{"title":"健康人群肠溶阿司匹林胶囊和片剂的群体药代动力学和药效学模型。","authors":"JaeEun Koh, Juyoung Khwarg, Kyung-Sang Yu, SeungHwan Lee, In-Jin Jang, Soyoung Lee","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S533428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model to predict the PKs of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and salicylic acid (SA), and their effects on thromboxane B2 (TXB2) inhibition following oral administration of two enteric-coated aspirin formulations.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Data from two Phase I studies in healthy Korean subjects were used to develop the PK-PD model. A nonlinear mixed effect modeling approach was implemented using Monolix<sup>®</sup>, based on 669 plasma concentrations of ASA and SA and 83 serum TXB2 concentrations from 44 subjects. Simulx<sup>®</sup> was used for model-based simulation and external validation using published literature data. Differences in absorption profiles between two formulations were assessed as a covariate effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PK of aspirin was well described by a one-compartment model for ASA and a two-compartment model for SA, incorporating pre-systemic metabolism and dual absorption. A turnover model with an Emax function captured the TXB2 inhibition. The capsule formulation showed faster absorption (0.22 h<sup>-1</sup>) than the tablet (0.053 h<sup>-1</sup>), but this did not affect TXB2 inhibition. Body weight significantly influenced ASA-to-SA metabolism and SA clearance. External validation confirmed that the model adequately predicted PK and PD profiles at both 80 mg and 160 mg doses, with simulated TXB2 inhibition showing similar responses between formulations at steady state, exceeding 80%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This model adequately described the PK and PD of enteric-coated aspirin and demonstrated comparable TXB2 inhibition between the capsule and tablet formulations, supporting their potential interchangeability in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"19 ","pages":"7853-7863"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12433208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Enteric-Coated Aspirin Capsule and Tablet Formulations in Healthy Subjects.\",\"authors\":\"JaeEun Koh, Juyoung Khwarg, Kyung-Sang Yu, SeungHwan Lee, In-Jin Jang, Soyoung Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/DDDT.S533428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model to predict the PKs of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and salicylic acid (SA), and their effects on thromboxane B2 (TXB2) inhibition following oral administration of two enteric-coated aspirin formulations.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Data from two Phase I studies in healthy Korean subjects were used to develop the PK-PD model. A nonlinear mixed effect modeling approach was implemented using Monolix<sup>®</sup>, based on 669 plasma concentrations of ASA and SA and 83 serum TXB2 concentrations from 44 subjects. Simulx<sup>®</sup> was used for model-based simulation and external validation using published literature data. Differences in absorption profiles between two formulations were assessed as a covariate effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PK of aspirin was well described by a one-compartment model for ASA and a two-compartment model for SA, incorporating pre-systemic metabolism and dual absorption. A turnover model with an Emax function captured the TXB2 inhibition. The capsule formulation showed faster absorption (0.22 h<sup>-1</sup>) than the tablet (0.053 h<sup>-1</sup>), but this did not affect TXB2 inhibition. Body weight significantly influenced ASA-to-SA metabolism and SA clearance. External validation confirmed that the model adequately predicted PK and PD profiles at both 80 mg and 160 mg doses, with simulated TXB2 inhibition showing similar responses between formulations at steady state, exceeding 80%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This model adequately described the PK and PD of enteric-coated aspirin and demonstrated comparable TXB2 inhibition between the capsule and tablet formulations, supporting their potential interchangeability in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Design, Development and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"7853-7863\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12433208/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Design, Development and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S533428\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S533428","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Enteric-Coated Aspirin Capsule and Tablet Formulations in Healthy Subjects.
Purpose: This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model to predict the PKs of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and salicylic acid (SA), and their effects on thromboxane B2 (TXB2) inhibition following oral administration of two enteric-coated aspirin formulations.
Patients and methods: Data from two Phase I studies in healthy Korean subjects were used to develop the PK-PD model. A nonlinear mixed effect modeling approach was implemented using Monolix®, based on 669 plasma concentrations of ASA and SA and 83 serum TXB2 concentrations from 44 subjects. Simulx® was used for model-based simulation and external validation using published literature data. Differences in absorption profiles between two formulations were assessed as a covariate effect.
Results: The PK of aspirin was well described by a one-compartment model for ASA and a two-compartment model for SA, incorporating pre-systemic metabolism and dual absorption. A turnover model with an Emax function captured the TXB2 inhibition. The capsule formulation showed faster absorption (0.22 h-1) than the tablet (0.053 h-1), but this did not affect TXB2 inhibition. Body weight significantly influenced ASA-to-SA metabolism and SA clearance. External validation confirmed that the model adequately predicted PK and PD profiles at both 80 mg and 160 mg doses, with simulated TXB2 inhibition showing similar responses between formulations at steady state, exceeding 80%.
Conclusion: This model adequately described the PK and PD of enteric-coated aspirin and demonstrated comparable TXB2 inhibition between the capsule and tablet formulations, supporting their potential interchangeability in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications.
The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas.
Specific topics covered by the journal include:
Drug target identification and validation
Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution
Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways
New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery*
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes)
Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes
Fragment-based drug discovery
Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology
Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products**
Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development
Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing)
Preclinical development studies
Translational animal models
Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways
Toxicology
Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy
Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics
Clinical drug evaluation
Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.