鉴别BI-RADS 4类乳腺肿块良恶性的临床-超声放射组学联合模型。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-08-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/SBKU2090
Qing Zhang, Juan Gao, Enock Adjei Agyekum, Linna Zhu, Chao Jiang, Suping Du, Liang Yin
{"title":"鉴别BI-RADS 4类乳腺肿块良恶性的临床-超声放射组学联合模型。","authors":"Qing Zhang, Juan Gao, Enock Adjei Agyekum, Linna Zhu, Chao Jiang, Suping Du, Liang Yin","doi":"10.62347/SBKU2090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a model combining gray-scale ultrasound (US) radiomic features and clinical data in distinguishing benign from malignant breast masses classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 149 women with pathologically confirmed breast masses were included and randomly divided into a training cohort (n=104) and a validation cohort (n=45). A total of 1,046 radiomic features were extracted from US images. Feature selection was performed using Pearson correlation analysis followed by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Three K-nearest neighbor (KNN) classifiers were developed: a clinical model, an ultrasound radiomics (USR) model, and a combined clinical-USR model. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven radiomic features and two clinical variables were selected for model construction. In the training cohort, the combined clinical-USR model achieved an AUC of 0.927, with an accuracy of 89.0%, sensitivity of 88.9%, and specificity of 89.8%. In the validation cohort, the AUC of 0.826, with an accuracy of 80.0%, sensitivity of 83.3%, and specificity of 66.7%. The standalone USR model yielded AUCs of 0.902 and 0.883 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively, while the clinical model showed lower AUCs of 0.876 and 0.794. Decision curve analysis (DCA) indicated that the combined model provided a greater net clinical benefit than the clinical model alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The integration of ultrasound radiomic features with clinical data improves diagnostic performance in differentiating benign from malignant BI-RADS 4 breast masses. The combined model holds potential for aiding clinical decision-making but requires further validation in larger, independent datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 8","pages":"6370-6380"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12432749/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A combined clinical-ultrasound radiomics model for differentiating benign and malignant BI-RADS category 4 breast masses.\",\"authors\":\"Qing Zhang, Juan Gao, Enock Adjei Agyekum, Linna Zhu, Chao Jiang, Suping Du, Liang Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/SBKU2090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a model combining gray-scale ultrasound (US) radiomic features and clinical data in distinguishing benign from malignant breast masses classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 149 women with pathologically confirmed breast masses were included and randomly divided into a training cohort (n=104) and a validation cohort (n=45). A total of 1,046 radiomic features were extracted from US images. Feature selection was performed using Pearson correlation analysis followed by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Three K-nearest neighbor (KNN) classifiers were developed: a clinical model, an ultrasound radiomics (USR) model, and a combined clinical-USR model. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven radiomic features and two clinical variables were selected for model construction. In the training cohort, the combined clinical-USR model achieved an AUC of 0.927, with an accuracy of 89.0%, sensitivity of 88.9%, and specificity of 89.8%. In the validation cohort, the AUC of 0.826, with an accuracy of 80.0%, sensitivity of 83.3%, and specificity of 66.7%. The standalone USR model yielded AUCs of 0.902 and 0.883 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively, while the clinical model showed lower AUCs of 0.876 and 0.794. Decision curve analysis (DCA) indicated that the combined model provided a greater net clinical benefit than the clinical model alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The integration of ultrasound radiomic features with clinical data improves diagnostic performance in differentiating benign from malignant BI-RADS 4 breast masses. The combined model holds potential for aiding clinical decision-making but requires further validation in larger, independent datasets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"volume\":\"17 8\",\"pages\":\"6370-6380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12432749/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/SBKU2090\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/SBKU2090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价灰度超声(US)放射学特征与临床资料相结合的模型对乳腺影像报告与数据系统(BI-RADS)第4类乳腺肿块良恶性鉴别的诊断价值。方法:回顾性研究149例经病理证实的乳腺肿块患者,随机分为训练组(n=104)和验证组(n=45)。从美国图像中提取了1046个放射学特征。使用Pearson相关分析进行特征选择,然后使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归。开发了三种k最近邻(KNN)分类器:临床模型,超声放射组学(USR)模型和临床-USR联合模型。通过准确性、灵敏度、特异性和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)来评估模型的性能。结果:选取7个放射学特征和2个临床变量建立模型。在培训队列中,临床- usr联合模型的AUC为0.927,准确率为89.0%,灵敏度为88.9%,特异性为89.8%。在验证队列中,AUC为0.826,准确率为80.0%,灵敏度为83.3%,特异性为66.7%。单独USR模型在训练和验证队列中的auc分别为0.902和0.883,而临床模型的auc较低,分别为0.876和0.794。决策曲线分析(Decision curve analysis, DCA)显示,联合治疗模式比单独治疗模式提供更大的临床净收益。结论:超声影像学特征与临床资料的结合提高了BI-RADS 4乳腺肿块良恶性鉴别的诊断效能。联合模型具有帮助临床决策的潜力,但需要在更大的独立数据集中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A combined clinical-ultrasound radiomics model for differentiating benign and malignant BI-RADS category 4 breast masses.

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a model combining gray-scale ultrasound (US) radiomic features and clinical data in distinguishing benign from malignant breast masses classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 149 women with pathologically confirmed breast masses were included and randomly divided into a training cohort (n=104) and a validation cohort (n=45). A total of 1,046 radiomic features were extracted from US images. Feature selection was performed using Pearson correlation analysis followed by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Three K-nearest neighbor (KNN) classifiers were developed: a clinical model, an ultrasound radiomics (USR) model, and a combined clinical-USR model. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results: Seven radiomic features and two clinical variables were selected for model construction. In the training cohort, the combined clinical-USR model achieved an AUC of 0.927, with an accuracy of 89.0%, sensitivity of 88.9%, and specificity of 89.8%. In the validation cohort, the AUC of 0.826, with an accuracy of 80.0%, sensitivity of 83.3%, and specificity of 66.7%. The standalone USR model yielded AUCs of 0.902 and 0.883 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively, while the clinical model showed lower AUCs of 0.876 and 0.794. Decision curve analysis (DCA) indicated that the combined model provided a greater net clinical benefit than the clinical model alone.

Conclusion: The integration of ultrasound radiomic features with clinical data improves diagnostic performance in differentiating benign from malignant BI-RADS 4 breast masses. The combined model holds potential for aiding clinical decision-making but requires further validation in larger, independent datasets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信