particularly in extensive restorations. Limited data exist regarding the fiber reinforcement's role in the efficiency of lithium disilicate overlay restorations. This research sought to evaluate the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate overlay restorations using various biobase techniques.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Fifty sound maxillary first premolars of equivalent dimensions received a full-bevel overlay preparation design with a 3-mm occlusal reduction. Samples were allocated randomly to five experimental groups (n = 10): Group A: (delayed dentin sealing); Group B: (immediate dentin sealing with Optibond FL); Group C: immediate dentin sealing was coated with a 1-mm flowable composite layer (Clearfil AP-X Flow); Group D: following immediate dentin sealing, a 1-mm short fiber reinforced composite layer (EverX Flow) was applied; and Group E: immediate dentin sealing followed by a 1-mm flowable composite layer reinforced with polyethylene Ribbond fibers. Following tooth preparation, digital impressions were made via a Medit i700 intraoral scanner, and overlays were digitally designed via Sirona inLab CAD software and milled via a 4-axis milling machine. The overlays were luted with a preheated composite. The fracture load was assessed (in Newtons) utilizing a universal testing unit. A one-way analysis of variance was employed to perform statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The one-way ANOVA test indicated no significant difference between the groups (<i>P</i>> 0.05). Nevertheless, the fiber-reinforced biobases in Groups D and E exhibited less catastrophic failure modes than those in Groups A, B, and C.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All of the tested overlay restorations displayed sufficient strength to endure the normal masticatory force. The incorporation of fiber-reinforced biobases positively influenced the failure mode. <b>Key words:</b>Biobase, Ever X flow, Full bevel, Overlay, Ribbond fiber.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"17 8\",\"pages\":\"e884-e890\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12424585/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62746\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:陶瓷修复体是牙科修复中常用的修复体。然而,它们固有的脆性带来了挑战,特别是在广泛的修复中。关于纤维增强剂在二硅酸锂复盖层修复效率中的作用的数据有限。本研究旨在利用各种生物基技术评估二硅酸锂覆盖层修复体的断裂强度和破坏模式。材料和方法:50颗同等尺寸的上颌第一前磨牙采用全斜面覆盖预备设计,咬合减少3毫米。将样品随机分为5个实验组(n = 10): A组:(延迟牙本质密封);B组:(Optibond FL即刻牙本质封闭);C组:即刻牙本质密封涂覆1 mm可流动复合层(Clearfil AP-X Flow);D组:牙本质即刻封闭后,应用1 mm短纤维增强复合材料层(EverX Flow);E组:立即封闭牙本质,然后用聚乙烯带状纤维增强1mm可流动复合层。牙齿准备后,通过Medit i700口内扫描仪进行数字印模,通过Sirona inLab CAD软件进行数字设计,并通过4轴铣床进行铣削。覆盖层是用预热的复合材料涂上去的。使用通用测试单元评估断裂载荷(牛顿)。采用单因素方差分析进行统计分析。结果:经单因素方差分析,各组间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。然而,与A、B和c组相比,D和E组纤维增强生物基的灾难性破坏模式较少。结论:所有测试的覆盖层修复体都具有足够的强度来承受正常的咀嚼力。纤维增强生物基的掺入对破坏模式有积极影响。关键词:生物基,恒X流,全斜角,覆盖,带状纤维。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Influences of different fiber-reinforced biobases on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate overlay restorations (a comparative <i>in vitro</i> study).

Influences of different fiber-reinforced biobases on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate overlay restorations (a comparative <i>in vitro</i> study).

Influences of different fiber-reinforced biobases on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate overlay restorations (a comparative <i>in vitro</i> study).

Influences of different fiber-reinforced biobases on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate overlay restorations (a comparative in vitro study).

Background: Ceramic restorations are commonly employed in restorative dentistry. However, their inherent brittleness poses a challenge, particularly in extensive restorations. Limited data exist regarding the fiber reinforcement's role in the efficiency of lithium disilicate overlay restorations. This research sought to evaluate the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate overlay restorations using various biobase techniques.

Material and methods: Fifty sound maxillary first premolars of equivalent dimensions received a full-bevel overlay preparation design with a 3-mm occlusal reduction. Samples were allocated randomly to five experimental groups (n = 10): Group A: (delayed dentin sealing); Group B: (immediate dentin sealing with Optibond FL); Group C: immediate dentin sealing was coated with a 1-mm flowable composite layer (Clearfil AP-X Flow); Group D: following immediate dentin sealing, a 1-mm short fiber reinforced composite layer (EverX Flow) was applied; and Group E: immediate dentin sealing followed by a 1-mm flowable composite layer reinforced with polyethylene Ribbond fibers. Following tooth preparation, digital impressions were made via a Medit i700 intraoral scanner, and overlays were digitally designed via Sirona inLab CAD software and milled via a 4-axis milling machine. The overlays were luted with a preheated composite. The fracture load was assessed (in Newtons) utilizing a universal testing unit. A one-way analysis of variance was employed to perform statistical analysis.

Results: The one-way ANOVA test indicated no significant difference between the groups (P> 0.05). Nevertheless, the fiber-reinforced biobases in Groups D and E exhibited less catastrophic failure modes than those in Groups A, B, and C.

Conclusions: All of the tested overlay restorations displayed sufficient strength to endure the normal masticatory force. The incorporation of fiber-reinforced biobases positively influenced the failure mode. Key words:Biobase, Ever X flow, Full bevel, Overlay, Ribbond fiber.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Indexed in PUBMED, PubMed Central® (PMC) since 2012 and SCOPUSJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is an Open Access (free access on-line) - http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm. The aim of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is: - Periodontology - Community and Preventive Dentistry - Esthetic Dentistry - Biomaterials and Bioengineering in Dentistry - Operative Dentistry and Endodontics - Prosthetic Dentistry - Orthodontics - Oral Medicine and Pathology - Odontostomatology for the disabled or special patients - Oral Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信