两种多步抛光系统对纳米复合树脂表面特性的影响:重复使用的影响。

Q2 Dentistry
Ana María Restrepo, Carlos Andrés Giraldo, Ana María Torres-López, Federico Latorre-Correa, Carlos M Ardila
{"title":"两种多步抛光系统对纳米复合树脂表面特性的影响:重复使用的影响。","authors":"Ana María Restrepo, Carlos Andrés Giraldo, Ana María Torres-López, Federico Latorre-Correa, Carlos M Ardila","doi":"10.4317/jced.62873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proper finishing and polishing are crucial for reducing surface roughness and eliminating the incompletely polymerized oxygen-inhibited layer. This study compared surface characteristics - specifically water contact angle, surface roughness, and morphology of three nanohybrid composite resins polished with two different multi-step polishing systems.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We evaluated Filtek Z250 (3M), Tetric N-Ceram (Ivoclar), and Spectra Smart (Dentsply), all in shade A2. Thirty-nine discs per resin (9 mm diameter × 2 mm thickness) were fabricated, stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours, and pre-polished with silicon carbide paper (600, 1000, and 1200 grit). Final polishing employed two systems: the 3-step Astropol system (Ivoclar) and the 2-step ShapeGuard system (Diatech), with each system tested through six reuse cycles (three samples per resin per cycle). Surface analysis included water contact angle measurement, profilometry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Astropol system demonstrated significantly greater hydrophobicity (107.6° ± 10.9°) than ShapeGuard (99.1° ± 9.0°). Among the tested resins, Filtek Z250 polished with Astropol showed the lowest surface roughness (0.27 ± 0.11 µm), while Spectra Smart polished with ShapeGuard showed the highest (0.78 ± 0.20 µm). Polishing system reuse showed no significant effects on results. SEM revealed no noTable morphological changes, and EDS confirmed consistently high SiO2 content across all resins.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both polishing system and resin composition significantly influence surface characteristics. Filtek Z250 performed optimally with both polishing systems. Further research should investigate the long-term effects of polishing system reuse. <b>Key words:</b>Nanohybrid resins, polishing systems, surface roughness, contact angle, SEM.</p>","PeriodicalId":15376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","volume":"17 8","pages":"e929-e935"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12424601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of two multi-step polishing systems on surface characteristics of nanohybrid composite resins: Influence of reuse.\",\"authors\":\"Ana María Restrepo, Carlos Andrés Giraldo, Ana María Torres-López, Federico Latorre-Correa, Carlos M Ardila\",\"doi\":\"10.4317/jced.62873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proper finishing and polishing are crucial for reducing surface roughness and eliminating the incompletely polymerized oxygen-inhibited layer. This study compared surface characteristics - specifically water contact angle, surface roughness, and morphology of three nanohybrid composite resins polished with two different multi-step polishing systems.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We evaluated Filtek Z250 (3M), Tetric N-Ceram (Ivoclar), and Spectra Smart (Dentsply), all in shade A2. Thirty-nine discs per resin (9 mm diameter × 2 mm thickness) were fabricated, stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours, and pre-polished with silicon carbide paper (600, 1000, and 1200 grit). Final polishing employed two systems: the 3-step Astropol system (Ivoclar) and the 2-step ShapeGuard system (Diatech), with each system tested through six reuse cycles (three samples per resin per cycle). Surface analysis included water contact angle measurement, profilometry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Astropol system demonstrated significantly greater hydrophobicity (107.6° ± 10.9°) than ShapeGuard (99.1° ± 9.0°). Among the tested resins, Filtek Z250 polished with Astropol showed the lowest surface roughness (0.27 ± 0.11 µm), while Spectra Smart polished with ShapeGuard showed the highest (0.78 ± 0.20 µm). Polishing system reuse showed no significant effects on results. SEM revealed no noTable morphological changes, and EDS confirmed consistently high SiO2 content across all resins.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both polishing system and resin composition significantly influence surface characteristics. Filtek Z250 performed optimally with both polishing systems. Further research should investigate the long-term effects of polishing system reuse. <b>Key words:</b>Nanohybrid resins, polishing systems, surface roughness, contact angle, SEM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"17 8\",\"pages\":\"e929-e935\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12424601/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62873\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:适当的精加工和抛光对于降低表面粗糙度和消除不完全聚合的氧抑制层至关重要。本研究比较了用两种不同的多步抛光系统抛光的三种纳米杂化复合树脂的表面特性——特别是水接触角、表面粗糙度和形貌。材料和方法:我们评估了Filtek Z250 (3M), Tetric N-Ceram (Ivoclar)和Spectra Smart (Dentsply),均在阴影A2中。每种树脂制备39个圆盘(直径9 mm ×厚度2 mm),在37℃蒸馏水中保存24小时,用碳化硅纸(600、1000和1200粒度)预抛光。最后的抛光采用了两种系统:3步Astropol系统(Ivoclar)和2步ShapeGuard系统(Diatech),每种系统经过6个重复使用循环(每个循环每个树脂三个样品)。表面分析包括水接触角测量、轮廓测量、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和能量色散x射线光谱(EDS)。结果:Astropol系统的疏水性(107.6°±10.9°)明显高于ShapeGuard(99.1°±9.0°)。在测试的树脂中,用Astropol抛光的Filtek Z250的表面粗糙度最低(0.27±0.11µm),而用ShapeGuard抛光的Spectra Smart的表面粗糙度最高(0.78±0.20µm)。抛光系统的重用对结果没有显著影响。SEM未发现明显的形态变化,EDS证实所有树脂的SiO2含量均较高。结论:抛光系统和树脂组成对表面特性有显著影响。Filtek Z250在两种抛光系统下均表现最佳。进一步的研究应该调查抛光系统重用的长期影响。关键词:纳米杂化树脂,抛光系统,表面粗糙度,接触角,扫描电镜
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of two multi-step polishing systems on surface characteristics of nanohybrid composite resins: Influence of reuse.

