在丹麦南部地区的一个社区药房接受免费药物的门诊病人中未使用的药物。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Thomas Croft Buck, Mia Lolk Lund
{"title":"在丹麦南部地区的一个社区药房接受免费药物的门诊病人中未使用的药物。","authors":"Thomas Croft Buck, Mia Lolk Lund","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the extent and nature of unused medication dispensed from the hospital as cost-free medication (CFM), sent to and collected from the community pharmacy (St Thomas Pharmacy) in the Region of Southern Denmark.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study was conducted over 6 months. In the first 2 months, patients collecting CFM were invited to participate in an unused medication monitoring programme by completing an inclusion questionnaire. Those who consented were followed for four additional months and asked to report on unused medication during subsequent visits. Data on dispensed medication and patient-reported unused medication were collected using structured survey forms and analysed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen per cent of patients reported unused medication from approximately 100 enrolled participants. Collecting CFM for themselves, the unused medication rate was 15%, compared with 8% among those collecting on behalf of others. No unused medication was reported by first-time collectors. Reported reasons included clinical changes (eg, dose adjustments, treatment discontinuation, adverse effects) and administrative errors (eg, excess quantities, incorrect formulations). The total value of unused medication was estimated at 83 000 Kr (€11 100). Extrapolated to the annual distribution volume at the St Thomas Pharmacy, the annual loss from unused medication would be 900 000 Kr (€120 000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The small sample size in this project is a limitation and associated with an uncertain outcome. Unused medication related to CFM is a measurable and economically significant issue, primarily driven by clinical and administrative factors. While reducing pack sizes could help mitigate unused medication, this may increase logistical burdens on patients and healthcare providers. A larger distribution model, such as dispensing through all local community pharmacies under hospital tender agreements, may offer a more efficient solution but would require legislative reform. Broader, multi-site studies are needed to validate findings and inform future policy interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unused medication among outpatients receiving cost-free medication from a community pharmacy in the Region of Southern Denmark.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Croft Buck, Mia Lolk Lund\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the extent and nature of unused medication dispensed from the hospital as cost-free medication (CFM), sent to and collected from the community pharmacy (St Thomas Pharmacy) in the Region of Southern Denmark.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study was conducted over 6 months. In the first 2 months, patients collecting CFM were invited to participate in an unused medication monitoring programme by completing an inclusion questionnaire. Those who consented were followed for four additional months and asked to report on unused medication during subsequent visits. Data on dispensed medication and patient-reported unused medication were collected using structured survey forms and analysed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen per cent of patients reported unused medication from approximately 100 enrolled participants. Collecting CFM for themselves, the unused medication rate was 15%, compared with 8% among those collecting on behalf of others. No unused medication was reported by first-time collectors. Reported reasons included clinical changes (eg, dose adjustments, treatment discontinuation, adverse effects) and administrative errors (eg, excess quantities, incorrect formulations). The total value of unused medication was estimated at 83 000 Kr (€11 100). Extrapolated to the annual distribution volume at the St Thomas Pharmacy, the annual loss from unused medication would be 900 000 Kr (€120 000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The small sample size in this project is a limitation and associated with an uncertain outcome. Unused medication related to CFM is a measurable and economically significant issue, primarily driven by clinical and administrative factors. While reducing pack sizes could help mitigate unused medication, this may increase logistical burdens on patients and healthcare providers. A larger distribution model, such as dispensing through all local community pharmacies under hospital tender agreements, may offer a more efficient solution but would require legislative reform. Broader, multi-site studies are needed to validate findings and inform future policy interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004615\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-004615","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价丹麦南部地区社区药房(圣托马斯药房)发放和收取的医院未使用药物作为免费药物(CFM)的程度和性质。方法:本观察性研究为期6个月。在前2个月,收集CFM的患者被邀请通过填写纳入问卷参与未使用药物监测计划。那些同意的人被额外跟踪了四个月,并被要求在随后的访问中报告未使用的药物。使用结构化调查表格收集分配药物和患者报告的未使用药物的数据,并使用描述性统计进行分析。结果:大约100名参与者中,13%的患者报告未使用的药物。为自己收集CFM的未使用药物率为15%,而代他人收集CFM的未使用药物率为8%。首次收集者未报告未使用药物。报告的原因包括临床变化(例如,剂量调整、停止治疗、不良反应)和管理错误(例如,过量、不正确的配方)。未使用药物的总价值估计为83 000克朗(11 100欧元)。根据圣托马斯药房的年分发量推算,未使用药物每年造成的损失将达到90万克朗(12万欧元)。结论:本项目样本量小是一个局限性,与不确定的结果有关。与CFM相关的未使用药物是一个可测量的和经济上重要的问题,主要由临床和管理因素驱动。虽然减少包装大小可以帮助减少未使用的药物,但这可能会增加患者和医疗保健提供者的后勤负担。更大的分销模式,例如根据医院招标协议通过所有当地社区药房配药,可能是更有效的解决办法,但需要进行立法改革。需要更广泛的、多地点的研究来验证研究结果并为未来的政策干预提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unused medication among outpatients receiving cost-free medication from a community pharmacy in the Region of Southern Denmark.

Objective: To evaluate the extent and nature of unused medication dispensed from the hospital as cost-free medication (CFM), sent to and collected from the community pharmacy (St Thomas Pharmacy) in the Region of Southern Denmark.

Methods: This observational study was conducted over 6 months. In the first 2 months, patients collecting CFM were invited to participate in an unused medication monitoring programme by completing an inclusion questionnaire. Those who consented were followed for four additional months and asked to report on unused medication during subsequent visits. Data on dispensed medication and patient-reported unused medication were collected using structured survey forms and analysed using descriptive statistics.

Results: Thirteen per cent of patients reported unused medication from approximately 100 enrolled participants. Collecting CFM for themselves, the unused medication rate was 15%, compared with 8% among those collecting on behalf of others. No unused medication was reported by first-time collectors. Reported reasons included clinical changes (eg, dose adjustments, treatment discontinuation, adverse effects) and administrative errors (eg, excess quantities, incorrect formulations). The total value of unused medication was estimated at 83 000 Kr (€11 100). Extrapolated to the annual distribution volume at the St Thomas Pharmacy, the annual loss from unused medication would be 900 000 Kr (€120 000).

Conclusion: The small sample size in this project is a limitation and associated with an uncertain outcome. Unused medication related to CFM is a measurable and economically significant issue, primarily driven by clinical and administrative factors. While reducing pack sizes could help mitigate unused medication, this may increase logistical burdens on patients and healthcare providers. A larger distribution model, such as dispensing through all local community pharmacies under hospital tender agreements, may offer a more efficient solution but would require legislative reform. Broader, multi-site studies are needed to validate findings and inform future policy interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) offers a high quality, peer-reviewed platform for the publication of practical and innovative research which aims to strengthen the profile and professional status of hospital pharmacists. EJHP is committed to being the leading journal on all aspects of hospital pharmacy, thereby advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. The journal aims to become a major source for education and inspiration to improve practice and the standard of patient care in hospitals and related institutions worldwide. EJHP is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信