疑似垂直根骨折的诊断方法和临床处理:一项基于问卷的研究。

Q2 Dentistry
Iandara de Lima Scardini, Stephanie Isabel Diaz Zamalloa, Hermano Camelo Paiva, Caroline Carvalho Santos, Marcelo Dos Santos, Celso Luiz Caldeira, Giulio Gavini
{"title":"疑似垂直根骨折的诊断方法和临床处理:一项基于问卷的研究。","authors":"Iandara de Lima Scardini, Stephanie Isabel Diaz Zamalloa, Hermano Camelo Paiva, Caroline Carvalho Santos, Marcelo Dos Santos, Celso Luiz Caldeira, Giulio Gavini","doi":"10.4317/jced.63012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosing and clinically managing vertical root fractures (VRF) present ongoing challenges for dentists. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic approaches and the clinical management employed by Brazilian dentists when confronted with suspected cases of VRF.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Online questionnaires were sent to dentists via social media and email. The questionnaire consisted of seven inquiries about the diagnosis and clinical management of suspected VRF cases. The data were evaluated descriptively and statistically using the Chi-square, Fisher's exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests (<i>p</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 517 dentists answered the questionnaire, 72.3% were Endodontists, 17.41% were general practitioners, and 10.25% were specialists in other dental fields. A narrow and deep periodontal pocket was the most frequently reported clinical sign (71.8%), while a halo-shaped radiolucency was the most common radiographic finding reported (59.3%). 85.7% of the participants reported requesting a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan to VRF suspected cases, and the combination of four complementary exams was most frequently selected by dentists (23.59%). Professional qualification influenced the number of clinical signals and of auxiliary exams reported in VRF suspected cases (<i>p</i><0.05). 91.9% of the participants reported using both the image and the CBCT report to evaluate the scan, and no association was observed between dentist qualifications and CBCT evaluation methods (<i>p</i><0.05). 308 participants indicated extraction for teeth suspected of VRF, whereas 90 suggested surgical exposure, with 79 of them being Endodontists. A significant association was observed between dentist qualifications and clinical management in suspected VRF cases (<i>p</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A variety of clinical and radiographic signals and symptoms were reported in suspected VRF cases. CBCT was the most commonly requested auxiliary exam. Professional qualification influenced the number of reported signals and symptoms, the number of auxiliary exams, and the clinical management strategies in suspected VRF cases. <b>Key words:</b>Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Endodontics, Questionnaire-based Study, Radicular Fracture, Vertical Root Fracture.</p>","PeriodicalId":15376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","volume":"17 8","pages":"e980-e988"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12424595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosis Approaches and Clinical Management of Suspected Vertical Root Fractures: A Questionnaire-Based Study.\",\"authors\":\"Iandara de Lima Scardini, Stephanie Isabel Diaz Zamalloa, Hermano Camelo Paiva, Caroline Carvalho Santos, Marcelo Dos Santos, Celso Luiz Caldeira, Giulio Gavini\",\"doi\":\"10.4317/jced.63012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosing and clinically managing vertical root fractures (VRF) present ongoing challenges for dentists. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic approaches and the clinical management employed by Brazilian dentists when confronted with suspected cases of VRF.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Online questionnaires were sent to dentists via social media and email. The questionnaire consisted of seven inquiries about the diagnosis and clinical management of suspected VRF cases. The data were evaluated descriptively and statistically using the Chi-square, Fisher's exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests (<i>p</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 517 dentists answered the questionnaire, 72.3% were Endodontists, 17.41% were general practitioners, and 10.25% were specialists in other dental fields. A narrow and deep periodontal pocket was the most frequently reported clinical sign (71.8%), while a halo-shaped radiolucency was the most common radiographic finding reported (59.3%). 85.7% of the participants reported requesting a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan to VRF suspected cases, and the combination of four complementary exams was most frequently selected by dentists (23.59%). Professional qualification influenced the number of clinical signals and of auxiliary exams reported in VRF suspected cases (<i>p</i><0.05). 91.9% of the participants reported using both the image and the CBCT report to evaluate the scan, and no association was observed between dentist qualifications and CBCT evaluation methods (<i>p</i><0.05). 308 participants indicated extraction for teeth suspected of VRF, whereas 90 suggested surgical exposure, with 79 of them being Endodontists. A significant association was observed between dentist qualifications and clinical management in suspected VRF cases (<i>p</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A variety of clinical and radiographic signals and symptoms were reported in suspected VRF cases. CBCT was the most commonly requested auxiliary exam. Professional qualification influenced the number of reported signals and symptoms, the number of auxiliary exams, and the clinical management strategies in suspected VRF cases. <b>Key words:</b>Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Endodontics, Questionnaire-based Study, Radicular Fracture, Vertical Root Fracture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"17 8\",\"pages\":\"e980-e988\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12424595/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.63012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.63012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:诊断和临床处理垂直根骨折(VRF)是牙医面临的持续挑战。本研究旨在评估巴西牙医在面对疑似VRF病例时采用的诊断方法和临床管理。材料和方法:通过社交媒体和电子邮件向牙医发送在线问卷。问卷包括7个关于疑似VRF病例的诊断和临床处理的问题。采用卡方检验、Fisher’s exact检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验对数据进行描述性和统计学评价。结果:共有517名牙医回答了问卷,其中牙髓科医生占72.3%,全科医生占17.41%,其他牙科专业医生占10.25%。窄而深的牙周袋是最常见的临床征象(71.8%),而光晕状放射透光是最常见的x线表现(59.3%)。85.7%的参与者报告要求对VRF疑似病例进行锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT),牙医最常选择四种补充检查的组合(23.59%)。专业资格影响VRF疑似病例报告的临床信号和辅助检查的数量(ppp)结论:VRF疑似病例报告的临床和影像学信号和症状多种多样。CBCT是最常被要求的辅助检查。专业资格影响报告的信号和症状的数量、辅助检查的数量以及疑似VRF病例的临床管理策略。关键词:锥形束计算机断层,牙髓学,问卷研究,根状骨折,垂直根状骨折
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Diagnosis Approaches and Clinical Management of Suspected Vertical Root Fractures: A Questionnaire-Based Study.

