全球姑息治疗研究现状:文献计量学研究。

IF 1.3 Q4 ONCOLOGY
ecancermedicalscience Pub Date : 2025-07-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3332/ecancer.2025.1943
Mevhibe B Hocaoglu, Grant Lewison, Hamish Sharp, Tania Pastrana, Eve Namisango, James Cleary, Barbara Hasties, Eric Kabisa, Helena Musau, Kathryn Spangenberg, Paola Ruiz, Zipporah Ali, Mertixell Mallafre-Larrosa, Alfredo Polo, Julie Torode, Ajay Aggarwal, Richard Sullivan
{"title":"全球姑息治疗研究现状:文献计量学研究。","authors":"Mevhibe B Hocaoglu, Grant Lewison, Hamish Sharp, Tania Pastrana, Eve Namisango, James Cleary, Barbara Hasties, Eric Kabisa, Helena Musau, Kathryn Spangenberg, Paola Ruiz, Zipporah Ali, Mertixell Mallafre-Larrosa, Alfredo Polo, Julie Torode, Ajay Aggarwal, Richard Sullivan","doi":"10.3332/ecancer.2025.1943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care research (PCR) plays a critical role in improving the quality of life for patients with serious illness, yet its global distribution and focus areas remain uneven. Understanding the trends and impact of PCR over the past decade can inform future research priorities and policy development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a bibliometric analysis of publications indexed in the Web of Science related to PCR between 2013 and 2022. Articles were identified using a comprehensive filter based on title keywords and specialist journals, and were further classified by research domain, disease area and study type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The volume of PCR publications has grown over the past decade, increasing from 0.29% of all biomedical research outputs in 2013-14 to 0.62% in 2021-22. Countries with the highest levels of PCR output-primarily European and Anglophone nations-also ranked highly on the Economist Intelligence Unit's Quality of Death Index. Using eight different bibliometric indicators, we assessed the impact of countries' PCR outputs; while rankings varied by metric, European countries such as the Netherlands, Belgium, the United Kingdom and Ireland consistently performed strongly. Cancer emerged as the dominant disease focus, although many studies also addressed co-morbid conditions including COVID-19 in recent years. A significant proportion of PCR also examined the impact of illness on patients' families and caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight cancer as a major area of focus and need within PCR. However, research outputs remain disproportionately concentrated in high-income countries, revealing a persistent gap in low- and middle-income settings.</p><p><strong>Recommendations: </strong>To address the growing global burden of cancer and serious illness, palliative care should be integrated as a core component of national cancer control plans. This integration must be supported by a targeted research agenda that emphasises implementation and scaling of palliative care models, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Policymakers and research funders should prioritise holistic, patient-centred approaches and ensure that impact measurement reflects meaningful outcomes for patients and families.</p>","PeriodicalId":11460,"journal":{"name":"ecancermedicalscience","volume":"19 ","pages":"1943"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12426503/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The state of global palliative care research: a bibliometric study.\",\"authors\":\"Mevhibe B Hocaoglu, Grant Lewison, Hamish Sharp, Tania Pastrana, Eve Namisango, James Cleary, Barbara Hasties, Eric Kabisa, Helena Musau, Kathryn Spangenberg, Paola Ruiz, Zipporah Ali, Mertixell Mallafre-Larrosa, Alfredo Polo, Julie Torode, Ajay Aggarwal, Richard Sullivan\",\"doi\":\"10.3332/ecancer.2025.1943\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care research (PCR) plays a critical role in improving the quality of life for patients with serious illness, yet its global distribution and focus areas remain uneven. Understanding the trends and impact of PCR over the past decade can inform future research priorities and policy development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a bibliometric analysis of publications indexed in the Web of Science related to PCR between 2013 and 2022. Articles were identified using a comprehensive filter based on title keywords and specialist journals, and were further classified by research domain, disease area and study type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The volume of PCR publications has grown over the past decade, increasing from 0.29% of all biomedical research outputs in 2013-14 to 0.62% in 2021-22. Countries with the highest levels of PCR output-primarily European and Anglophone nations-also ranked highly on the Economist Intelligence Unit's Quality of Death Index. Using eight different bibliometric indicators, we assessed the impact of countries' PCR outputs; while rankings varied by metric, European countries such as the Netherlands, Belgium, the United Kingdom and Ireland consistently performed strongly. Cancer emerged as the dominant disease focus, although many studies also addressed co-morbid conditions including COVID-19 in recent years. A significant proportion of PCR also examined the impact of illness on patients' families and caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight cancer as a major area of focus and need within PCR. However, research outputs remain disproportionately concentrated in high-income countries, revealing a persistent gap in low- and middle-income settings.</p><p><strong>Recommendations: </strong>To address the growing global burden of cancer and serious illness, palliative care should be integrated as a core component of national cancer control plans. This integration must be supported by a targeted research agenda that emphasises implementation and scaling of palliative care models, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Policymakers and research funders should prioritise holistic, patient-centred approaches and ensure that impact measurement reflects meaningful outcomes for patients and families.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ecancermedicalscience\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"1943\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12426503/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ecancermedicalscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2025.1943\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ecancermedicalscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2025.1943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:姑息治疗研究(Palliative care research, PCR)在改善重症患者的生活质量方面发挥着至关重要的作用,但其全球分布和重点领域仍不均衡。了解过去十年PCR的趋势和影响可以为未来的研究重点和政策制定提供信息。方法:我们对2013年至2022年在Web of Science检索的与PCR相关的出版物进行了文献计量学分析。使用基于标题关键词和专业期刊的综合筛选来识别文章,并根据研究领域、疾病领域和研究类型进一步分类。结果:PCR出版物的数量在过去十年中不断增长,从2013-14年占所有生物医学研究产出的0.29%增加到2021-22年的0.62%。PCR产出最高的国家——主要是欧洲和英语国家——在经济学人智库的死亡质量指数中排名也很高。使用八种不同的文献计量指标,我们评估了各国PCR产出的影响;虽然排名因指标而异,但荷兰、比利时、英国和爱尔兰等欧洲国家一直表现强劲。癌症成为主要的疾病焦点,尽管近年来许多研究也涉及包括COVID-19在内的合并症。相当大比例的PCR还检查了疾病对患者家属和照顾者的影响。结论:这些发现突出了癌症是PCR的主要关注和需求领域。然而,研究成果仍然不成比例地集中在高收入国家,这表明在低收入和中等收入环境中存在持续的差距。建议:为了应对日益增长的全球癌症和严重疾病负担,应将姑息治疗作为国家癌症控制计划的核心组成部分加以整合。这种整合必须得到有针对性的研究议程的支持,该议程强调实施和扩大姑息治疗模式,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。政策制定者和研究资助者应该优先考虑以患者为中心的整体方法,并确保影响测量反映出对患者和家庭有意义的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The state of global palliative care research: a bibliometric study.

