Iandara de Lima Scardini, Stephanie Isabel Diaz Zamalloa, Hermano Camelo Paiva, Caroline Carvalho Santos, Marcelo Dos Santos, Celso Luiz Caldeira, Giulio Gavini
{"title":"疑似垂直根骨折的诊断方法和临床处理:一项基于问卷的研究。","authors":"Iandara de Lima Scardini, Stephanie Isabel Diaz Zamalloa, Hermano Camelo Paiva, Caroline Carvalho Santos, Marcelo Dos Santos, Celso Luiz Caldeira, Giulio Gavini","doi":"10.4317/jced.63012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosing and clinically managing vertical root fractures (VRF) present ongoing challenges for dentists. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic approaches and the clinical management employed by Brazilian dentists when confronted with suspected cases of VRF.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Online questionnaires were sent to dentists via social media and email. The questionnaire consisted of seven inquiries about the diagnosis and clinical management of suspected VRF cases. The data were evaluated descriptively and statistically using the Chi-square, Fisher's exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests (<i>p</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 517 dentists answered the questionnaire, 72.3% were Endodontists, 17.41% were general practitioners, and 10.25% were specialists in other dental fields. A narrow and deep periodontal pocket was the most frequently reported clinical sign (71.8%), while a halo-shaped radiolucency was the most common radiographic finding reported (59.3%). 85.7% of the participants reported requesting a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan to VRF suspected cases, and the combination of four complementary exams was most frequently selected by dentists (23.59%). Professional qualification influenced the number of clinical signals and of auxiliary exams reported in VRF suspected cases (<i>p</i><0.05). 91.9% of the participants reported using both the image and the CBCT report to evaluate the scan, and no association was observed between dentist qualifications and CBCT evaluation methods (<i>p</i><0.05). 308 participants indicated extraction for teeth suspected of VRF, whereas 90 suggested surgical exposure, with 79 of them being Endodontists. A significant association was observed between dentist qualifications and clinical management in suspected VRF cases (<i>p</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A variety of clinical and radiographic signals and symptoms were reported in suspected VRF cases. CBCT was the most commonly requested auxiliary exam. Professional qualification influenced the number of reported signals and symptoms, the number of auxiliary exams, and the clinical management strategies in suspected VRF cases. <b>Key words:</b>Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Endodontics, Questionnaire-based Study, Radicular Fracture, Vertical Root Fracture.</p>","PeriodicalId":15376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","volume":"17 8","pages":"e980-e988"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12424595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosis Approaches and Clinical Management of Suspected Vertical Root Fractures: A Questionnaire-Based Study.\",\"authors\":\"Iandara de Lima Scardini, Stephanie Isabel Diaz Zamalloa, Hermano Camelo Paiva, Caroline Carvalho Santos, Marcelo Dos Santos, Celso Luiz Caldeira, Giulio Gavini\",\"doi\":\"10.4317/jced.63012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosing and clinically managing vertical root fractures (VRF) present ongoing challenges for dentists. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic approaches and the clinical management employed by Brazilian dentists when confronted with suspected cases of VRF.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Online questionnaires were sent to dentists via social media and email. The questionnaire consisted of seven inquiries about the diagnosis and clinical management of suspected VRF cases. The data were evaluated descriptively and statistically using the Chi-square, Fisher's exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests (<i>p</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 517 dentists answered the questionnaire, 72.3% were Endodontists, 17.41% were general practitioners, and 10.25% were specialists in other dental fields. A narrow and deep periodontal pocket was the most frequently reported clinical sign (71.8%), while a halo-shaped radiolucency was the most common radiographic finding reported (59.3%). 85.7% of the participants reported requesting a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan to VRF suspected cases, and the combination of four complementary exams was most frequently selected by dentists (23.59%). Professional qualification influenced the number of clinical signals and of auxiliary exams reported in VRF suspected cases (<i>p</i><0.05). 91.9% of the participants reported using both the image and the CBCT report to evaluate the scan, and no association was observed between dentist qualifications and CBCT evaluation methods (<i>p</i><0.05). 308 participants indicated extraction for teeth suspected of VRF, whereas 90 suggested surgical exposure, with 79 of them being Endodontists. A significant association was observed between dentist qualifications and clinical management in suspected VRF cases (<i>p</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A variety of clinical and radiographic signals and symptoms were reported in suspected VRF cases. CBCT was the most commonly requested auxiliary exam. Professional qualification influenced the number of reported signals and symptoms, the number of auxiliary exams, and the clinical management strategies in suspected VRF cases. <b>Key words:</b>Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Endodontics, Questionnaire-based Study, Radicular Fracture, Vertical Root Fracture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"17 8\",\"pages\":\"e980-e988\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12424595/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.63012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.63012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnosis Approaches and Clinical Management of Suspected Vertical Root Fractures: A Questionnaire-Based Study.
Background: Diagnosing and clinically managing vertical root fractures (VRF) present ongoing challenges for dentists. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic approaches and the clinical management employed by Brazilian dentists when confronted with suspected cases of VRF.
Material and methods: Online questionnaires were sent to dentists via social media and email. The questionnaire consisted of seven inquiries about the diagnosis and clinical management of suspected VRF cases. The data were evaluated descriptively and statistically using the Chi-square, Fisher's exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p<0.05).
Results: A total of 517 dentists answered the questionnaire, 72.3% were Endodontists, 17.41% were general practitioners, and 10.25% were specialists in other dental fields. A narrow and deep periodontal pocket was the most frequently reported clinical sign (71.8%), while a halo-shaped radiolucency was the most common radiographic finding reported (59.3%). 85.7% of the participants reported requesting a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan to VRF suspected cases, and the combination of four complementary exams was most frequently selected by dentists (23.59%). Professional qualification influenced the number of clinical signals and of auxiliary exams reported in VRF suspected cases (p<0.05). 91.9% of the participants reported using both the image and the CBCT report to evaluate the scan, and no association was observed between dentist qualifications and CBCT evaluation methods (p<0.05). 308 participants indicated extraction for teeth suspected of VRF, whereas 90 suggested surgical exposure, with 79 of them being Endodontists. A significant association was observed between dentist qualifications and clinical management in suspected VRF cases (p<0.05).
Conclusions: A variety of clinical and radiographic signals and symptoms were reported in suspected VRF cases. CBCT was the most commonly requested auxiliary exam. Professional qualification influenced the number of reported signals and symptoms, the number of auxiliary exams, and the clinical management strategies in suspected VRF cases. Key words:Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Endodontics, Questionnaire-based Study, Radicular Fracture, Vertical Root Fracture.
期刊介绍:
Indexed in PUBMED, PubMed Central® (PMC) since 2012 and SCOPUSJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is an Open Access (free access on-line) - http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm. The aim of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is: - Periodontology - Community and Preventive Dentistry - Esthetic Dentistry - Biomaterials and Bioengineering in Dentistry - Operative Dentistry and Endodontics - Prosthetic Dentistry - Orthodontics - Oral Medicine and Pathology - Odontostomatology for the disabled or special patients - Oral Surgery