玻璃离聚体骨水泥与复合树脂在非龋齿宫颈病变修复中的临床性能比较:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

Q2 Dentistry
Heber Isac Arbildo-Vega, Fredy Hugo Cruzado-Oliva, Franz Tito Coronel-Zubiate, Sara Antonieta Luján-Valencia, Joan Manuel Meza-Málaga, Rubén Aguirre-Ipenza, Adriana Echevarria-Goche, Eduardo Luján-Urviola, Tania Belú Castillo-Cornock, Katherine Serquen-Olano
{"title":"玻璃离聚体骨水泥与复合树脂在非龋齿宫颈病变修复中的临床性能比较:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Heber Isac Arbildo-Vega, Fredy Hugo Cruzado-Oliva, Franz Tito Coronel-Zubiate, Sara Antonieta Luján-Valencia, Joan Manuel Meza-Málaga, Rubén Aguirre-Ipenza, Adriana Echevarria-Goche, Eduardo Luján-Urviola, Tania Belú Castillo-Cornock, Katherine Serquen-Olano","doi":"10.4317/jced.62997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare the clinical performance of glass ionomer cement (GIC) vs. composite resin (CR) in restorations of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A bibliographic search was conducted until October 2023, in the biomedical databases: PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, SciELO, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Randomized clinical trials reporting the effect of GIC compared to CR in the restoration of NCCLs were included, without restrictions on publication date or language. The RoB 2.0 tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies and the GRADEPro GDT tool was used to assess the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded a total of 296 articles. After excluding those that did not meet the selection criteria, 18 articles remained for the quantitative synthesis. The analysis found no statistically significant differences between CR and GIC in the restoration of NCCLs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The literature reviewed suggests that there are no differences in clinical performance over time when restoring NCCLs with CRs or GICs. <b>Key words:</b>Non-carious cervical lesion, composite resin, glass ionomer cement, review, meta-analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","volume":"17 8","pages":"e995-e1005"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12424605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of clinical performance of glass ionomer cement vs. composite resin in restorations of non-carious cervical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Heber Isac Arbildo-Vega, Fredy Hugo Cruzado-Oliva, Franz Tito Coronel-Zubiate, Sara Antonieta Luján-Valencia, Joan Manuel Meza-Málaga, Rubén Aguirre-Ipenza, Adriana Echevarria-Goche, Eduardo Luján-Urviola, Tania Belú Castillo-Cornock, Katherine Serquen-Olano\",\"doi\":\"10.4317/jced.62997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare the clinical performance of glass ionomer cement (GIC) vs. composite resin (CR) in restorations of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A bibliographic search was conducted until October 2023, in the biomedical databases: PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, SciELO, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Randomized clinical trials reporting the effect of GIC compared to CR in the restoration of NCCLs were included, without restrictions on publication date or language. The RoB 2.0 tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies and the GRADEPro GDT tool was used to assess the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded a total of 296 articles. After excluding those that did not meet the selection criteria, 18 articles remained for the quantitative synthesis. The analysis found no statistically significant differences between CR and GIC in the restoration of NCCLs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The literature reviewed suggests that there are no differences in clinical performance over time when restoring NCCLs with CRs or GICs. <b>Key words:</b>Non-carious cervical lesion, composite resin, glass ionomer cement, review, meta-analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"17 8\",\"pages\":\"e995-e1005\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12424605/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62997\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:比较玻璃离子水泥(GIC)与复合树脂(CR)在宫颈非龋齿病变(NCCL)修复中的临床表现。材料和方法:到2023年10月,在生物医学数据库PubMed/Medline、Cochrane Library、SciELO、Scopus、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar中进行了书目检索。纳入了报告GIC与CR在ncls修复中的作用的随机临床试验,不受发表日期和语言的限制。使用RoB 2.0工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险,使用GRADEPro GDT工具评估证据质量和建议的强度。结果:检索到296篇文献。在剔除不符合选择标准的文献后,剩下18篇文献进行定量综合。分析发现CR和GIC在ncls修复方面无统计学差异。结论:文献综述表明,使用CRs或GICs修复ncls的临床表现没有随时间的差异。关键词:宫颈非龋齿病变,复合树脂,玻璃离子水泥,综述,meta分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of clinical performance of glass ionomer cement vs. composite resin in restorations of non-carious cervical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Comparison of clinical performance of glass ionomer cement vs. composite resin in restorations of non-carious cervical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Comparison of clinical performance of glass ionomer cement vs. composite resin in restorations of non-carious cervical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: To compare the clinical performance of glass ionomer cement (GIC) vs. composite resin (CR) in restorations of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL).

Material and methods: A bibliographic search was conducted until October 2023, in the biomedical databases: PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, SciELO, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Randomized clinical trials reporting the effect of GIC compared to CR in the restoration of NCCLs were included, without restrictions on publication date or language. The RoB 2.0 tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies and the GRADEPro GDT tool was used to assess the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations.

Results: The search yielded a total of 296 articles. After excluding those that did not meet the selection criteria, 18 articles remained for the quantitative synthesis. The analysis found no statistically significant differences between CR and GIC in the restoration of NCCLs.

Conclusions: The literature reviewed suggests that there are no differences in clinical performance over time when restoring NCCLs with CRs or GICs. Key words:Non-carious cervical lesion, composite resin, glass ionomer cement, review, meta-analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Indexed in PUBMED, PubMed Central® (PMC) since 2012 and SCOPUSJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is an Open Access (free access on-line) - http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm. The aim of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is: - Periodontology - Community and Preventive Dentistry - Esthetic Dentistry - Biomaterials and Bioengineering in Dentistry - Operative Dentistry and Endodontics - Prosthetic Dentistry - Orthodontics - Oral Medicine and Pathology - Odontostomatology for the disabled or special patients - Oral Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信