亲代控制:生态驱动亲代对后代信号反应的可塑性。

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Behavioral Ecology Pub Date : 2025-05-25 eCollection Date: 2025-05-22 DOI:10.1093/beheco/araf058
{"title":"亲代控制:生态驱动亲代对后代信号反应的可塑性。","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/beheco/araf058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Birds differ in their parent-offspring interactions, and these differences may be caused by environmental variation. When food is plentiful, the chicks that are begging the most are fed the most. When food is scarce, parents instead feed the largest offspring. This change could due to offspring adjusting their behaviour, or to confounding factors not directly related to current food availability, such as brood size. Alternatively, it could equally be due to parents responding to signals differently based on their experience of food availability in the recent past, for example, over the past weeks. We tested between these competing explanations experimentally, by manipulating food availability in a population of wild great tits, <i>Parus major</i>. We then standardised food availability, and manipulated offspring size and behaviour by creating mixed cross-fostered broods just before filming. This isolated the effect of parental strategies while holding food availability, offspring begging and size constant across treatments, but with sufficient variation within broods to generate usable information for parents. We found that when parents had experienced plentiful, supplemented food prior to filming, they were: (1) more likely to preferentially feed the chicks that were begging the most; and (2) less likely to preferentially feed larger chicks. Chicks, on the other hand, did not differ in their behavior in relation to the environmental conditions they had experienced previously, but instead begged in relation to their immediate feeding history and their nestmates' begging intensity. Overall, our results suggest that parents have more control over food distribution than suggested by scramble competition models, and that they can flexibly adjust how they respond to both offspring signals and cues of offspring quality in response to food availability. Consequently, different signalling systems are favoured depending on environmental conditions and predictability and parental plasticity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8840,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology","volume":"36 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7618113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parental control: ecology drives plasticity in parental response to offspring signals.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/beheco/araf058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Birds differ in their parent-offspring interactions, and these differences may be caused by environmental variation. When food is plentiful, the chicks that are begging the most are fed the most. When food is scarce, parents instead feed the largest offspring. This change could due to offspring adjusting their behaviour, or to confounding factors not directly related to current food availability, such as brood size. Alternatively, it could equally be due to parents responding to signals differently based on their experience of food availability in the recent past, for example, over the past weeks. We tested between these competing explanations experimentally, by manipulating food availability in a population of wild great tits, <i>Parus major</i>. We then standardised food availability, and manipulated offspring size and behaviour by creating mixed cross-fostered broods just before filming. This isolated the effect of parental strategies while holding food availability, offspring begging and size constant across treatments, but with sufficient variation within broods to generate usable information for parents. We found that when parents had experienced plentiful, supplemented food prior to filming, they were: (1) more likely to preferentially feed the chicks that were begging the most; and (2) less likely to preferentially feed larger chicks. Chicks, on the other hand, did not differ in their behavior in relation to the environmental conditions they had experienced previously, but instead begged in relation to their immediate feeding history and their nestmates' begging intensity. Overall, our results suggest that parents have more control over food distribution than suggested by scramble competition models, and that they can flexibly adjust how they respond to both offspring signals and cues of offspring quality in response to food availability. Consequently, different signalling systems are favoured depending on environmental conditions and predictability and parental plasticity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Ecology\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7618113/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/araf058\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/araf058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鸟类在亲子互动方面存在差异,这些差异可能是由环境变化引起的。当食物充足时,乞食次数最多的雏鸟得到的食物最多。当食物匮乏时,父母会喂养最大的后代。这种变化可能是由于后代调整了自己的行为,或者是与当前食物供应没有直接关系的混杂因素,比如后代的数量。或者,这同样可能是由于父母根据他们最近的食物供应经验对信号做出不同的反应,例如,过去几周。我们通过操纵野生大山雀(Parus major)种群的食物供应,对这些相互矛盾的解释进行了实验测试。然后,我们标准化了食物的供应,并在拍摄前通过制造混合的交叉培育的后代来操纵后代的大小和行为。这分离了亲代策略的影响,同时保持了食物的可用性,后代的乞讨和大小不变,但在育群中有足够的变化来为父母产生可用的信息。我们发现,当父母在拍摄前经历了丰富的补充食物时,他们:(1)更有可能优先喂养乞讨最多的雏鸟;(2)不太可能优先喂养较大的小鸡。另一方面,雏鸟的行为与它们之前所经历的环境条件没有关系,而是与它们的直接喂食历史和它们的同伴的乞讨强度有关。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,父母对食物分配的控制比争夺竞争模型所暗示的要大,并且他们可以灵活地调整他们对后代信号和后代质量线索的反应,以应对食物的可获得性。因此,根据环境条件、可预测性和亲代可塑性,不同的信号系统受到青睐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parental control: ecology drives plasticity in parental response to offspring signals.

Birds differ in their parent-offspring interactions, and these differences may be caused by environmental variation. When food is plentiful, the chicks that are begging the most are fed the most. When food is scarce, parents instead feed the largest offspring. This change could due to offspring adjusting their behaviour, or to confounding factors not directly related to current food availability, such as brood size. Alternatively, it could equally be due to parents responding to signals differently based on their experience of food availability in the recent past, for example, over the past weeks. We tested between these competing explanations experimentally, by manipulating food availability in a population of wild great tits, Parus major. We then standardised food availability, and manipulated offspring size and behaviour by creating mixed cross-fostered broods just before filming. This isolated the effect of parental strategies while holding food availability, offspring begging and size constant across treatments, but with sufficient variation within broods to generate usable information for parents. We found that when parents had experienced plentiful, supplemented food prior to filming, they were: (1) more likely to preferentially feed the chicks that were begging the most; and (2) less likely to preferentially feed larger chicks. Chicks, on the other hand, did not differ in their behavior in relation to the environmental conditions they had experienced previously, but instead begged in relation to their immediate feeding history and their nestmates' begging intensity. Overall, our results suggest that parents have more control over food distribution than suggested by scramble competition models, and that they can flexibly adjust how they respond to both offspring signals and cues of offspring quality in response to food availability. Consequently, different signalling systems are favoured depending on environmental conditions and predictability and parental plasticity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Ecology
Behavioral Ecology 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Studies on the whole range of behaving organisms, including plants, invertebrates, vertebrates, and humans, are included. Behavioral Ecology construes the field in its broadest sense to include 1) the use of ecological and evolutionary processes to explain the occurrence and adaptive significance of behavior patterns; 2) the use of behavioral processes to predict ecological patterns, and 3) empirical, comparative analyses relating behavior to the environment in which it occurs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信