可持续的天然产物糖基化:生物催化和化学方法的关键评价。

IF 6.6 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
ChemSusChem Pub Date : 2025-09-15 DOI:10.1002/cssc.202501094
Felipe Mejia-Otalvaro, Brianna Marie Lax, Onur Kırtel, Ditte Hededam Welner
{"title":"可持续的天然产物糖基化:生物催化和化学方法的关键评价。","authors":"Felipe Mejia-Otalvaro, Brianna Marie Lax, Onur Kırtel, Ditte Hededam Welner","doi":"10.1002/cssc.202501094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The glycosylation of natural products can significantly enhance their physicochemical properties, with numerous synthetic and biocatalytic methodologies continuously being developed, each presenting unique advantages and challenges. Biocatalytic methods are often presumed to be more sustainable alternatives to chemical approaches; however, their environmental and economic viabilities require critical evaluation. This review summarizes the recent advancements in natural product glycosylation and provides a comprehensive techno-economic and environmental assessment based on yield, titer, rate, environmental factor, and impact on endpoint categories using a life cycle impact assessment approach. Although biocatalytic methods are highlighted for their superior yields, they are frequently hindered by lower titers and reaction rates compared to their chemical counterparts. Surprisingly, chemical glycosylation exhibited lower environmental factors (E-factors), whereas biocatalytic approaches displayed lower impacts on endpoint categories, highlighting that E-factors fail to capture the environmental implications of a process. This review demonstrates the challenges associated with quantifying the environmental impacts of a process, especially given the lack of experimental detail reporting in the biocatalytic field. It exposes the misguided assumption that biocatalytic processes always exert lower environmental burdens and identifies key opportunities to enhance process efficiency and sustainability, providing guidance for selecting and developing a given natural product glycosylation reaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":149,"journal":{"name":"ChemSusChem","volume":" ","pages":"e2501094"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainable Natural Product Glycosylation: A Critical Evaluation of Biocatalytic and Chemical Approaches.\",\"authors\":\"Felipe Mejia-Otalvaro, Brianna Marie Lax, Onur Kırtel, Ditte Hededam Welner\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cssc.202501094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The glycosylation of natural products can significantly enhance their physicochemical properties, with numerous synthetic and biocatalytic methodologies continuously being developed, each presenting unique advantages and challenges. Biocatalytic methods are often presumed to be more sustainable alternatives to chemical approaches; however, their environmental and economic viabilities require critical evaluation. This review summarizes the recent advancements in natural product glycosylation and provides a comprehensive techno-economic and environmental assessment based on yield, titer, rate, environmental factor, and impact on endpoint categories using a life cycle impact assessment approach. Although biocatalytic methods are highlighted for their superior yields, they are frequently hindered by lower titers and reaction rates compared to their chemical counterparts. Surprisingly, chemical glycosylation exhibited lower environmental factors (E-factors), whereas biocatalytic approaches displayed lower impacts on endpoint categories, highlighting that E-factors fail to capture the environmental implications of a process. This review demonstrates the challenges associated with quantifying the environmental impacts of a process, especially given the lack of experimental detail reporting in the biocatalytic field. It exposes the misguided assumption that biocatalytic processes always exert lower environmental burdens and identifies key opportunities to enhance process efficiency and sustainability, providing guidance for selecting and developing a given natural product glycosylation reaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ChemSusChem\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e2501094\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ChemSusChem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202501094\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ChemSusChem","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202501094","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

天然产物的糖基化可以显著提高其物理化学性质,许多合成和生物催化方法不断被开发出来,每种方法都有其独特的优势和挑战。生物催化方法通常被认为是比化学方法更可持续的替代方法;但是,它们的环境和经济可行性需要进行严格的评价。本文综述了天然产物糖基化的最新进展,并基于产率、滴度、速率、环境因素和使用生命周期影响评估方法对终点类别的影响,提供了综合的技术经济和环境评价。虽然生物催化方法因其优越的产量而受到重视,但与化学方法相比,它们经常受到滴度和反应速率较低的阻碍。令人惊讶的是,化学糖基化表现出较低的环境因素(e -因子),而生物催化方法对终点类别的影响较低,突出表明e -因子无法捕捉过程的环境影响。这篇综述展示了与量化一个过程的环境影响相关的挑战,特别是在生物催化领域缺乏实验细节报告的情况下。它揭示了错误的假设,即生物催化过程总是施加较低的环境负担,并确定了提高过程效率和可持续性的关键机会,为选择和开发给定的天然产物糖基化反应提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustainable Natural Product Glycosylation: A Critical Evaluation of Biocatalytic and Chemical Approaches.

The glycosylation of natural products can significantly enhance their physicochemical properties, with numerous synthetic and biocatalytic methodologies continuously being developed, each presenting unique advantages and challenges. Biocatalytic methods are often presumed to be more sustainable alternatives to chemical approaches; however, their environmental and economic viabilities require critical evaluation. This review summarizes the recent advancements in natural product glycosylation and provides a comprehensive techno-economic and environmental assessment based on yield, titer, rate, environmental factor, and impact on endpoint categories using a life cycle impact assessment approach. Although biocatalytic methods are highlighted for their superior yields, they are frequently hindered by lower titers and reaction rates compared to their chemical counterparts. Surprisingly, chemical glycosylation exhibited lower environmental factors (E-factors), whereas biocatalytic approaches displayed lower impacts on endpoint categories, highlighting that E-factors fail to capture the environmental implications of a process. This review demonstrates the challenges associated with quantifying the environmental impacts of a process, especially given the lack of experimental detail reporting in the biocatalytic field. It exposes the misguided assumption that biocatalytic processes always exert lower environmental burdens and identifies key opportunities to enhance process efficiency and sustainability, providing guidance for selecting and developing a given natural product glycosylation reaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ChemSusChem
ChemSusChem 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: ChemSusChem Impact Factor (2016): 7.226 Scope: Interdisciplinary journal Focuses on research at the interface of chemistry and sustainability Features the best research on sustainability and energy Areas Covered: Chemistry Materials Science Chemical Engineering Biotechnology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信