β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂联合治疗耐多药细菌感染的作用:一项综合meta分析

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-08-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/JVJW7760
Fei Wu, Qiaoli Liu, Piao Hu, Changcai Wu
{"title":"β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂联合治疗耐多药细菌感染的作用:一项综合meta分析","authors":"Fei Wu, Qiaoli Liu, Piao Hu, Changcai Wu","doi":"10.62347/JVJW7760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections pose a global public health challenge. β-Lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLIs) are essential for treating MDR infections, although their efficacy varies across studies. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate their clinical value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on BLIs for MDR bacterial infections published from January 2000 to December 2024. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Primary outcomes included clinical efficacy rate, bacterial clearance rate, and incidence of adverse reactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen high-quality RCTs involving 2,356 patients were included. BLIs showed a significantly higher clinical efficacy rate (76.23%) than controls (62.45%) (RR=1.59, 95% CI: 1.44-1.73, P<0.001) and bacterial clearance rate (71.58% vs. 58.67%, RR=1.21, 95% CI: 1.16-1.26, P<0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed clinical efficacy rates of 73.45% for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and 78.32% for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, with bacterial clearance rates of 68.72% and 74.11%, respectively. The adverse reaction rate in the BLI group was 15.68% (mainly diarrhea, nausea, rash), which was not significantly different from the control group (17.89%, RR=0.96, 95% CI: 0.85-1.07, P=0.977).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BLIs demonstrate high efficacy, bacterial clearance, and safety in treating MDR infections, particularly CRE and ESBL infections. Larger multicenter RCTs are needed for further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 8","pages":"6488-6503"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12432685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in multidrug-resistant bacterial infections: a comprehensive meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Fei Wu, Qiaoli Liu, Piao Hu, Changcai Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/JVJW7760\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections pose a global public health challenge. β-Lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLIs) are essential for treating MDR infections, although their efficacy varies across studies. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate their clinical value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on BLIs for MDR bacterial infections published from January 2000 to December 2024. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Primary outcomes included clinical efficacy rate, bacterial clearance rate, and incidence of adverse reactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen high-quality RCTs involving 2,356 patients were included. BLIs showed a significantly higher clinical efficacy rate (76.23%) than controls (62.45%) (RR=1.59, 95% CI: 1.44-1.73, P<0.001) and bacterial clearance rate (71.58% vs. 58.67%, RR=1.21, 95% CI: 1.16-1.26, P<0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed clinical efficacy rates of 73.45% for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and 78.32% for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, with bacterial clearance rates of 68.72% and 74.11%, respectively. The adverse reaction rate in the BLI group was 15.68% (mainly diarrhea, nausea, rash), which was not significantly different from the control group (17.89%, RR=0.96, 95% CI: 0.85-1.07, P=0.977).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BLIs demonstrate high efficacy, bacterial clearance, and safety in treating MDR infections, particularly CRE and ESBL infections. Larger multicenter RCTs are needed for further validation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"volume\":\"17 8\",\"pages\":\"6488-6503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12432685/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/JVJW7760\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/JVJW7760","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:耐多药(MDR)细菌感染是一个全球性的公共卫生挑战。β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合(BLIs)对于治疗耐多药感染至关重要,尽管它们的疗效在不同的研究中有所不同。本荟萃分析旨在评估其临床价值。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆2000年1月至2024年12月发表的关于BLIs治疗耐多药细菌感染的随机对照试验(rct)。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估研究质量,使用RevMan 5.4进行meta分析。主要结局包括临床有效率、细菌清除率和不良反应发生率。结果:纳入18项高质量随机对照试验,涉及2356例患者。BLIs的临床有效率(76.23%)明显高于对照组(62.45%)(RR=1.59, 95% CI: 1.44 ~ 1.73)。结论:BLIs对耐多药感染,尤其是CRE和ESBL感染具有较高的疗效、清除率和安全性。需要更大规模的多中心随机对照试验来进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in multidrug-resistant bacterial infections: a comprehensive meta-analysis.

Background: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections pose a global public health challenge. β-Lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLIs) are essential for treating MDR infections, although their efficacy varies across studies. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate their clinical value.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on BLIs for MDR bacterial infections published from January 2000 to December 2024. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Primary outcomes included clinical efficacy rate, bacterial clearance rate, and incidence of adverse reactions.

Results: Eighteen high-quality RCTs involving 2,356 patients were included. BLIs showed a significantly higher clinical efficacy rate (76.23%) than controls (62.45%) (RR=1.59, 95% CI: 1.44-1.73, P<0.001) and bacterial clearance rate (71.58% vs. 58.67%, RR=1.21, 95% CI: 1.16-1.26, P<0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed clinical efficacy rates of 73.45% for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and 78.32% for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, with bacterial clearance rates of 68.72% and 74.11%, respectively. The adverse reaction rate in the BLI group was 15.68% (mainly diarrhea, nausea, rash), which was not significantly different from the control group (17.89%, RR=0.96, 95% CI: 0.85-1.07, P=0.977).

Conclusion: BLIs demonstrate high efficacy, bacterial clearance, and safety in treating MDR infections, particularly CRE and ESBL infections. Larger multicenter RCTs are needed for further validation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信