评估韩国电子药品包装传单的可读性和可用性:一项混合方法研究。

IF 3.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety Pub Date : 2025-09-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DHPS.S529397
Jinwook Yang, Kyenghee Kwon
{"title":"评估韩国电子药品包装传单的可读性和可用性:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Jinwook Yang, Kyenghee Kwon","doi":"10.2147/DHPS.S529397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>E-labeling, which refers to delivering medicine package leaflets electronically, has been introduced in several countries as an alternative to printed leaflets. However, little is known about whether e-labeling improves the readability and usability of medicine information from the patient's perspective. This study aimed to evaluate the readability and usability of e-labeling compared to traditional paper leaflets in South Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods user testing involving 77 adult participants recruited via convenience sampling. Participants were assigned to evaluate either a paper leaflet or e-labeling for a prescription antihypertensive or a non-prescription NSAID. Participants evaluated the printed leaflets or the corresponding PDF files by accessing them with their own mobile phones. Quantitative measures included traceability (accuracy in finding information), tracking speed (time taken to find information), and comprehension (whether the content was well understood). Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore user experiences, perceived barriers, and preferences for e-labeling adoption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across both drug types, e-labeling showed lower performance compared to paper leaflets. For the antihypertensive, traceability declined by 4.7%, tracking speed by 0.08 points, and comprehension by 3.3%. For the NSAID, these declines were 7.0%, 0.19 points, and 5.7%, respectively. Qualitative findings revealed mixed perceptions to e-labeling, with some valuing search functions and adjustable text size, while others highlighted difficulties navigating content and reduced accessibility. Participants emphasized the need for improved formatting, intuitive structure, and better utilization of digital features.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current e-labeling format may not sufficiently meet patients' needs for medicine information. To support successful implementation, e-labeling should be redesigned with a focus on patient-centered principles, ensuring equitable access, and being tested in real-world settings. Education and awareness campaigns on how to use e-labeling would provide practical guidance and encourage acceptance among patients. These findings provide patient-centered evidence to inform improvements in e-labeling policies and design.</p>","PeriodicalId":11377,"journal":{"name":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","volume":"17 ","pages":"181-196"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12433200/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Readability and Usability of Electronic Medicine Package Leaflets in South Korea: A Mixed-Methods Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jinwook Yang, Kyenghee Kwon\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/DHPS.S529397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>E-labeling, which refers to delivering medicine package leaflets electronically, has been introduced in several countries as an alternative to printed leaflets. However, little is known about whether e-labeling improves the readability and usability of medicine information from the patient's perspective. This study aimed to evaluate the readability and usability of e-labeling compared to traditional paper leaflets in South Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods user testing involving 77 adult participants recruited via convenience sampling. Participants were assigned to evaluate either a paper leaflet or e-labeling for a prescription antihypertensive or a non-prescription NSAID. Participants evaluated the printed leaflets or the corresponding PDF files by accessing them with their own mobile phones. Quantitative measures included traceability (accuracy in finding information), tracking speed (time taken to find information), and comprehension (whether the content was well understood). Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore user experiences, perceived barriers, and preferences for e-labeling adoption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across both drug types, e-labeling showed lower performance compared to paper leaflets. For the antihypertensive, traceability declined by 4.7%, tracking speed by 0.08 points, and comprehension by 3.3%. For the NSAID, these declines were 7.0%, 0.19 points, and 5.7%, respectively. Qualitative findings revealed mixed perceptions to e-labeling, with some valuing search functions and adjustable text size, while others highlighted difficulties navigating content and reduced accessibility. Participants emphasized the need for improved formatting, intuitive structure, and better utilization of digital features.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current e-labeling format may not sufficiently meet patients' needs for medicine information. To support successful implementation, e-labeling should be redesigned with a focus on patient-centered principles, ensuring equitable access, and being tested in real-world settings. Education and awareness campaigns on how to use e-labeling would provide practical guidance and encourage acceptance among patients. These findings provide patient-centered evidence to inform improvements in e-labeling policies and design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"181-196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12433200/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S529397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S529397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:电子标签是指以电子方式递送药品包装传单,已在几个国家引入,作为印刷传单的替代方案。然而,从患者的角度来看,电子标签是否提高了医学信息的可读性和可用性,我们知之甚少。本研究旨在评估与韩国传统纸质传单相比,电子标签的可读性和可用性。方法:采用方便抽样的方法,对77名成年参与者进行了混合方法的用户测试。参与者被分配评估处方抗高血压药或非处方非甾体抗炎药的纸质传单或电子标签。参与者用自己的移动电话访问打印的传单或相应的PDF文件,对其进行评估。定量度量包括可追溯性(查找信息的准确性)、跟踪速度(查找信息所花费的时间)和理解性(内容是否被很好地理解)。进行半结构化访谈以探索用户体验、感知障碍和电子标签采用偏好。结果:在两种药物类型中,电子标签与纸质传单相比表现出较低的性能。对于降压药,可追溯性下降了4.7%,跟踪速度下降了0.08点,理解度下降了3.3%。对于非甾体抗炎药,这些下降分别为7.0%,0.19点和5.7%。定性调查结果揭示了对电子标签的不同看法,一些人重视搜索功能和可调节的文本大小,而另一些人则强调导航内容的困难和降低了可访问性。与会者强调需要改进格式、直观结构和更好地利用数字特性。结论:目前的电子标签格式可能不能充分满足患者对药品信息的需求。为了支持成功实施,应重新设计电子标签,重点关注以患者为中心的原则,确保公平获取,并在现实环境中进行测试。关于如何使用电子标签的教育和宣传活动将提供实际指导,并鼓励患者接受。这些发现为改进电子标签政策和设计提供了以患者为中心的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing Readability and Usability of Electronic Medicine Package Leaflets in South Korea: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Assessing Readability and Usability of Electronic Medicine Package Leaflets in South Korea: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Assessing Readability and Usability of Electronic Medicine Package Leaflets in South Korea: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Purpose: E-labeling, which refers to delivering medicine package leaflets electronically, has been introduced in several countries as an alternative to printed leaflets. However, little is known about whether e-labeling improves the readability and usability of medicine information from the patient's perspective. This study aimed to evaluate the readability and usability of e-labeling compared to traditional paper leaflets in South Korea.

Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods user testing involving 77 adult participants recruited via convenience sampling. Participants were assigned to evaluate either a paper leaflet or e-labeling for a prescription antihypertensive or a non-prescription NSAID. Participants evaluated the printed leaflets or the corresponding PDF files by accessing them with their own mobile phones. Quantitative measures included traceability (accuracy in finding information), tracking speed (time taken to find information), and comprehension (whether the content was well understood). Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore user experiences, perceived barriers, and preferences for e-labeling adoption.

Results: Across both drug types, e-labeling showed lower performance compared to paper leaflets. For the antihypertensive, traceability declined by 4.7%, tracking speed by 0.08 points, and comprehension by 3.3%. For the NSAID, these declines were 7.0%, 0.19 points, and 5.7%, respectively. Qualitative findings revealed mixed perceptions to e-labeling, with some valuing search functions and adjustable text size, while others highlighted difficulties navigating content and reduced accessibility. Participants emphasized the need for improved formatting, intuitive structure, and better utilization of digital features.

Conclusion: The current e-labeling format may not sufficiently meet patients' needs for medicine information. To support successful implementation, e-labeling should be redesigned with a focus on patient-centered principles, ensuring equitable access, and being tested in real-world settings. Education and awareness campaigns on how to use e-labeling would provide practical guidance and encourage acceptance among patients. These findings provide patient-centered evidence to inform improvements in e-labeling policies and design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信