Diagnosis Approaches and Clinical Management of Suspected Vertical Root Fractures: A Questionnaire-Based Study.

Diagnosis Approaches and Clinical Management of Suspected Vertical Root Fractures: A Questionnaire-Based Study.

Diagnosis Approaches and Clinical Management of Suspected Vertical Root Fractures: A Questionnaire-Based Study.

Background: Diagnosing and clinically managing vertical root fractures (VRF) present ongoing challenges for dentists. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic approaches and the clinical management employed by Brazilian dentists when confronted with suspected cases of VRF.

Material and methods: Online questionnaires were sent to dentists via social media and email. The questionnaire consisted of seven inquiries about the diagnosis and clinical management of suspected VRF cases. The data were evaluated descriptively and statistically using the Chi-square, Fisher's exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p<0.05).

Results: A total of 517 dentists answered the questionnaire, 72.3% were Endodontists, 17.41% were general practitioners, and 10.25% were specialists in other dental fields. A narrow and deep periodontal pocket was the most frequently reported clinical sign (71.8%), while a halo-shaped radiolucency was the most common radiographic finding reported (59.3%). 85.7% of the participants reported requesting a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan to VRF suspected cases, and the combination of four complementary exams was most frequently selected by dentists (23.59%). Professional qualification influenced the number of clinical signals and of auxiliary exams reported in VRF suspected cases (p<0.05). 91.9% of the participants reported using both the image and the CBCT report to evaluate the scan, and no association was observed between dentist qualifications and CBCT evaluation methods (p<0.05). 308 participants indicated extraction for teeth suspected of VRF, whereas 90 suggested surgical exposure, with 79 of them being Endodontists. A significant association was observed between dentist qualifications and clinical management in suspected VRF cases (p<0.05).

Conclusions: A variety of clinical and radiographic signals and symptoms were reported in suspected VRF cases. CBCT was the most commonly requested auxiliary exam. Professional qualification influenced the number of reported signals and symptoms, the number of auxiliary exams, and the clinical management strategies in suspected VRF cases. Key words:Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Endodontics, Questionnaire-based Study, Radicular Fracture, Vertical Root Fracture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Indexed in PUBMED, PubMed Central® (PMC) since 2012 and SCOPUSJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is an Open Access (free access on-line) - http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm. The aim of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is: - Periodontology - Community and Preventive Dentistry - Esthetic Dentistry - Biomaterials and Bioengineering in Dentistry - Operative Dentistry and Endodontics - Prosthetic Dentistry - Orthodontics - Oral Medicine and Pathology - Odontostomatology for the disabled or special patients - Oral Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信