Background: Proper finishing and polishing are crucial for reducing surface roughness and eliminating the incompletely polymerized oxygen-inhibited layer. This study compared surface characteristics - specifically water contact angle, surface roughness, and morphology of three nanohybrid composite resins polished with two different multi-step polishing systems.

Material and methods: We evaluated Filtek Z250 (3M), Tetric N-Ceram (Ivoclar), and Spectra Smart (Dentsply), all in shade A2. Thirty-nine discs per resin (9 mm diameter × 2 mm thickness) were fabricated, stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours, and pre-polished with silicon carbide paper (600, 1000, and 1200 grit). Final polishing employed two systems: the 3-step Astropol system (Ivoclar) and the 2-step ShapeGuard system (Diatech), with each system tested through six reuse cycles (three samples per resin per cycle). Surface analysis included water contact angle measurement, profilometry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS).

Results: The Astropol system demonstrated significantly greater hydrophobicity (107.6° ± 10.9°) than ShapeGuard (99.1° ± 9.0°). Among the tested resins, Filtek Z250 polished with Astropol showed the lowest surface roughness (0.27 ± 0.11 µm), while Spectra Smart polished with ShapeGuard showed the highest (0.78 ± 0.20 µm). Polishing system reuse showed no significant effects on results. SEM revealed no noTable morphological changes, and EDS confirmed consistently high SiO2 content across all resins.

Conclusions: Both polishing system and resin composition significantly influence surface characteristics. Filtek Z250 performed optimally with both polishing systems. Further research should investigate the long-term effects of polishing system reuse. Key words:Nanohybrid resins, polishing systems, surface roughness, contact angle, SEM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Indexed in PUBMED, PubMed Central® (PMC) since 2012 and SCOPUSJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is an Open Access (free access on-line) - http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm. The aim of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is: - Periodontology - Community and Preventive Dentistry - Esthetic Dentistry - Biomaterials and Bioengineering in Dentistry - Operative Dentistry and Endodontics - Prosthetic Dentistry - Orthodontics - Oral Medicine and Pathology - Odontostomatology for the disabled or special patients - Oral Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信