The state of global palliative care research: a bibliometric study.

The state of global palliative care research: a bibliometric study.

The state of global palliative care research: a bibliometric study.

Background: Palliative care research (PCR) plays a critical role in improving the quality of life for patients with serious illness, yet its global distribution and focus areas remain uneven. Understanding the trends and impact of PCR over the past decade can inform future research priorities and policy development.

Methods: We conducted a bibliometric analysis of publications indexed in the Web of Science related to PCR between 2013 and 2022. Articles were identified using a comprehensive filter based on title keywords and specialist journals, and were further classified by research domain, disease area and study type.

Results: The volume of PCR publications has grown over the past decade, increasing from 0.29% of all biomedical research outputs in 2013-14 to 0.62% in 2021-22. Countries with the highest levels of PCR output-primarily European and Anglophone nations-also ranked highly on the Economist Intelligence Unit's Quality of Death Index. Using eight different bibliometric indicators, we assessed the impact of countries' PCR outputs; while rankings varied by metric, European countries such as the Netherlands, Belgium, the United Kingdom and Ireland consistently performed strongly. Cancer emerged as the dominant disease focus, although many studies also addressed co-morbid conditions including COVID-19 in recent years. A significant proportion of PCR also examined the impact of illness on patients' families and caregivers.

Conclusion: The findings highlight cancer as a major area of focus and need within PCR. However, research outputs remain disproportionately concentrated in high-income countries, revealing a persistent gap in low- and middle-income settings.

Recommendations: To address the growing global burden of cancer and serious illness, palliative care should be integrated as a core component of national cancer control plans. This integration must be supported by a targeted research agenda that emphasises implementation and scaling of palliative care models, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Policymakers and research funders should prioritise holistic, patient-centred approaches and ensure that impact measurement reflects meaningful outcomes for patients and families.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
138
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信