一线免疫检查点抑制剂在PD-L1 < 1%转移性非小细胞肺癌患者中的疗效和安全性——对日常临床实践的意义

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Maciej Bryl, Katarzyna Stencel, Magdalena Knetki-Wróblewska, Maciej Krzakowski
{"title":"一线免疫检查点抑制剂在PD-L1 < 1%转移性非小细胞肺癌患者中的疗效和安全性——对日常临床实践的意义","authors":"Maciej Bryl, Katarzyna Stencel, Magdalena Knetki-Wróblewska, Maciej Krzakowski","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2557610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor cell expression <1% are difficult to treat, and an optimal treatment strategy for these patients is yet to be defined.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>There have been significant advances in immunotherapy for NSCLC in the past decade. This article aims to answer the question of the optimal first-line treatment for patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC and PD-L1 expression <1%, based on efficacy and safety data from phase 3 studies (published up to 31 December 2024).</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Current evidence from subgroup and exploratory analyses of phase 3 studies and indirect comparisons suggest that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (with or without chemotherapy) combined with a cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 inhibitor or antiangiogenic therapy may provide the highest progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits in patients with newly diagnosed advanced/metastatic NSCLC and PD-L1 tumor cell expression <1%. Of these regimens, dual immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with chemotherapy appeared to offer some advantages in terms of OS, PFS, objective response rates, and duration of response, relative to other treatment approaches. Well-designed, comparative studies are warranted to more definitively determine the best first-line treatment for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with PD-L1 <1% metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer - implications for daily clinical practice.\",\"authors\":\"Maciej Bryl, Katarzyna Stencel, Magdalena Knetki-Wróblewska, Maciej Krzakowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737140.2025.2557610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor cell expression <1% are difficult to treat, and an optimal treatment strategy for these patients is yet to be defined.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>There have been significant advances in immunotherapy for NSCLC in the past decade. This article aims to answer the question of the optimal first-line treatment for patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC and PD-L1 expression <1%, based on efficacy and safety data from phase 3 studies (published up to 31 December 2024).</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Current evidence from subgroup and exploratory analyses of phase 3 studies and indirect comparisons suggest that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (with or without chemotherapy) combined with a cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 inhibitor or antiangiogenic therapy may provide the highest progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits in patients with newly diagnosed advanced/metastatic NSCLC and PD-L1 tumor cell expression <1%. Of these regimens, dual immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with chemotherapy appeared to offer some advantages in terms of OS, PFS, objective response rates, and duration of response, relative to other treatment approaches. Well-designed, comparative studies are warranted to more definitively determine the best first-line treatment for these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2557610\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2557610","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:晚期/转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)和程序性死亡配体-1 (PD-L1)肿瘤细胞表达的患者涵盖的领域:在过去十年中,NSCLC的免疫治疗取得了重大进展。本文旨在回答晚期/转移性NSCLC和PD-L1表达患者的最佳一线治疗问题。专家意见:目前来自亚组和3期研究的探索性分析以及间接比较的证据表明,PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂(有或没有化疗)联合细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关蛋白4抑制剂或抗血管生成治疗可能为新诊断的晚期/转移性非小细胞肺癌和PD-L1肿瘤细胞表达的患者提供最高的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)益处
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with PD-L1 <1% metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer - implications for daily clinical practice.

Introduction: Patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor cell expression <1% are difficult to treat, and an optimal treatment strategy for these patients is yet to be defined.

Areas covered: There have been significant advances in immunotherapy for NSCLC in the past decade. This article aims to answer the question of the optimal first-line treatment for patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC and PD-L1 expression <1%, based on efficacy and safety data from phase 3 studies (published up to 31 December 2024).

Expert opinion: Current evidence from subgroup and exploratory analyses of phase 3 studies and indirect comparisons suggest that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (with or without chemotherapy) combined with a cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 inhibitor or antiangiogenic therapy may provide the highest progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits in patients with newly diagnosed advanced/metastatic NSCLC and PD-L1 tumor cell expression <1%. Of these regimens, dual immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with chemotherapy appeared to offer some advantages in terms of OS, PFS, objective response rates, and duration of response, relative to other treatment approaches. Well-designed, comparative studies are warranted to more definitively determine the best first-line treatment for these patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches. Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信